Mixture modeling approach to flow cytometry data

Cytometry Part A

Volumn 73, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 421-429

  Boedigheimer, Michael J ^a   Ferbas, John ^a  

^a AMGEN INC   (United States)

Author keywords

Automated data analysis; Flow cytometry; Gaussian mixture modeling; Immunophenotyping

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; B LYMPHOCYTE; BIOINFORMATICS; CELL SUSPENSION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FLOW CYTOMETRY; FLUORESCENCE ANGIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS; TECHNIQUE;

ALGORITHMS; B-LYMPHOCYTE SUBSETS; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FLOW CYTOMETRY; HUMANS; IMMUNOPHENOTYPING; LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS, SYSTEMIC; MODELS, STATISTICAL;

EID: 42949083636     PISSN: 15524922     EISSN: 15524930     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.20553     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Rieseberg M, Kasper C, Reardon KF, Scheper T. Flow cytometry in biotechnology. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2001;56:350-360.
2. Nicholson JK, Hubbbar M, Jones BM. Use of CD45 fluorescence and side-scatter characteristics for gating lymphocytes when using the whole blood lysis procedure and flow cytometry. Cytometry 1996;26:16-21.
3. Schenker EL, Hultin LE, Bauer KD, Ferbas J, Margolick JB, Giorgi JV. Evaluation of dual-color flow cytometry immunophenotyping panel in multicenter quality assurance program. Cytometry 1993;14:307-317.
4. Rosa SCD, Herzenberg LA, Herzenberg LA, Roederer M. 11-color, 13-parameter flow cytometry: Identification of human naive T cells by phenotype, function, and T-cell receptor diversity Nat Med 2001;7:245-248.
5. Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman JH. The Elements of Statistical Learning. New York: Springer Verlag; 2001.
6. Ferbas J, Wallace DJ, Weisman MH, Belouski SS, Kesslak JP, Vincent M, Zack D, Hendricks L, Chung J. A systematic analysis of circulating B cell populations in healthy and SLE subjects. Ann Rheum Dis 2006;65:584.
7. Bombardier C, Gladman DD, Urowitz MB, Caron D, Chang CH. Derivation of the SLEDAI. A disease activity index for lupus patients. Arthritis Rheum 1992;35:630-640.
8. McCoy JP. Preparation of cells from blood. In: Darzynkiewicz Z, Robinson JP, Crissman HA, editors. Methods in Cell Biology, 3rd ed. San Diego: Academic Press; 2001. p 214.
9. + T lymphocytes as a biological calibrator. Cytometry 1998;33:123-132.
10. Seamer LC, Bagwell CB, Barden L, Redelman D, Salzman GC, Wood JC, Murphy RF. Proposed new data file standard for flow cytometry. Version FCS 3.0. Cytometry 1997;28:118-122.
11. Dempster NMLAP, Rubin DB. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM-algorithm. J R Stat Soc B 1997;39:1-38.
12. Vlassis N, Likas A. A greedy EM algorithm for Gaussian mixture learning. Neural Process Lett 2002;15:77-87.
13. Loken MR, Brosnan JM, Bach BA, Ault KA. Establishing optimal lymphocyte gates for immunophenotyping by flow cytometry. Cytometry 1990;11:453-459.
14. Costa ES, Arroyo ME, Pedreira CE, Garcia-Marcos MA, Tabernero MD, Almeida J, Orfao A. A new automated flow cytometry data analysis approach for the diagnostic screening of neoplastic B-cell disorders in peripheral blood samples with absolute lymphocytosis. Leukemia 2006;20:1221-1230.
15. Chaudhuri P, Marron J. SiZer for exploration of structures of curves. J Acoust Soc Am 1999;94:807-823.
16. high plasma cells and disease activity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 2003;48:1332-1342.
17. Box GEP, Cox DR. An analysis of transformations. J R Stat Soc B 1964;26:211-252.
18. Xu L, Jordan MI. On convergence properties of the EM algorithm for Gaussian mixtures. Neural Comput 1996;8:129-151.
19. Biernacki C, Celeux G, Govaert G. Choosing starting values for the EM algorithm for getting the highest likelihood in multivariate Gaussian mixture models. Comput Stat Data Anal 2003;41:561-575.
20. Figueiredo MAT, Jain AK. Unsupervised learning of finite mixture models. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine lntell 2002:24;351-396.
21. Verbeek JJ, Vlassis N, Kröse BJA. Efficient greedy learning of Gaussian mixture models. Neural Comput 2003;15:469-485.
22. Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt CD, Vecchi MP. Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 1983;220:671-680.
23. Goldberg DE. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley Professional; 1989.
24. Titsias MK, Likas A. Mixture of experts classification using a hierarchical mixture model. Neural Comput 2002;14:2221-2244.