-
7
-
-
0141788985
-
-
L. M. Kettle, H.-S. Goan, S. C. Smith, C. J. Wellard, L. C. L. Hollenberg, and C. I. Pakes, Phys. Rev. B 68, 075317 (2003).
-
(2003)
Phys. Rev. B
, vol.68
, pp. 075317
-
-
Kettle, L.M.1
Goan, H.-S.2
Smith, S.C.3
Wellard, C.J.4
Hollenberg, L.C.L.5
Pakes, C.I.6
-
8
-
-
0348223779
-
-
G. D. J. Smit, S. Rogge, J. Caro, and T. M. Klapwijk, Phys. Rev. B 68, 193302 (2003).
-
(2003)
Phys. Rev. B
, vol.68
, pp. 193302
-
-
Smit, G.D.J.1
Rogge, S.2
Caro, J.3
Klapwijk, T.M.4
-
13
-
-
33646641831
-
-
G. M. Guichar, C. Sebenne, F. Proix, and M. Balkanski, Phys. Rev. B 5, 422 (1972).
-
(1972)
Phys. Rev. B
, vol.5
, pp. 422
-
-
Guichar, G.M.1
Sebenne, C.2
Proix, F.3
Balkanski, M.4
-
16
-
-
36149015145
-
-
G. Feher, Phys. Rev. 114, 1219 (1959).
-
(1959)
Phys. Rev.
, vol.114
, pp. 1219
-
-
Feher, G.1
-
19
-
-
33646666341
-
-
note
-
i notation in all cases, following the conventions of Ref. 20. Moreover, we use the Schönfliess symbols to denote the crystallographic point groups (Ref. 20).
-
-
-
-
20
-
-
0004024194
-
-
MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
-
G. F. Koster, J. O. Dimmock, R. G. Wheeler, and H. Satz, Properties of the Thirty-Two Point Groups (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1963).
-
(1963)
Properties of the Thirty-Two Point Groups
-
-
Koster, G.F.1
Dimmock, J.O.2
Wheeler, R.G.3
Satz, H.4
-
23
-
-
33646667298
-
-
note
-
It is known from group theory that the reduction of a representation containing more than one instance of the same irreducible representation is not uniquely determined.
-
-
-
-
25
-
-
33646663327
-
-
note
-
l level cannot have any dependence on the direction of the field.
-
-
-
-
26
-
-
33646666918
-
-
cond-mat/0309147 (unpublished)
-
B. Golding and M. I. Dykman, cond-mat/0309147 (unpublished).
-
-
-
Golding, B.1
Dykman, M.I.2
-
27
-
-
33646642724
-
-
note
-
Note that a substitutional site in silicon has no inversion symmetry and therefore no definite parity. This is essential for the occurrence of a linear Stark effect in an isolated level.
-
-
-
-
28
-
-
33646643886
-
-
note
-
In contrast to our treatment of donors, we will use the technique of effective Hamiltonians to derive the matrices for acceptor levels.
-
-
-
-
30
-
-
33646649878
-
-
note
-
Note that there is a mistake in the corresponding expression in Ref. 29, where the last term between the square brackets is missing.
-
-
-
-
31
-
-
33646655113
-
-
note
-
At the time of these experiments (1967), the origin of the peaks was not yet resolved.
-
-
-
-
34
-
-
33646649517
-
-
note
-
∝v can be seen to cross each other in Fig. 3. This is, however, no violation of the noncrossing rule, since for this specific problem there exists an additional constant of motion that is associated with the separability of the Hamiltonian (Ref. 35).
-
-
-
-
36
-
-
33646646007
-
-
note
-
This lifetime is solely due to the possibility of ionization and is unrelated to (radiative or nonradiative) transitions from an excited level to a lower state.
-
-
-
|