Low glycaemic index, or low glycaemic load, diets for diabetes mellitus

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Volumn , Issue 4, 2006, Pages

  Thomas, Diana E ^a   Elliott, E J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL TRIAL; DATA EXTRACTION; DIABETES MELLITUS; DIABETIC DIET; GLYCEMIC INDEX; GLYCEMIC LOAD; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; QUALITY CONTROL; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

EID: 42749106843     PISSN: 1469493X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006296     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. American Diabetes Association. Nutrition Principles and Recommendations in Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2004;27(1 Suppl):S36-46.
2. Goldstein DE, Little RR, Lorenz RA, Malone JI, Nathan DM, Peterson CM. Tests of Glycemia in Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2004;27(1 Suppl):S91-3.
3. Brand-Miller J, Hayne S, Petocz P, Colagiuri S. Low-Glycemic Index Diets in the Management of Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2003;26(8): 2261-7.
4. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 37-46, 1960.
5. Cooper H, Hedges LV. The handbook of research synthesis. NewYork: Russell Safe Foundation, 1994.
6. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. The New England journal of medicine 1993;329:977-86.
7. Bantle JP, Beebe C, Brunzell JD, Chiasson JL, Garg A, Franz MJ, et al. Nutrition principles and recommendations in diabetes. Diabetes Care 2004;27(1 Suppl):S36-46.
8. Goldstein DE, Little RR, Lorenz RA, Malone JI, Nathan DM, Peterson CM. Tests of glycemia in diabetes (Technical Review). Diabetes Care 1995;18:896-909.
9. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a metaanalysis. Statistics in medicine 2002;21:1539-58.
10. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysis. BMJ 2003;327:557-60.
11. Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 4.2.5 [updated May 2005]. In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2005. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
12. Jenkins DJ, Wolever TM, Taylor RH, Barker H, Fielden H, Baldwin JM, et al. Glycemic index of foods: a physiological basis for carbohydrate exchange. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1981;34(3): 362-6.
13. Kiens B, Richter EA. Types of carbohydrate in an ordinary diet affect insulin action and muscle substrates in humans. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1996;63(1):47-53.
14. Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup DF. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses. Lancet 1999;354(9193):1896-900.
15. Silink M. Childhood diabetes: a global perspective.Hormone Research 2002;57 Suppl 1:1-5.
16. Tang JL, Liu JL. Misleading funnel plot for detection of bias in metaanalysis. Journal of clinical epidemiology 2000;53(5):477-84.
17. Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. BMJ 1998;317:703-13.
18. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS)Group Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet 1998;352:837- 53.
19. Winocour P, Bhatnagar D, Kalsi P, Hillier V, Anderson D. Relative clinical usefulness of glycosylated serum albumin and fructosamine during short-term changes in glycemic control in IDDM. Diabetes Care 1988;12:665-72.