The function of the non-deictic that in English

Journal of Pragmatics

Volumn 33, Issue 7, 2001, Pages 1125-1155

  Yaguchi, Michiko ^a  

^a KOBE CITY UNIVERSITY OF FOREIGN STUDIES   (Japan)

Author keywords

(In)Valid information; Deictic that vs. non deictic that; English; Iconicity; Referentiality; Speaker's attitude and belief; Speaker's vantage point

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035402179     PISSN: 03782166     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00045-X     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Akatsuka Noriko. Conditionals and epistemic scale. Language. 61:1985;625-638.
2. Bolinger Dwight. That's that. 1972;Mouton, Hague.
3. Bolinger Dwight. Meaning and form. 1977;Longman, New York.
4. Brown Penelope, Levinson Stephen C. [1978] Politeness: Some universals in language usage. 1987;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
5. Elsness Johan. That or zero? A look at the choice of object clause connective in a corpus of American English. English Studies. 65:1984;519-533.
6. Givón Talmy. Evidentiality and epistemic space. Studies in Language. 6:1982;23-49.
7. Givón Talmy. Simone R., Isomorphism in the grammatical code. Iconicity in language. 1995;47-76 Benjamins, Amsterdam.
8. Haiman John. Iconic and economic motivation. Language. 59:1983;781-819.
9. Haiman John. Natural syntax. 1985;Cambridge University Press, New York.
10. Jackendoff Ray. Consciousness and the computational mind. 1989;The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
11. Johnson Mark. The body in the mind. 1987;The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
12. Kohno Morio. Two processing mechanisms in rhythm perception and listening comprehension. A report of research in 1989, Grant-in-Aid for Science Research on Priority Areas. 1990;The Ministry of Education, Science and Culture, Japan.
13. Kohno Morio. Tohkura Y., Bateson E.V., Sagisaka Y., Two mechanisms of processing sound sequences. Speech perception, production, and linguistic structure. 1992;284-293 Ohmsha, Tokyo.
14. Kohno Morio. Perceptual sense unit and echoic memory. International Journal of Psycholinguistics. 9:(1):1993;13-31.
15. Lakoff George. The invariance hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image-schema? Cognitive Linguistics. 1:(1):1990;39-74.
16. Lakoff George, Mark Johnson. Philosophy in the flesh: the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. 1999;Basic Books, New York.
17. Langacker Ronald W. Haiman J., Observations and speculations on subjectivity. Iconicity in syntax. 1985;109-150 Benjamins, Amsterdam.
18. Langacker Ronald W. Subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics. 1:(1):1990;5-38.
19. Langacker Ronald W. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. 2:1991;Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
20. Lyons John. Semantics. 2:1977;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
21. Lyons John. Linguistic semantics: An introduction. 1995;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
22. Quirk Randolph, Greenbaum Sidney, Leach Geoffrey, Svartvik Jan. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. 1985;Longman, London.
23. Storms G. That-clauses in modern English. English Studies. 47:1966;249-270.
24. Thompson Sandra, Mulac Anthony. Heine B., Traugott E., A quantitative perspective on the grammaticalization of epistemic parentheticals in English. Approaches to grammaticalization. 2:1991a;313-329 Benjamins, Amsterdam.
25. Thompson Sandra, Mulac Anthony. The discourse conditions for the use of the complementizer that in conversational English. Journal of Pragmatics. 15:1991b;237-251.