Instrumental extractions using Thierry's spatulas: Evaluation of the risk of perineal laceration according to occiput position in operative deliveries;Extraction instrumentale par spatules de Thierry : évaluation du risque périnéal en fonction du dégagement

Journal de Gynecologie Obstetrique et Biologie de la Reproduction

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 276-282

  Courtois, L ^a   Becher, P ^a   Maticot Baptista, D ^a   Cour, A ^b   Zurlinden, B ^b   Millet, P ^b   Maisonnette Escot, Y ^a   Riethmuller, D ^a   Maillet, R ^a  

^a HÔPITAL SAINT JACQUES   (France)

^b Centre Hospitalier Montbéliard   (France)

Author keywords

Occiput posterior position; Perineal laceration; Thierry's spatulas

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTAL DELIVERY; LACERATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PERINEUM INJURY; PREGNANCY; RISK FACTOR;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; EXTRACTION, OBSTETRICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LABOR PRESENTATION; LACERATIONS; OBSTETRICAL FORCEPS; PERINEUM; PREGNANCY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 43049132853     PISSN: 03682315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2007.10.006     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. De Leeuw J.W., Struijk P.C., Vierhout M.E., and Wallenburg H.C. Risk factors for third degree perineal ruptures during delivery. BJOG 108 (2001) 383-387
2. Handa V.L., Danielsen B.H., and Gilbert W.M. Obstetric anal sphincter lacerations. Obstet Gynecol 98 (2001) 225-230
3. Rizk D.E., and Thomas L. Relationship between the length of the perineum and position of the anus and vaginal delivery in primigravidae. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 11 (2000) 79-83
4. Deering S.H., Carlson N., Stitely M., Allaire A.D., and Satin A.J. Perineal body length and lacerations at delivery. J Reprod Med 49 (2004) 306-310
5. Payne T.N., Carey J.C., and Rayburn W.F. Prior third- or fourth-degree perineal tears and recurrence risks. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 64 (1999) 55-57
6. Peleg D., Kennedy C.M., Merrill D., and Zlatnik F.J. Risk of repition of a severe perineal laceration. Obstet Gynecol 93 (1999) 1021-1024
7. Sultan A.H., Kamm M.A., Bartram C.I., and Hudson C.N. Anal sphincter trauma during instrumental delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 43 (1993) 263-270
8. Dandolu V., Chatwani A., Harmanli O., Floro C., Gaughan J.P., and Hernandez E. Risk factors for obstetrical anal sphincter lacerations. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 16 (2005) 304-307
9. Bodner-Adler B., Bodner K., Kaider A., Wagenbichler P., Leodolter S., Husslein P., et al. Risk factors for third-degree perineal tears in vaginal delivery, with an analysis of episiotomy types. J Reprod Med 46 (2001) 752-756
10. Hartmann K., Viswanathan M., Palmieri R., Gartlehner G., Thorp J., and Lohr K.N. Outcomes of routine episiotomy. A systematic review. JAMA 293 (2005) 2141-2148
11. Langer B., and Minetti A. Complications immédiates et à long terme de l'épisiotomie. (Recommandations pour la pratique clinique du CNGOF). J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 35 (2006) 1S59-1S67
12. Janni W., Schiessl B., Peschers U., Huber S., Strobl B., Hantschmann P., et al. The prognostic impact of a prolonged second stage of labor on maternal and fetal outcome. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 81 (2002) 214-221
13. Cheng Y.W., Hopkins L.M., and Caughey A.B. How long is too long: does a prolonged second stage of labor in nulliparous women affect maternal and neonatal outcomes?. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191 (2004) 933-938
14. Fitzpatrick M., McQuillan K., and O'Herlihy C. Influence of persistent occiput posterior position on delivery outcome. Obstet Gynecol 98 (2001) 1027-1031
15. Ponkey S.E., Cohen A.P., Heffner L.J., and Lieberman E. Persistent fetal occiput posterior position: obstetric outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 101 (2003) 915-920
16. Sizer A.R., and Nirmal D.M. Occipitoposterior position: associated factors and obstetric outcome in nulliparas. Obstet Gynecol 96 (2000) 749-752
17. Cheng Y.W., Shaffer B.L., and Caughey A.B. Associated factors and outcomes of persistent occiput posterior position: A retrospective cohort study from 1976 to 2001. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 19 (2006) 563-568
18. Martin-Laval J., Deturmeny G., and Zographos G. Notre expérience actuelle sur l'application des spatules de Thierry. Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet 53 (1958) 517-524
19. Guyomar J. Valeur obstétricale des spatules de Thierry. Résultats de 1000 applications. Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet 12 (1965) 775-783
20. Fournié A. Les applications de spatules de Thierry au CHU de Toulouse en 1988. Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet 85 (1990) 553-556
21. Maisonnette-Escot Y., Riethmuller D., Chevrière S., Becher P., Floret N., Zurlinden B., et al. L'extraction instrumentale par spatules de Thierry : étude de la morbidité maternofoetale. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 33 (2005) 208-212
22. De Troyer J., Bouvenot J., D'Ercole C., and Boubli L. Extraction instrumentale par spatules de Thierry : à propos de 166 cas. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 34 (2005) 795-801
23. Mazouni C., Bretelle F., Colette E., Heckenroth H., Bonnier P., and Gamerre M. Maternal and neonatal morbidity after first vaginal delivery using Thierry's spatulas. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 45 (2005) 405-409
24. Benavides L., Wu J.M., Hundley A.F., Ivester T.S., and Visco A.G. The impact of occiput posterior fetal head position on the risk of anal sphincter injury in forceps-assisted vaginal deliveries. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192 (2005) 1702-1706
25. Wu J.M., Williams K.S., Hundley A.F., Connolly A.M., and Visco A.G. Occiput posterior fetal head position increases the risk of anal sphincter injury in vacuum-assisted deliveries. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193 (2005) 525-529
26. Damron D.P., and Capeless E.L. Operative vaginal delivery: a comparison of forceps and vacuum for success rate and risk of rectal sphincter injury. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191 (2004) 907-910
27. Riethmuller D., Courtois L., and Maillet R. Pratique libérale versus restrictive. Existe-t-il des indications obstétricales spécifiques de l'épisiotomie ? (Recommandations pour la pratique clinique du CNGOF). J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 35 (2006) 1S32-1S39
28. Riethmuller D., Teffaud O., Eyraud J.L., Sautière J.L., Schaal J.P., and Maillet R. Pronostic maternel et fœtal dans les présentations en occipito-sacré. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 2 (1999) 41-47
29. e Ed., Masson.
30. Haddad B., Abirached F., Calvez G., and Cabrol D. La rotation manuelle des presentations du sommet en occipito-iliaque postérieure ou transverse : technique et intérêt. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 24 (1995) 181-188
31. Shaffer B.L., Cheng Y.W., Vargas J.E., Laros R.K., and Caughey A.B. Manual rotation of the fetal occiput: Predictors of success and delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 194 (2006) e7-e9
32. Cargill Y.M., MacKinnon C.J., Arsenault M.Y., Bartellas E., Daniels S., Gleason T., et al. Clinical Practice Obstetrics Committee. Guidelines for operative vaginal birth. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 26 (2004) 747-761