-
12
-
-
0035893720
-
-
S. Borsányi, A. Patkós, D. Sexty, and Zs. Szép, Phys. Rev. D 64, 125011 (2001).
-
(2001)
Phys. Rev. D
, vol.64
, pp. 125011
-
-
Borsányi, S.1
Patkós, A.2
Sexty, D.3
Szép, Zs.4
-
23
-
-
33645053347
-
-
Although the definitions of the Ζ functions (11) for the dynamical parameters and the renormalization factors (B12) are different, the explicit expressions of the Ζ functions are in agreement with [19]
-
Although the definitions of the Ζ functions (11) for the dynamical parameters and the renormalization factors (B12) are different, the explicit expressions of the Ζ functions are in agreement with [19].
-
-
-
-
24
-
-
33645070650
-
-
After finishing our calculations we have been informed by V. Dohm of unpublished calculations by K. Oerding. His results for the dynamical Ζ functions agree with ours
-
After finishing our calculations we have been informed by V. Dohm of unpublished calculations by K. Oerding. His results for the dynamical Ζ functions agree with ours.
-
-
-
-
25
-
-
33645060052
-
-
We use, however, also in this case the ε-expanded fixed-point values of the static couplings. The two-loop β function for u has no real solution and one had to use the Borel-summed β function, which is not known for general n
-
We use, however, also in this case the ε-expanded fixed-point values of the static couplings. The two-loop β function for u has no real solution and one had to use the Borel-summed β function, which is not known for general n.
-
-
-
-
28
-
-
33645064376
-
-
The parameter c has been calculated in three-loop order in [13] and corrected by Antonov and Vasil'ev [29], The reason why the result of [29] is more reliable is the fact that c would be negative for d<3.70 (ε>0.296) in [13], whereas this happens only for d<1.35 (ε>2.65) in [29]
-
The parameter c has been calculated in three-loop order in [13] and corrected by Antonov and Vasil'ev [29], The reason why the result of [29] is more reliable is the fact that c would be negative for d<3.70 (ε>0.296) in [13], whereas this happens only for d<1.35 (ε>2.65) in [29].
-
-
-
-
31
-
-
33645084373
-
-
Note that in [18] the dynamical critical exponent z for model A has been missprinted due to an erroneous minus sign before Cη
-
Note that in [18] the dynamical critical exponent z for model A has been missprinted due to an erroneous minus sign before Cη.
-
-
-
-
32
-
-
33645086238
-
-
In [13] a renormalization with normalization conditions has been used. Therefore, in the comparison with our renormalization scheme using the minimal subtraction scheme in the ε functions of [13] e has to be set to zero
-
In [13] a renormalization with normalization conditions has been used. Therefore, in the comparison with our renormalization scheme using the minimal subtraction scheme in the ε functions of [13] e has to be set to zero.
-
-
-
-
34
-
-
85104369179
-
-
edited by C. Domb and M. S. Green (Academic, New York
-
E. Brezin, J. C. Le Guillou, and J. Zinn-Justin, in Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena, edited by C. Domb and M. S. Green (Academic, New York, 1976), Vol. 4.
-
(1976)
Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena
, vol.4
-
-
Brezin, E.1
Le Guillou, J.C.2
Zinn-Justin, J.3
-
38
-
-
0031315876
-
-
D. Stauffer, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 8, 1263 (1997); P. Sen, S. Dasgupta, and D. Stauffer, Eur. Phys. J. B 1, 107 (1998); B. Zheng and H. J. Luo, Phys. Rev. E 63, 066130 (2001).
-
(1997)
Int. J. Mod. Phys. C
, vol.8
, pp. 1263
-
-
Stauffer, D.1
-
39
-
-
0031617491
-
-
D. Stauffer, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 8, 1263 (1997); P. Sen, S. Dasgupta, and D. Stauffer, Eur. Phys. J. B 1, 107 (1998); B. Zheng and H. J. Luo, Phys. Rev. E 63, 066130 (2001).
-
(1998)
Eur. Phys. J. B
, vol.1
, pp. 107
-
-
Sen, P.1
Dasgupta, S.2
Stauffer, D.3
-
40
-
-
45849155105
-
-
D. Stauffer, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 8, 1263 (1997); P. Sen, S. Dasgupta, and D. Stauffer, Eur. Phys. J. B 1, 107 (1998); B. Zheng and H. J. Luo, Phys. Rev. E 63, 066130 (2001).
-
(2001)
Phys. Rev. E
, vol.63
, pp. 066130
-
-
Luo, B.1
Zheng, H.J.2
|