On the difference between mono-, holo-, and paraphyletic groups: A consistent distinction of process and pattern

Biological Journal of the Linnean Society

Volumn 94, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 217-220

  Envall, Mats ^a  

^a Manrax West ^*  (Sweden)

Author keywords

Ashlock; Cladistics; Conceptualization; Hennig; Linnean systematics; Phylogeny

Indexed keywords

CLADISTICS; PHYLOGENY; TAXONOMY;

EID: 43049141863     PISSN: 00244066     EISSN: 10958312     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2008.00984.x     Document Type: Short Survey

References (12)

1. Ashlock PD. 1971. Monophyly and associated terms. Systematic Zoology 20 : 63 69.
2. Ashlock PD. 1972. Monophyly again. Systematic Zoology 21 : 430 438.
3. Ashlock PD. 1974. The uses of cladistics. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 5 : 81 89.
4. Ashlock PD. 1979. An evolutionary systematist's view of classification. Systematic Zoology 28 : 441 450.
5. Farris JS. 1974. Formal definitions of paraphyly and polyphyly. Systematic Zoology 23 : 548 554.
6. Farris JS. 1990. Haeckel, history, and Hull. Systematic Zoology 39 : 81 88.
7. Hennig W. 1950. Grundzüge einer Theorie der phylogenetischen Systematik. Berlin : Deutcher Zentralverlag.
8. Hennig W. 1966. Phylogenetic systematics. Urbana, IL : University of Illinois Press.
9. Mayr E. 1974. Cladistic analysis or cladistic classification? Zeitschrift fur Zoologische Systematik und Evolutionforschung 12 : 94 128.
10. Mayr E. 1978. Origin and history of some terms in systematic and evolutionary biology. Systematic Zoology 27 : 83 88.
11. Mayr E, Bock WJ. 2002. Classifications and other ordering systems. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 40 : 169 194.
12. Nelson G. 1973. Monophyly again? A reply to D. Ashlock. Systematic Zoology 22 : 310 312.