Superconducting phase qubit coupled to a nanomechanical resonator: Beyond the rotating-wave approximation

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 70, Issue 5 A, 2004, Pages

  Sornborger, Andrew T ^a   Cleland, Andrew N ^b   Geller, Michael R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA PROCESSING; ELECTRODYNAMICS; ELECTROMAGNETISM; ERRORS; HAMILTONIANS; JOSEPHSON JUNCTION DEVICES; NANOSTRUCTURED MATERIALS; NATURAL FREQUENCIES; OPTICAL RESONATORS; PROBABILITY; QUANTUM THEORY;

ELECTROMAGNETIC CAVITY; HARMONIC OSCILLATOR; NANOMECHANICAL RESONATOR; QUANTUM GATES; QUANTUM INFORMATION PROCESSING; ROTATING-WAVE APPROXIMATION (RWA);

QUANTUM OPTICS;

EID: 42749107825     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.70.052315     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Y. Nakamura, Yu. A. Pashkin, and J. S. Tsai, Nature (London) 398, 786 (1999).
2. D. Vion et al., Science 296, 886 (2002).
3. Y. Yu, S. Han, X. Chu, S.-I. Chu, and Z. Wang, Science 296, 889 (2002).
4. J. M. Martinis, S. Nam, J. Aumentado, and C. Urbina, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 117901 (2002).
5. A. J. Berkley, H. Xu, R. C. Ramos, M. A. Gubrud, F. W. Strauch, P. R. Johnson, J. R. Anderson, A. J. Dragt, C. J. Lobb, and F. C. Wellstood, Science 300, 1548 (2003).
6. T. Yamamoto, Yu. A. Pashkin, O. Astafiev, Y. Nakamura, and J. S. Tsai, Nature (London) 425, 941 (2003).
7. A. Shnirman, G. Schön, and Z. Hermon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2371 (1997).
8. Y. Makhlin, G. Schön, and A. Shnirman, Nature (London) 398, 305 (1999).
9. O. Buisson and F. W. J. Hekking, in Macroscopic Quantum Coherence and Quantum Computing, edited by D. V. Averin, B. Ruggiero, and P. Silvestrini (Kluwer, New York, 2001), p. 137.
10. A. Yu. Smirnov and A. M. Zagoskin, e-print cond-mat/0207214.
11. A. Biais, A. M. van den Brink, and A. M. Zagoskin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 127901 (2003).
12. F. Plastina and G. Falci, Phys. Rev. B 67, 224514 (2003).
13. S.-L. Zhu, Z. D. Wang, and K. Yang, Phys. Rev. A 68, 034303 (2003).
14. S. M. Girvin, R.-S. Huang, A. Biais, A. Wallraff, and R. J. Schelkopf, e-print cond-mat/0310670.
15. A. Blais, R.-S. Huang, A. Wallraff, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schelkopf, Phys. Rev. A 69, 062320 (2004).
16. A. N. Cleland and M. R. Geller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 070501 (2004).
17. M. R. Geller and A. N. Cleland, e-print quant-ph/0409179.
18. F. Marquardt and C. Bruder, Phys. Rev. B 63, 054514 (2001).
19. F. Plastina, R. Fazio, and G. M. Palma, Phys. Rev. B 64, 113306 (2001).
20. F. W. J. Hekking, O. Buisson, F. Balestro, and M. G. Vergniory, e-print cond-mat/0201284.
21. M. O. Scully and M. S. Zubairy, Quantum Optics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1997).
22. D. Aharonov and M. Ben-Or, in Proceedings of the 29th Annual ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing (ACM Press, New York, 1997), p. 176.
23. D. Gottesman, Ph.D. thesis, California Institute of Technology, 1997.
24. A. Kitaev, Quantum Communication, Computing and Measurement (Plenum Press, New York, 1997), p. 181.
25. J. Preskill, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 454, 385 (1998).
26. P. Meystre and M. Sargent, Elements of Quantum Optics (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1990).
27. If the higher lying junction states m=2,3,. are not initially occupied and the resonator also starts in the ground state, only the qubit states m=0,1 are coupled by "energy-conserving" terms. Therefore, the higher-lying junction states m=2,3,. can be treated with ordinary perturbation theory in g.
28. σ (t) by a series or cumulant expansion in V leads to a result that is valid only for short times.
29. res.