Sequential power-dependence theory

Journal of Mathematical Sociology

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 110-128

  Buskens, Vincent ^a   Van De Rijt, Arnout ^b  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Exchange; Power; Sequentiality; Social networks

Indexed keywords

EID: 42949148587     PISSN: 0022250X     EISSN: 15455882     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00222500801931669     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bienenstock, E. J. & Bonacich, P. (1992). The core as a solution to exclusionary networks. Social Networks, 14, 231-243.
2. Braun, N. & Gautschi, T. (2006), A nash bargaining model for simple exchange networks. Social Networks, 28, 1-23.
3. Burke, P. J. (1997). An identity model for network exchange. American Sociological Review, 62, 134-150.
4. Cook, K. S. & Emerson, R. M. (1978). Power, equity and commitment in exchange networks. American Sociological Review, 43, 721-739.
5. Cook, K. S. & Yamagishi, T. (1992). Power in exchange networks: A power-dependence formulation. Social Networks, 14, 245-265.
6. Dogan, G., Van Assen, M. A. L. M., Van de Rijt, A., & Buskens, V. (2007). The Stability of Exchange Networks. Working paper.
7. Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27, 31-40.
8. Emerson, R. M. (1964). Power-dependence relations: Two experiments. Sociometry, 27, 282-298.
9. Emerson, R. M. (1972). Exchange theory: Part II: Exchange relations and networks. In J. Berger, M. Zelditch, & B. Anderson, (eds.), Sociological Theories in Progress (pp. 58-87), Vol. 2, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
10. Fehr, E. & Gintis, H. (2007). Human motivation and social cooperation: Experimental and analytical foundations. Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 43-64.
11. Friedkin, N. E. (1995). The incidence of exchange networks. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58, 213-222.
12. Girard, D. & Borch, C. A. (2003). Optimal seek simplified. Current Research in Social Psychology, 8, 225-241.
13. Horn, R. & Johnson, C. (1994). Topics in Matrix Analysis, New York: Cambridge University Press.
14. Markovsky, B., Willer, D., & Patton, T. (1988). Power relations in exchange networks. American Sociological Review, 53, 220-236.
15. McGrimmon, T. & Dilks, L. (2005). Exploring the Sequencing Effect in Exchange Networks. Working paper.
16. Nash, J. (1953). Two-person cooperative games. Econometrica, 21, 128-140.
17. Simpson, B. & Willer, D. (1999). A new method for finding power structures. In D. Willer, (ed.), Network Exchange Theory (pp. 270-284). Westport, CT: Praeger.
18. Stolte, J. & Emerson, R. M. (1977). Structural inequality: Position and power in exchange structures. In R. Hamblin & J. Kunkel, (eds.), Behavioral Theory in Sociology (pp. 117-138). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
19. Varga, R. S. (1962). Matrix Iterative Analysis, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
20. Van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2001). Essays on Actor Models in Exchange Networks and Social Dilemmas, Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers.
21. Willer, D. (1999). Network Exchange Theory, New York: Greenwood.
22. Willer, D. & Anderson, B. (1981). Networks, Exchange and Coercion: The Elementary Theory and Its Applications, New York: Elsevier.
23. Willer, D. & Emanuelson, P. (2005). Testing Ten Theories. Working paper.
24. Yamaguchi, K. (1996). Power in networks of substitutable and complementary exchange relations: A rational choice model and an analysis of power centralization. American Sociological Review, 61, 308-332.