Using overlap and funnel sampling to obtain accurate free energies from nonequilibrium work measurements

Physical Review E - Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and Related Interdisciplinary Topics

Volumn 69, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 4-

  Lu, Nandou ^a   Wu, D ^b   Woolf, Thomas B ^a   Kofke, David A ^b  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b the State University of New York   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE;

BIOPHYSICS; CHEMISTRY; PROCEDURES; STATISTICAL MODEL; THERMODYNAMICS; TIME; WORK;

ADENOSINE; BIOPHYSICS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; THERMODYNAMICS; TIME FACTORS; WORK;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA REDUCTION; HEURISTIC METHODS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES; SWITCHING;

BOOTSTRAP METHODS; FREE-ENERGY PERTURBATION (FEP); ION CHARGING; MUTATION;

FREE ENERGY;

EID: 42749105341     PISSN: 1063651X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.057702     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. A. R. Leach, Molecular Modeling: Principles and Applications (Prentice Hall, New York, 2001).
2. G. Hummer and A. Szabo, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.PNASA60027-842410.1073/pnas.071034098 98, 3658 (2001);
3. T. Hugel and M. Seitz, Macromol. Rapid Commun.MRCOE31022-133610.1002/1521-3927(20010901)22:13<989::AID-MARC989>3.0.CO;2-D 22, 989 (2001);
4. J. Liphardt, S. Dumont, S. B. Smith, I. Tinoco, and C. Bustamante, ScienceSCIEAS0036-807510.1126/science.1071152 296, 1832 (2002);
5. R. Lavery, A. Lebrun, J. F. Allemand, D. Bensimon, and V. Croquette, J. Phys.: Condens. MatterJCOMEL0953-898410.1088/0953-8984/14/14/202 14, R383 (2002).
6. C. Jarzynski, Phys. Rev. Lett.PRLTAO0031-900710.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2690 78, 2690 (1997);
7. C. Jarzynski, Phys. Rev. EPLEEE81063-651X10.1103/PhysRevE.56.5018 56, 5018 (1997).
8. J. Gore, F. Ritort, and C. Bustamante, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.PNASA60027-8424 100, 12?564 (2003).
9. N. D. Lu, D. A. Kofke, and T. B. Woolf, J. Comput. Chem.JCCHDD0192-8651 25, 28 (2004).
10. D. Frenkel and B. Smit, Understanding Molecular Simulation: From Algorithms to Applications, 2nd ed. (Academic, New York, 2002).
11. D. A. Kofke and P. T. Cummings, Mol. Phys.MOPHAM0026-897610.1080/002689797169600 92, 973 (1997).
12. N. D. Lu and D. A. Kofke, J. Chem. Phys.JCPSA60021-960610.1063/1.1359181, 114, 7303 (2001);
13. N. D. Lu and D. A. Kofke, J. Chem. Phys.JCPSA60021-960610.1063/1.1405449 115, 6866 (2001).
14. D. A. Kofke, Mol. Phys.MOPHAM0026-8976 (to be published).
15. N. D. Lu, J. K. Singh, and D. A. Kofke, J. Chem. Phys.JCPSA60021-960610.1063/1.1537241 118, 2977 (2003).
16. G. E. Crooks, J. Stat. Phys.JSTPBS0022-471510.1023/A:1023208217925 90, 1481 (1998);
17. G. E. Crooks, Phys. Rev. EPLEEE81063-651X10.1103/PhysRevE.60.2721 60, 2721 (1999).
18. D. M. Zuckerman and T. B. Woolf, Chem. Phys. Lett.CHPLBC0009-261410.1016/S0009-2614(01)01397-5 351, 445 (2002);
19. D. M. Zuckerman and T. B. Woolf, Phys. Rev. Lett.PRLTAO0031-900710.1103/PhysRevLett.89.180602 89, 180602 (2002);
20. D. M. Zuckerman and T. B. Woolf, J. Stat. Phys.JSTPBS0022-471510.1023/B:JOSS.0000013961.84860.5b 114, 1303 (2004);
21. N. Lu, D. A. Kofke, and J. Adhikari, Phys. Rev. EPLEEE81063-651X10.1103/PhysRevE.68.026122 68, 026122 (2003).
22. J. P. Hansen and I. R. McDonald, Theory of Simple Liquids (Academic Press, New York, 1986).
23. P. G. Wolynes, J. N. Onuchic, and D. Thirumalai, ScienceSCIEAS0036-807510.1063/1.471317 267, 1619 (1995).
24. J. P. Valleau and D. N. Card, J. Chem. Phys.JCPSA60021-960610.1063/1.1678245 57, 5457 (1972);
25. R. J. Radmer and P. A. Kollman, J. Comput. Chem.JCCHDD0192-865110.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(199705)18:7<902::AID-JCC4>3.3.CO;2-2 18, 902 (1997).
26. G. M. Torrie and J. P. Valleau, J. Comput. Phys.JCTPAH0021-9991 23, 187 (1977).
27. C. H. Bennett, J. Comput. Phys.JCTPAH0021-9991 22, 245 (1976).
28. G. E. Crooks, Phys. Rev. EPLEEE81063-651X10.1103/PhysRevE.61.2361 61, 2361 (2000).
29. T. P. Straatsma and H. J. C. Berendsen, J. Chem. Phys.JCPSA60021-960610.1063/1.455539 89, 5876 (1988).
30. A “work cycle” consists of 100 nonuniform steps in (Formula presented) from 0 to 1 and back (100 each way). One simulation sweep ((Formula presented) MC trials) is performed after each step in (Formula presented) and 1000 equilibration sweeps are conducted after reaching each endpoint, before beginning the next work half cycle.