Compensatory properties of visual information in the control of isometric force

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 70, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 306-313

  Hong, S Lee ^a   Brown, Amber J ^b   Newell, Karl M ^b  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; FINGER; HUMAN; MALE; MUSCLE ISOMETRIC CONTRACTION; PROPRIOCEPTION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SIGNAL PROCESSING; TOUCH; UNCERTAINTY; VISION;

ADULT; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; FINGERS; HUMANS; ISOMETRIC CONTRACTION; MALE; PROPRIOCEPTION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TOUCH; UNCERTAINTY; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 42949089461     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/PP.70.2.306     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. ASSAIANTE, C., MARCHAND, A. R., & AMBLARD, B. (1989). Discrete visual samples may control locomotor equilibrium and foot positioning in man. Journal of Motor Behavior, 21, 72-91.
2. BELTRAMI, E. (1999). What is random? Chance and order in mathematics and life. New York: Copernicus.
3. BEUTER, A., HAVERKAMP, H., GLASS, L., & CARRIERE, L. (1995). Effect of manipulating visual feedback parameters on eye and finger movements. International Journal of Neuroscience, 83, 281-294.
4. CARLTON, L. G. (1992). Visual processing time and the control of movement. In L. Proteau & D. Elliott (Eds.), Vision and motor control (pp. 3-31). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
5. DE RUYTER VAN STEVENINCK, R., BIALEK, W., POTTERS, M., CARLSON, R. H., & LEWEN, G. D. (1996). Adaptive movement computation by the blowfly visual system. In D. L. Waltz (Ed.), Natural and artificial parallel computation: Proceedings of the Fifth NEC Research Symposium (pp. 21-41). Philadelphia: SIAM.
6. DESMURGET, M., & GRAFTON, S. (2000). Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 423-431.
7. ELLIOTT, D. (1990). Intermittent visual pickup and goal directed movement: A review. Human Movement Science, 9, 531-548.
8. ELLIOTT, D., ZUBEREC, S., & MILGRAM, P. (1994). The effects of periodic visual occlusion on ball catching. Journal of Motor Behavior, 26, 113-122.
9. FITTS, P. M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 381-391.
10. JAGACINSKI, R. J., & FLACH, J. M. (2003). Control theory for humans: Quantitative approaches to modeling performance. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. LANDIS, C. (1954). Determinants of the critical flicker-fusion threshold. Physiological Review, 34, 259-286.
12. MIALL, R. C. (1996). Task-dependent changes in the visual feedback control: A frequency analysis of human manual tracking. Journal of Motor Behavior, 28, 125-135.
13. NEWELL, K. M., DEUTSCH, K. M., SOSNOFF, J. J., & Mayer-KRESS, G. (2006). Variability in motor output as noise: A default and erroneous proposition? In K. Davids, S. Bennett, & K. Newell (Eds.), Movement system variability (pp. 3-22). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
14. NEWELL, K. M., & KENNEDY, J. A. (1978). Knowledge of results and children's motor learning. Developmental Psychology, 14, 531-536.
15. NEWELL, K. M., & MCDONALD, P. V. (1994). Information, coordination modes, and control in a prehensile force task. Human Movement Science, 13, 375-392.
16. PINCUS, S. M. (1991). Approximate entropy as a measure of system complexity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 88, 2297-2301.
17. ROBERTSON, S., COLLINS, J., ELLIOTT, D., & STARKES, J. (1994). The influence of skill and intermittent vision on dynamic balance. Journal of Motor Behavior, 26, 333-339.
18. ROGERS, C. A., JR. (1974). Feedback precision and postfeedback interval duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 604-608.
19. SHANNON, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379-423.
20. SHERIDAN, T. B., & FERRELL, W. R. (1974). Man-machine systems: Information, control, and decision models of human performance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. SLIFKIN, A. B., & NEWELL, K. M. (1999). Noise, information transmission, and force variability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 837-851.
22. SLIFKIN, A. B., VAILLANCOURT, D. E., & NEWELL, K. M. (2000). In-termittency in the control of continuous force production. Journal of Neurophysiology, 84, 1708-1718.
23. SOSNOFF, J. J., & NEWELL, K. M. (2005a). Intermittency of visual information and the frequency of rhythmical force production. Journal of Motor Behavior, 37, 325-334.
24. SOSNOFF, J. J., & NEWELL, K. M. (2005b). Intermittent visual information and the multiple time scales of visual motor control of continuous isometric force production. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 335-344.
25. SOSNOFF, J. J., & NEWELL, K. M. (2006). Information processing limitations with aging in the scaling of isometric force. Experimental Brain Research, 170, 423-432.
26. STEPHENS, J. A., & TAYLOR, A. (1974). The effect of visual feedback on physiological muscle tremor. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 36, 457-464.
27. VAILLANCOURT, D. E., HAIBACH, P. S., & NEWELL, K. M. (2006). Visual angle is the critical variable mediating gain-related effects in manual control. Experimental Brain Research, 173, 742-750.
28. VAN BEERS, R. I., BARADUC, P., & WOLPERT, D. M. (2002). Role of uncertainty in sensorimotor control. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 357, 1137-1145.
29. WOODWORTH, R. S. (1899). The accuracy of voluntary movement. Psychological Review, 3, 1-119.