Implicit proactive interference, age, and automatic versus controlled retrieval strategies: Research article

Psychological Science

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 456-461

  Ikier, Simay ^a   Yang, Lixia ^b   Hasher, Lynn ^c,d  

^a YEDITEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b RYERSON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^d ROTMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE; AGED; AGING; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LONG TERM MEMORY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PAIRED ASSOCIATE LEARNING; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROACTIVE INHIBITION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REACTION TIME; RECALL; RECOGNITION; STATISTICS; STUDENT; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGING; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PAIRED-ASSOCIATE LEARNING; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PROACTIVE INHIBITION; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); RETENTION (PSYCHOLOGY); STUDENTS; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 43149088287     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: 14679280     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02109.x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Balota, D.A., Dolan, P.O. Duchek, J.M. (2000). Memory changes in healthy older adults. In F.I.M. Craik (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 395 409). London : Oxford University Press.
2. Crowder, R.G. (1976). Principles of learning and memory. Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum.
3. Gazzaley, A., Cooney, J.W., Rissman, J. D'Esposito, M. (2005). Top-down suppression deficit underlies working memory impairment in normal aging. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1298 1300.
4. Hasher, L. Zacks, R.T. (1988). Working memory, comprehension, and aging: A review and a new view. In G.H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory, Vol. 22 (pp. 193 225). San Diego, CA : Academic Press.
5. Hasher, L., Zacks, R.T. May, C.P. (1999). Inhibitory control, circadian arousal, and age. In D. Gopher A. Koriat (Eds.), Attention and performance XVII (pp. 653 675). Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
6. Hassin, R.R. (2005). Non-conscious control and implicit working memory. In R.R. Hassin, J.S. Uleman J.A. Bargh (Eds.), The new unconscious (pp. 196 225). New York : Oxford University Press.
7. Hazeltine, E., Poldrack, R. Gabrieli, J.D.E. (2000). Neural activation during response competition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12 (Suppl. 2), 118 129.
8. Horton, K.D., Wilson, D.E. Evans, M. (2001). Measuring automatic retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 958 966.
9. Ikier, S. Hasher, L. (2006). Age differences in implicit interference. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 61B, P278 P284.
10. Jonides, J. Nee, D.E. (2006). Brain mechanisms of proactive interference in working memory. Neuroscience, 139, 181 193.
11. Katzman, R., Brown, T., Fuld, P., Peck, A., Schechter, R. Schimmel, H. (1983). Validation of a short Orientation-Memory-Concentration Test of cognitive impairment. American Journal of Psychiatry, 140, 734 739.
12. Kinoshita, S. Towgood, K. (2001). Effects of dividing attention on the memory-block effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 889 895.
13. Kintsch, W. (1977). Memory and cognition. New York : John Wiley & Sons.
14. Lustig, C. Hasher, L. (2001a). Implicit memory is not immune to interference. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 618 628.
15. Lustig, C. Hasher, L. (2001b). Implicit memory is vulnerable to proactive interference. Psychological Science, 12, 408 412.
16. Lustig, C., Hasher, L. Zacks, R.T. (2007). Inhibitory deficit theory: Recent developments in a "new view." In D.S. Gorfein C.M. MacLeod (Eds.), The place of inhibition in cognition (pp. 145 162). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
17. Lustig, C., Konkel, A. Jacoby, L.L. (2004). Which route to recovery? Controlled retrieval and accessibility bias in retroactive interference. Psychological Science, 15, 729 735.
18. Lustig, C., May, C.P. Hasher, L. (2001). Working memory span and the role of proactive interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 199 207.
19. Martens, S. Wolters, G. (2002). Interference in implicit memory caused by processing of interpolated material. American Journal of Psychology, 115, 169 185.
20. Mayes, A.R., Pickering, A. Fairbairn, A. (1987). Amnesic sensitivity to proactive interference: Its relationship to priming and the causes of amnesia. Neuropsychologia, 25, 211 220.
21. Nelson, D.L., Keelean, P.D. Negrao, M. (1989). Word-fragment cuing: The lexical search hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 388 397.
22. Postman, L. Underwood, B.J. (1973). Critical issues in interference theory. Memory & Cognition, 1, 19 40.
23. Richardson-Klavehn, A. Gardiner, J.M. (1995). Conjoint dissociations reveal involuntary "perceptual" priming from generating at study. Consciousness & Cognition, 8, 271 284.
24. Shimamura, A.P., Jurica, P.J., Mangels, J.A., Gershberg, F.B. Knight, R.T. (1995). Susceptibility to memory interference effects following frontal lobe damage: Findings from tests of paired-associate learning. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 144 152.
25. Shipley, W.C. (1940). A self-administering scale for measuring intellectual impairment and deterioration. Journal of Psychology, 9, 371 377.
26. Smith, S.M. Tindell, D.R. (1997). Memory blocks in word fragment completion caused by involuntary retrieval of orthographically related primes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 355 370.
27. Winocur, G., Moscovitch, M. Bruni, J. (1996). Heightened interference on implicit, but not explicit, tests of negative transfer: Evidence from patients with unilateral temporal lobe lesions and normal old people. Brain and Cognition, 30, 44 58.
28. Yang, L., Hasher, S. Wilson, D.E. (2007). Synchrony effects in automatic and controlled retrieval. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 51 56.