Which route to recovery? Controlled retrieval and accessibility bias in retroactive interference

Psychological Science

Volumn 15, Issue 11, 2004, Pages 729-735

  Lustig, Cindy ^a,b   Konkel, Alex ^a,c   Jacoby, Larry L ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^d WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; AUTOMATISM; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; HUMAN; MEMORY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

AUTOMATISM; CUES; HUMANS; MEMORY; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION;

EID: 9344257282     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00749.x     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Barnes, J.M., & Underwood, B.J. (1959). "Fate" of first-list associations in transfer theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 97-105.
2. Bjork, R.A. (2001). Recency and recovery in human memory. In H.L. Roediger, III, J.S. Nairne, I. Neath, & A.M. Surprenant (Eds.), The nature of remembering: Essays in honor of Robert G. Crowder (pp. 211-232). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
3. Bouton, M.E. (2000). A learning theory perspective on lapse, relapse, and the maintenance of behavior change. Health Psychology, 19, 57-63.
4. Bouton, M.E. (2002). Context, ambiguity, and unlearning: Sources of relapse after behavioral extinction. Biological Psychiatry, 52, 976-986.
5. Brown, A.S. (1976). Spontaneous recovery in human learning. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 321-328.
6. Crowder, R.G. (1976). Principles of learning and memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Educational Testing Service. (1976). Kit of factor-referenced tests. Princeton, NJ: Author.
8. Estes, W.K. (1955). Statistical theory of spontaneous recovery and regression. Psychological Review, 62, 145-154.
9. Hasher, L., Griffin, M., & Johnson, M.K. (1977). More on interpretive factors in forgetting. Memory & Cognition, 5, 41-45.
10. Hasher, L., & Johnson, M.K. (1975). Interpretive factors in forgetting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1, 567-575.
11. Hasher, L., & Zacks, R.T. (1979). Automatic and effortful processes in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 356-388.
12. Hay, J.F., & Jacoby, L.L. (1996). Separating habit and recollection: Memory slips, process dissociations, and probability matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1323-1335.
13. Hay, J.F., & Jacoby, L.L. (1999). Separating habit and recollection in young and older adults: Effects of elaborative processing and distinctiveness. Psychology and Aging, 14, 122-134.
14. Jacoby, L.L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513-541.
15. Jacoby, L.L. (1994). Measuring recollection: Strategic vs automatic influences of associative context. In C. Umilta & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV (pp. 661-679). Cambridge, MA: Bedford.
16. Jacoby, L.L. (1998). Invariance in automatic influences of memory: Toward a user's guide for the process-dissociation procedure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 3-26.
17. Jacoby, L.L., Hessels, S., & Bopp, K. (2001). Proactive and retroactive effects in memory performance. In H.L. Roediger, III, J.S. Nairne, I. Neath, & A.M. Surprenant (Eds.), The nature of remembering: Essays in honor of Robert G. Crowder (pp. 35-54). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
18. Jennings, J.M., & Jacoby, L.L. (1993). Automatic versus intentional uses of memory - aging, attention, and control. Psychology and Aging, 8, 283-293.
19. Jost, A. (1897). Die assoziationfestigkeit in ihrer abhangigheit von der Verteilung der Wiederholungen. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 14, 436-472.
20. Loftus, E.F. (1975). Leading questions and the eyewitness report. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 560-572.
21. Lustig, C., & Hasher, L. (2001a). Implicit memory is not immune to interference. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 618-628.
22. Lustig, C., & Hasher, L. (2001b). Implicit memory is vulnerable to proactive interference. Psychological Science, 12, 408-412.
23. McCloskey, M., & Zaragoza, M. (1985). Misleading postevent information and memory for events: Arguments and evidence against memory impairment hypotheses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 1-16.
24. McGeogh, J.A. (1942). The psychology of human learning. New York: Longmans, Green.
25. Melton, A.W., & Irwin, J.M. (1940). The influence of degree of interpolated learning on retroactive inhibition and the overt transfer of specific responses. American Journal of Psychology, 53, 173-203.
26. Miller, N.E., & Stevenson, S.S. (1936). Agitated behavior of rats during experimental extinction and a curve of spontaneous recovery. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 21, 205-231.
27. Nelson, D.L., Keelean, P.D., & Negrao, M. (1989). Word-fragment cueing: The lexical search hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 388-397.
28. Pavlov, I.P. (1927). Conditioned reflexes: An investigation of the physiological activity of the cerebral cortex. London: Oxford University Press.
29. Postman, L. (1971). Organization and interference. Psychological Review, 78, 290-302.
30. Postman, L., Stark, K., & Fraser, J. (1968). Temporal changes in interference. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 7, 672-694.
31. Postman, L., & Underwood, B.J. (1973). Critical issues in interference theory. Memory & Cognition, 1, 19-40.
32. Reitan, R.M. (1958). Validity of the Trail Making Test as an indicator of organic brain damage. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 8, 271-276.
33. Schacter, D.L. (1987). Implicit memory: History and current status. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 501-519.
34. Shimamura, A.P., Jurica, P.J., Mangels, J.A., Gershberg, F.B., & Knight, R.T. (1995). Susceptibility to memory interference effects following frontal-lobe damage: Findings from tests of paired-associate learning. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 144-152.
35. Shipley, W.C. (1940). A self-administering scale for measuring intellectual impairment and deterioration. Journal of Psychology, 9, 371-377.
36. Sloman, S.A., Hayman, C.A.G., Ohta, N., Law, J., & Tulving, E. (1988). Forgetting in primed fragment completion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 223-239.
37. Underwood, B.J. (1948). "Spontaneous recovery" of verbal associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 429-439.
38. Underwood, B.J. (1971). Recognition memory. In H. Kendler & J. Spence (Eds.), Essays in neobehaviorism: A memorial volume to Kenneth W. Spence (pp. 313-335). East Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
39. Wheeler, M.A. (1995). Improvement in recall over time without repeated testing: Spontaneous recovery revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 21, 173-184.
40. Winocur, G., Moscovitch, M., & Bruni, J. (1996). Heightened interference on implicit, but not explicit, tests of negative transfer: Evidence from patients with unilateral temporal lobe lesions and normal old people. Brain and Cognition, 30, 44-58.
41. Yonelinas, A.P., & Jacoby, L.L. (1994). Dissociations of processes in recognition memory: Effects of interference and of response speed. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 516-534.