Superconducting order parameter in heavily overdoped Bi2Sr 2CaCu2O8+δ: A global quantitative analysis

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 69, Issue 22, 2004, Pages

  He, R H ^a   Feng, D L ^a   Eisaki, H ^b   Shimoyama, J I ^c   Kishio, K ^c   Gu, G D ^d  

^a FUDAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED INDUSTRIAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AIST   (Japan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^d BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BISMUTH DERIVATIVE; CALCIUM DERIVATIVE; COPPER COMPLEX; OXYGEN DERIVATIVE; STRONTIUM;

ARTICLE; DENSITY; EXCITATION; PARAMETER; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTUM MECHANICS; SPECTROPHOTOMETRY; SPECTRUM; SUPERCONDUCTOR; TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE;

EID: 42749104807     PISSN: 01631829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.220502     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. C. N. Yang, Rev. Mod. Phys. 34, 694 (1962).
2. S. Chakravarty and H.-Y. Kee, Phys. Rev. B 61, 14821 (2000).
3. D. L. Feng et al., Science 289, 277 (2000).
4. D. S. Dessau et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 2160 (1991); D. H. Lu et al., ibid. 86, 4370 (2001); D. L. Feng et al., ibid. 88, 107001 (2002).
5. D. S. Dessau et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 2160 (1991); D. H. Lu et al., ibid. 86, 4370 (2001); D. L. Feng et al., ibid. 88, 107001 (2002).
6. D. S. Dessau et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 2160 (1991); D. H. Lu et al., ibid. 86, 4370 (2001); D. L. Feng et al., ibid. 88, 107001 (2002).
7. H. Ding et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 227001 (2001).
8. Z. M. Yusof et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 167006 (2002).
9. A. A. Kordyuk et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 077003 (2002).
10. S. V. Borisenko et al., Phys. Rev. B 66, 140509 (2002).
11. S. V. Borisenko et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 207001 (2003).
12. D. L. Feng et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5550 (2001).
13. M. R. Norman et al., Phys. Rev. B 53, 615 (1995); A. I. Liechtenstein et al., Phys. Rev. B 54, 12505 (1996).
14. M. R. Norman et al., Phys. Rev. B 53, 615 (1995); A. I. Liechtenstein et al., Phys. Rev. B 54, 12505 (1996).
15. D. L. Feng et al., Phys. Rev. B 65, 220501(R) (2002).
16. M. Lindroos, S. Sahrakorpi, and A. Bansil, Phys. Rev. B 65, 054514 (2002).
17. J. C. Campuzano et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3709 (1999); A. Kaminski et al., ibid. 86, 1070 (2001).
18. J. C. Campuzano et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3709 (1999); A. Kaminski et al., ibid. 86, 1070 (2001).
19. sc(T) takes into account the superconducting gap (SCG) opening and the other parameters vary among experiments on different samples.
20. S. H. Pan et al., Nature (London) 413, 282 (2001).
21. M. Randeria et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4951 (1995).
22. Ch. Niedermayer et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1764 (1993).
23. We define the BBS amplitude in the experimental sense, i.e., the energy separation between the maxima of AB and BB, which do not coincide with the renormalized band energy position ε.
24. Z. A. Xu et al., Nature (London) 406, 486 (2000).
25. J. Corson et al., Nature (London) 398, 221 (1999).
26. M. Eschrig and M. R. Norman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 277005 (2002).
27. Y. J. Uemura, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 14, 3703 (2000).
28. For example, see E. W. Carlson et al., Phys. Rev. B 62, 3422 (2000) for the stripe theory; D.-H. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2694 (2000) for the resonant valence bond theory.
29. For example, see E. W. Carlson et al., Phys. Rev. B 62, 3422 (2000) for the stripe theory; D.-H. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2694 (2000) for the resonant valence bond theory.