Reliability analysis of a sheet metal forming process using Monte Carlo analysis and metamodels

Journal of Materials Processing Technology

Volumn 202, Issue 1-3, 2008, Pages 255-268

  Jansson, T ^a,b   Nilsson, L ^a   Moshfegh, R ^a,b  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b SWEREA IVF   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Monte carlo analysis; Reliability; Sheet metal forming; Springback; Thickness variation

Indexed keywords

MONTE CARLO METHODS; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; SHEET METAL;

SPRINGBACK; THICKNESS VARIATION;

METAL FORMING;

EID: 42949133266     PISSN: 09240136     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.09.005     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Hallquist J.O. LS-DYNA Theoretical Manual (1998), Livermore Software Technology Corp., Livermore
2. Haldar A., and Mahadevan S. Reliability Assessment Using Stochastic Finite Element Analysis (2000), John Wiley, New York
3. Jansson T., Andersson A., and Nilsson L. Optimization of draw-in for an automotive sheet metal part-an evaluation using surrogate models and response surfaces. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 159 (2005) 426-434
4. Kleiber M., Rojek J., and Stocki R. Reliability assessment for sheet metal forming operations. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 191 (2002) 4511-4532
5. Kleiber M., Knabel J., and Rojek J. Response surface method for probabilistic assessment of metal forming failures. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 60 (2004) 51-61
6. Myers R., and Montgomery D. Response Surface Methodology (1995), John Wiley, New York
7. Redhe M., Forsberg J., Jansson T., Marklund P.-O., and Nilsson L. Using the response surface methodology and the D-optimality criterion in crashworthiness related problems. Struct. Multidisc. Optim. 24 3 (2002) 185-194
8. Stander N., Craig K., and Roux W. LS-OPT User's Manual v. 2.2 (2004), Livermore Software Technology Corporation, Livermore