Measuring bias: Moving from two-party to three-party elections

Electoral Studies

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 245-256

  Borisyuk, Galina ^a   Johnston, Ron ^b   Thrasher, Michael ^a   Rallings, Colin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Electoral bias; Electoral geography; Third parties

Indexed keywords

ELECTION; ELECTORAL GEOGRAPHY; PARTY POLITICS; VOTING BEHAVIOR;

EURASIA; EUROPE; UNITED KINGDOM; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 43049181472     PISSN: 02613794     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2007.11.011     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Blau A. Partisan bias in British general elections. In: Tonge J., Bennie L., Denver D., and Harrison L. (Eds). British Elections and Parties Review vol. 11 (2001), Frank Cass, London 46-65
2. Blau A. A quadruple whammy for first-past-the-post. Electoral Studies 23 (2004) 431-453
3. Brookes R.H. Seats and votes in New Zealand. Political Science 5 (1953) 37-44
4. Brookes R.H. Electoral distortion in New Zealand. Australian Journal of Politics and History 5 (1959) 218-223
5. Brookes R.H. The analysis of distorted representation in two-party, single-member elections. Political Science 12 (1960) 158-167
6. Calvo E., and Micozzi J.P. The governor's backyard: a seat-vote model of electoral reform for subnational multiparty races. The Journal of Politics 67 (2005) 1050-1074
7. Curtice J. The electoral system: biased to Blair?. Parliamentary Affairs 54 (2001) 803-814
8. Curtice J., and Steed M. Proportionality and exaggeration in the British electoral system. Electoral Studies 5 (1986) 209-228
9. Duverger M. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State (1954), Methuen, London
10. Gelman A., Katz J., and King G. Empirically evaluating the Electoral College. In: Creigler A.N., Just M.R., and McCaffery E.J. (Eds). Rethinking the Vote: The Politics and Prospects of American Electoral Reform (2004), Oxford University Press, New York 75-88
11. Gelman A., and King G. A unified method of evaluating electoral systems and districting plans. American Journal of Political Science 38 (1994) 514-554
12. Grofman B., Brunell T., and Campagna J. Distinguishing between the effects of swing ratio and bias on outcomes in the U.S. Electoral College, 1900-1992. Electoral Studies 16 (1997) 471-487
13. Grofman B., and King G. The future of partisan symmetry as a judicial test for partisan gerrymandering after LULAC v. Perry. Election Law Journal 6 (2007) 2-35. http://gking.harvard.edu/files/jp.pdf Available at
14. Gudgin G., and Taylor P.J. Seats, Votes and the Spatial Organization of Elections (1979), Pion, London
15. Johnston R.J., Pattie C.J., Dorling D.F.L., and Rossiter D.J. From Votes to Seats: The Operation of the UK Electoral System since 1945 (2001), Manchester University Press, Manchester
16. Johnston R.J., Pattie C.J., and Rossiter D.J. Disproportionality and bias in the results of the 2005 general election in Great Britain: evaluating the electoral system's impact. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 2 (2006) 37-54
17. Johnston R.J., Rossiter D.J., and Pattie C.J. Integrating and decomposing the sources of partisan bias: Brookes' method and the impact of redistricting in Great Britain. Electoral Studies 18, 367-378. ('Addendum'; Electoral Studies, 19 2000 (1999) 649-650
18. Johnston R.J., Rossiter D.J., Pattie C.J., and Dorling D.F.L. Labour electoral landslides and the changing efficiency of voting distributions. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS27 (2002) 336-361
19. King G. Electoral responsiveness and partisan bias in multiparty democracies. Legislative Studies Quarterly 15 (1990) 159-181
20. King G., Grofman B., Gelman A., and Katz J. Amicus brief in the case of Jackson v. Perry in the U.S. Perry in the U.S (2005). http://gking.harvard.edu/files/amicus-sym.pdf Supreme Court (No. 05-276). Available at
21. Monroe B.L. Bias and responsiveness in multiparty and multigroup representation. Paper presented at 1998 Political Methodology Summer Meeting (1998), University of California, San Diego. Available at http://polmeth.wustl.edu/workingpapers.php?text=electoral+systems&se archkeywords=T&order=dateposted
22. Mortimore, R., 1992. The Constituency Structure and the Boundary Commission: The Rules for the Redistribution of Seats and their Effect on the British Electoral System 1950-1987. DPhil thesis, University of Oxford.
23. Rossiter D.J., Johnston R.J., Pattie C.J., Dorling D.F.L., MacAllister I., and Tunstall H. Changing biases in the operation of the UK's electoral system, 1950-97. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 1 (1999) 133-164
24. Soper C.S., and Rydon J. Under-representation and electoral prediction. Australian Journal of Politics and History 4 (1958) 94-106