Two-order-parameter description of liquids: Critical phenomena and phase separation of supercooled liquids

Journal of Physics Condensed Matter

Volumn 11, Issue 15, 1999, Pages

  Tanaka, Hajime ^a,b  

^a INSTITUTE OF INDUSTRIAL SCIENCE   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001226429     PISSN: 09538984     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/11/15/005     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Chaikin P M and Lubensky T C 1995 Principles of Condensed Matter Physics (Cambridge: Cambridge Unversity Press)
2. Angell C A 1995 Science 267 1924
3. Ediger M, Angell C A and Nagel S R 1996 J. Phys. Chem. 100 13 200
4. Debenedetti P G 1997 Metastable Liquids (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press)
5. Debye P and Bueche A M 1949 J. Appl. Phys. 20 518
6. Fischer E W 1993 Physica A 201 183 and references therein
7. Wang C H and Fischer E W 1996 J. Chem. Phys. 105 7316
8. Aasland S and McMillan P F 1994 Nature 369 633 and references therein
9. Stanley H E, Cruz L, Harrington S T, Poole P H, Sastry S, Sciortino E, Starr F W and Zhang R 1997 Physica A 236 19
10. Harrington S, Zang R, Poole P H, Sciortino F and Stanley H E 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 2409
11. This compressibility sum rule must be satisfied for all liquids at equilibrium.
12. The 'apparent' violation of the compressibility sum rule is suggestive of the existence of an extra order parameter.
13. c to represent both a critical point and a mean-field spinodal temperature.
14. Frank F C 1952 Proc. R. Soc. A 215 43
15. Kleman M and Sadoc J F 1979 J. Physique Lett. 40 L569
16. Nelson D R 1983 Phys. Rev. B 28 5515
17. Cohen C, Fleming P D and Gibbs J H 1976 Phys. Rev. B 13 866
18. Glarum S J 1960 J. Chem. Phys. 33 1371
19. Blender J T and Shlesinger M F 1992 J. Phys. Chem. 96 3970
20. Yeo J and Mazenko G 1995 Phys. Rev. E 51 5752
21. Tanaka H 1998 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 10 L207
22. (Tanaka 1997 Los Alamos Preprint cond-mat/9706174)
23. Tanaka 1997 Los Alamos Preprint cond-mat/9706176
24. Tanaka H 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 5750
25. Tanaka H 1999 J. Chem. Phys. submitted
26. lm (see Nelson's paper in reference [14] for definitions).
27. Hohenberg P C and Halperin B I 1976 Rev. Mod. Phys. 49 435
28. Hohenberg P C and Nelson D R 1979 Phys. Rev. B 20 2665
29. Fischer H P and Dieterich W 1997 Phys. Rev. E 56 6909 and references therein
30. Unlike in the case of reference [19], we do not consider crystallization here. Thus, the meaning of the Hamiltonian is essentially different from that in reference [19], although they look similar.
31. This should not be confused with α-relaxation.
32. Kobayashi K K 1969 J. Phys. Soc. Japan 27 1116
33. Schneider T, Brout R, Thomas H and Feder J 1970 Phys. Rev. Lett. 25 1423
34. Kirkpatrick T R 1985 Phys. Rev. A 32 3130
35. Kirkpatrick T R and Thirumalai D 1989 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 22 L149
36. It may be reasonable to assume that the local bond ordering directly (not via density) affects the refractive index n if we consider its unique local symmetry and the electronic nature of bonding.
37. Munakata T 1977 J. Phys. Soc. Japan 43 1723
38. g.
39. 0 becomes a saddle point in this case.
40. More strictly, however, spatial fluctuations in density and bond order are coupled, according to the direction of the associated eigenvector, which changes with q.