Contrasting and integrating social identity and interdependence approaches to intergroup discrimination in the minimal group paradigm

The Scope of Social Psychology: Theory and Applications

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 173-192

  Stroebe, Katherine ^a   Spears, Russell ^b   Lodewijkx, Hein ^c  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c OPEN UNIVERSITY OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 42949152100     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203965245     Document Type: Chapter

References (36)

1. Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. (1988). Comments on the motivational status of selfesteem in social identity and intergroup discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 317-334.
2. Bourhis, R. Y., Sachdev, I., & Gagnon, A. (1994). Intergroup research with the Tajfel matrices: Methodological notes. In M. P. Zanna & J. M. Olson (Eds.), The social psychology of prejudice: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 7, pp. 209-232). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
3. Diehl, M. (1990). The minimal group paradigm: Theoretical explanations and empirical findings. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 263-292). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
4. Gaertner, L., & Insko C. A. (2000). Intergroup discrimination in the minimal group paradigm: Categorization, reciprocation or fear? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 77-94.
5. Gagnon, A., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1996). Discrimination in the minimal group paradigm: Social identity or self interest? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1289-1301.
6. Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 161-178.
7. Hinkle, S., & Brown, R. J. (1990). Intergroup comparisons and social identity: Some links and lacunae. In D. Abrams & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances (pp. 48-70). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
8. Hogg, M. A., & Sunderland, J. (1991). Self-esteem and intergroup discrimination in the minimal group paradigm. British Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 51-62.
9. Horwitz, M., & Rabbie, J. M. (1982). Individuality and membership in the intergroup system. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 89-101). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10. Leonardelli, G. J., & Brewer, M. B. (2001). Minority and majority discrimination: When and why. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 468-485.
11. LeVine, R. A., & Campbell, D. T. (1972). Ethnocentrism. New York: Wiley.
12. Locksley, A., Ortiz, V., & Hepburn, C. (1980). Social categorization and discriminatory behavior: Extinguishing the minimal intergroup discrimination effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 773-783.
13. Lodewijkx, H. F. M., Rabbie J. M., & Syroit, J. E. M. M. (1999). Don't bite the hand that feeds you: Mediation of minimal group discrimination by reciprocal expectations. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 23, 28-41.
14. Long, K., & Spears, R. (1997). The self-esteem hypothesis revisited: Differentiation and the disaffected. In R. Spears, P. J. Oakes, N. Ellemers, & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 296-317). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
15. Mullen, B., Brown, R., & Smith, C. (1992). Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 103-122.
16. Oakes, P. J., & Turner, J. C. (1980). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour: Does minimal intergroup discrimination make social identity more positive? European Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 295-301.
17. Rabbie, J. M., & Horwitz, M. (1969). The arousal of ingroup-outgroup bias by a chance win or loss. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 269-277.
18. Rabbie, J. M., & Lodewijkx, H. F. M. (1994). Conflict and aggression: An individual-group continuum. Advances in Group Processes, 11, 139-174.
19. Rabbie, J. M., & Schot, J. (1990). Group behavior in the minimal group paradigm: Fact or fiction? In P. J. D. Drenth, J. A. Sergeant, & R. J. Takens (Eds.), European perspectives in psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 251-263). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
20. Rabbie, J. M., Schot, J., & Visser, L. (1989). Social identity theory: A conceptual and empirical critique from the perspective of a behavioral interaction model. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 171-202.
21. Rubin, M., & Hewstone, M. (1998). Social identity theory's self-esteem hypothesis: Areview and some suggestions for clarification. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 40-62.
22. Scheepers, D., Spears, R., Doosje, B., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2002). Integrating identity and instrumental approaches to intergroup differentiation: Different contexts, different motives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1455-1467.
23. Sherif, M. (1967). Group conflict and co-operation: Their social psychology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
24. Sober, E., & Wilson, D. S. (1998). Unto others: The evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25. Spears, R., Doosje, B., & Ellemers, N. (1999). Commitment and the context of social perception. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 59-83). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
26. Spears, R., Jetten, J., & Scheepers, D. (2002). Distinctiveness and the definition of collective self: A tripartite model. In A. Tesser, J. V. Wood, & D. A. Stapel (Eds.), Self and motivation: Emerging psychological perspectives (pp. 147-171). Lexington: APA.
27. Spears, R., Scheepers, D., Jetten, J., Doosje, B., Ellemers, N., & Postmes, T. (2004).Entitativity, group distinctiveness and social identity: Getting and using social structure. In V. Yzerbyt, C. M. Judd, & O. Corneille (Eds.), The psychology of group perception: Contributions to the study of homogeneity, entitativity and essentialism (pp. 293-316). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
28. St. Claire, L., & Turner, J. C. (1982). The role of demand characteristics in the social categorization paradigm. European Journal of Social Psychology, 12, 307-314.
29. Stroebe, K. E., Spears, R., & Lodewijkx, H. F. M. (2005). Do unto other as they do unto you: Reciprocity and social identification as determinants of ingroup favoritism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 831-845.
30. Tajfel, H., Flament, C. I., Billig, M. G., & Bundy, H. P. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149-178.
31. Turner, J. C. (1975). Social comparison and social identity: Some prospects for intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 5-34.
32. Turner, J. C. (1988). Comments on Doise's individual and social identities in intergroup relations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 113-116.
33. Turner, J. C. (1999). Some current issues in research on social identity and selfcategorization theories. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 6-34). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
34. Turner, J. C., Brown, R. J., & Tajfel, H. (1979). Social comparison and group interest in ingroup favouritism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 9, 187-204.
35. Yamagishi, T., Jin, N., & Kiyonari, T. (1999). Bounded generalized reciprocity: Ingroup boasting and ingroup favoritism. Advances in Group Processes, 16, 161-197.
36. Yamagishi, T., & Kiyonari, T. (2000). The group as container of generalized reciprocity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 62, 116-132.