Maternal and neonatal morbidity after first vaginal delivery using Thierry's spatulas

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 45, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 405-409

  Mazouni, Chafika ^a,b   Bretelle, Florence ^a   Collette, Emmanuelle ^a   Heckenroth, Hélène ^a   Bonnier, Pascal ^a   Gamerre, Marc ^a  

^a ASSISTANCE PUBLIQUE HÔPITAUX DE MARSEILLE   (France)

^b Department of Gynecology ^*  (France)

Author keywords

Delivery; Instrumental delivery; Spatulas; Thierry's spatulas; Vaginal delivery

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FORCEPS; FORCEPS DELIVERY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL MORBIDITY; NATURAL CHILDBIRTH; NEWBORN MORBIDITY; NULLIPARA; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PERINEUM INJURY; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; URINE RETENTION; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

ADULT; BIRTH INJURIES; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; COHORT STUDIES; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; EXTRACTION, OBSTETRICAL; FEMALE; FRANCE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; INFANT MORTALITY; INFANT, NEWBORN; LOGISTIC MODELS; OBSTETRICAL FORCEPS; ODDS RATIO; PARITY; PERINEUM; POSTPARTUM HEMORRHAGE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PROBABILITY; PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; URINARY RETENTION;

EID: 29244445802     PISSN: 00048666     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2005.00450.x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Bartram CI. Third degree obstetric anal sphincter tears: risk factors and outcome of primary repair. BMJ 1994; 308: 887-891.
2. Zetterström JP, Lopez A, Anzen B, Dolk A, Norman M, Mellgren A. Anal incontinence after vaginal delivery: a prospective study in primiparous women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999; 106: 324-330.
3. Broekhuizen FF, Washington JM, Johnson F, Hamilton PR. Vacuum extraction versus forceps delivery: indications and complications, 1979-1984. Obstet Gynecol 1987; 69: 338-342.
4. Anger D. The Thierry's spatulas: Results of 736 applications. Gynecol Obstet. 1967; 66: 489-500.
5. Guyomar J. Obstetrical value of Thierry's spatulas: Results of 1000 applications. Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet. 1965; 60: 775-783.
6. Lloyd FP, Geisler HE, Lushbaugh H. Unarticulated forceps in operative obstetric. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1964; 90: 925-928.
7. Pizzigoni F, Albini A. The Thierry spatulas: their indication and use. Minerva Ginecol. 1976; 28: 407-415.
8. Perez JO. The spatulas of Thierry. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1957; 74: 1215-1217.
9. Ruf H, Merite G, Bossi G. Use of Thierry's spatulas as obstetrical forceps. Bull Fed Soc Gynecol Obstet Lang Fr. 1965; 17: 484-485.
10. Fournie A. The use of Thierry's spatula at the University Hospital Center in Toulouse in 1988. Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet. 1990; 85: 553-556.
11. Thierry E. Presentation of a new instrument in replacement of forceps. Bull Fed Soc Gynecol Obstet. 1950; 2: 283-285.
12. Donnelly V, Fynes M, Campbell D, Johnson H, O'Connell PR, O'Herlihy C. Obstetric events leading to anal sphincter damage. Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 92: 955-962.
13. Sultan AH, Johanson RB, Carter JE. Occult anal sphincter trauma following randomized forceps and vacuum delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1998; 61: 113-119.
14. Greis JB, Bieniarz J, Scommegna A. Comparison of maternal and fetal effects of vacuum extraction with forceps or cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol. 1981; 57: 571-577.
15. Kamm MA. Obstetric damage and faecal incontinence. Lancet. 1994; 344: 730-733.
16. Robertson PA, Laros RK, Zhao RL. Neonatal and maternal outcome in low-pelvic and mid-pelvic operative deliveries. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162: 1436-1444.
17. Camus M, Lefebvre G, Darbois Y. Facial paralysis of obstetrical origin. Etiology, evolution. Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet. 1986; 81: 145-147.
18. Towner D, Castro MA, Eby-Wilkens E, Gilbert WM. Effect of mode of delivery in nulliparous women on neonatal intracranial injury. N Engl J Med. 1999; 341: 1709-1714.
19. Bofill JA, Rust OA, Devidas M, Roberts WE, Morrison JC, Martin JN. Neonatal cephalohematoma from vacuum extraction. J Reprod Med. 1997; 42: 565-569.
20. Combs CA, Robertson PA, Laros RK Jr. Risk factors for third-degree and fourth-degree perineal lacerations in forceps and vacuum deliveries. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990; 163: 100-104.
21. Fournié E, Parant O. Thierry's spatulas. Encycl Med Chir. In: Obstétrique. Paris: Elsevier SAS press, 2003; Chp 095-A-10.
22. De Parades V, Etienney I, Thabut D, Beaulieu S, Tawk M, Assemekang B et al. Anal sphincter injury after forceps delivery: myth or reality? A prospective ultrasound study of 93 females. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004; 47: 24-34.
23. Sarfati R, Marechaud M, Magnin G. Comparison of blood loss during cesarean section and during vaginal delivery with episiotomy. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod. 1999; 28: 48-54.
24. Myers-Helfgott MG, Helfgott AW. Routine use of episiotomy in modern obstetrics. Should it be performed? Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1999; 26: 305-325.
25. Carley ME, Carley JM, Vasdev G, Lesnick TG, Webb MJ, Ramin KD, Lee RA. Factors that are associated with clinically overt postpartum urinary retention after vaginal delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 187: 430-433.
26. Lee SN, Lee CP, Tang OS, Wong WM. Postpartum urinary retention. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1999; 66: 287-288.
27. Ching-Chung L, Shuemi-Dhy C, Ling-Hong T, Ching-Chang H, Chao-Lun C, Po-Jen C. Postpartum urinary retention: assessment of contributing factors and long-term clinical impact. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002; 42: 365-368.
28. Andolf E, Iosif CS, Jorgensen C, Rydhstrom H. Insidious urinary retention after vaginal delivery: prevalence and symptoms at follow-up in a population-based study. Gynecol. Obstet Invest. 1994; 38: 51-53.