Quantum Monte Carlo study of the pairing symmetry competition in the Hubbard model

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 69, Issue 21, 2004, Pages

  Kuroki, Kazuhiko ^a   Tanaka, Yukio ^b   Kimura, Takashi ^c,d   Arita, Ryotaro ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ELECTRO COMMUNICATIONS   (Japan)

^b NAGOYA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^d KANAGAWA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

OXYGEN DERIVATIVE; RUTHENIUM DERIVATIVE; STRONTIUM;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MONTE CARLO METHOD; QUANTUM MECHANICS; QUANTUM THEORY; SUPERCONDUCTOR;

EID: 42749101500     PISSN: 01631829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.214511     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Y. Maeno et al., H. Hashimoto, K. Yoshida, S. Nishizaki, T. Fujita, J. G. Bednorz, and F. Lichtenberg, Nature (London) 372, 532 (1994).
2. G. M. Luke et al., Nature (London) 394, 558 (1998).
3. K. Ishida et al., H. Mukada, Y. Kitaoka, K. Asayama, Z. Q. Mao, Y. Mori and Y. Maeno, Nature (London) 396, 658 (1998).
4. J. A. Duffy et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 5387 (2000).
5. I. J. Lee et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3555 (1997).
6. I. J. Lee et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 017004 (2002).
7. T. M. Rice and M. Sigrist, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 7, L643 (1995).
8. Y. Sidis et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3320 (1999).
9. V. J. Emery, Synth. Met. 13, 21 (1986).
10. Y. Hasegawa and H. Fukuyama, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 55, 3978 (1986).
11. A. G. Lebed, K. Machida, and M. Ozaki, Phys. Rev. B 62, R795 (2000).
12. H. Shimahara, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 58, 1735 (1989).
13. H. Kino and H. Kontani, J. Low Temp. Phys. 117, 317 (1999).
14. K. Kuroki and H. Aoki, Phys. Rev. B 60, 3060 (1999).
15. T. Nomura and K. Yamada, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 70, 2694 (2001).
16. K. Kuroki, R. Arita, and H. Aoki, Phys. Rev. B 63, 094509 (2001).
17. Y. Fuseya, Y. Onishi, H. Kohno, and K. Miyake, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 14, L655 (2002).
18. J. P. Pouget and S. Ravy, J. Phys. I 6, 1501 (1996).
19. S. Kagoshima, Y. Saso, M. Maesato, R. Kondo, and T. Hasegawa, Solid State Commun. 110, 479 (1999).
20. Y. Fuseya, H. Kohno, and K. Miyake, Physica B 329-333 1455 (2003).
21. T. Kuwabara and M. Ogata, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4586 (2000).
22. M. Sato and M. Kohmoto, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 69, 3505 (2000).
23. K. Kuroki, M. Ogata, R. Arita, and H. Aoki, Phys. Rev. B 63, 060506 (2002).
24. T. Takimoto, Phys. Rev. B 62, R14641 (2000).
25. I. Eremin, D. Manske, C. Joas, and K. H. Bennemann, Europhys. Lett. 58, 871 (2002).
26. H. Mukuda et al., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 67, 3945 (1998).
27. T. Nomura and K. Yamada, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 69, 3678 (2002); T. Nomura and K. Yamada, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 69, 404 (2002).
28. T. Nomura and K. Yamada, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 69, 3678 (2002); T. Nomura and K. Yamada, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 69, 404 (2002).
29. Y. Yanase and M. Ogata, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 72, 673 (2003).
30. C. Honerkamp and M. Salmhofer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 187004 (2001); C. Honerkamp and M. Salmhofer, Phys. Rev. B 64, 184516 (2001).
31. C. Honerkamp and M. Salmhofer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 187004 (2001); C. Honerkamp and M. Salmhofer, Phys. Rev. B 64, 184516 (2001).
32. N. E. Bickers, D. J. Scalapino, and S. R. White, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 961 (1989); G. Esirgen and N. E. Bickers, Phys. Rev. B 55, 2122 (1997).
33. N. E. Bickers, D. J. Scalapino, and S. R. White, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 961 (1989); G. Esirgen and N. E. Bickers, Phys. Rev. B 55, 2122 (1997).
34. R. Arita, K. Kuroki, and H. Aoki, Phys. Rev. B 60, 14585 (1999); R. Arita, K. Kuroki, and H. Aoki, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 69, 1181 (2000).
35. R. Arita, K. Kuroki, and H. Aoki, Phys. Rev. B 60, 14585 (1999); R. Arita, K. Kuroki, and H. Aoki, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 69, 1181 (2000).
36. P. Monthoux and G. Lonzarich, Phys. Rev. B 59, 14598 (1999).
37. I. I. Mazin and D. J. Singh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 733 (1997).
38. A. Liebsch and A. Lichtenstein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1591 (2000).
39. K. K. Ng and M. Sigrist, Europhys. Lett. 49, 473 (2000).
40. M. Suzuki, Prog. Theor. Phys. 56, 1454 (1976).
41. G. Sugiyama and S. E. Koonin, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 168, 1 (1986).
42. S. Sorella et al., Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 1, 993 (1988).
43. S. R. White et al., Phys. Rev. B 40, 506 (1989).
44. M. Imada and Y. Hatsugai, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 58, 3752 (1989).
45. K. Kuroki, T. Kimura, and H. Aoki, Phys. Rev. B 54, R15641 (1996).
46. T. Kimura, K. Kuroki, and H. Aoki, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 66, 1599 (1997).
47. K. Kuroki and H. Aoki, Phys. Rev. B 56, R14287 (1997).
48. Due to the finite size effects mentioned here, we cannot carry out a reliable finite size scaling analysis because the parameter values for which the open shell condition is satisfied differs according to the system size. Nevertheless, as mentioned in the Introduction, our study has been motivated by the controversy between existing theories concerning the most favorable pairing symmetry, so that the purpose here is not to establish the presence of off-diagonal long range order in the thermodynamic limit, but only to determine which one the pairing symmetries is most favored (if superconductivity actually occurs), and the present analysis suffices for this purpose.
49. F SDW configuration, where the spin density correlation 〈ni↑ni+2↓〉 is large. It is the long range part of the pairing correlation that provides the true measure for the pairing interaction, so we focus only on this part.
50. J. E. Hirsch and D. J. Scalapino, Phys. Rev. B 27, 7169 (1983).
51. J. Solyom, Adv. Phys. 28, 201 (1979).
52. V. J. Emery, in Highly Conducting One-Dimensional Solids, edited by J. T. Devreese et al. (Plenum, New York. 1979), p. 247.
53. c in the triplet channel is not obtained in the FLEX calculation, the eigenvalue of the Eliashberg equation is larger in the triplet channel than in the singlet channel.
54. A. V. Chubukov and J. P. Lu, Phys. Rev. B 46, 11163 (1992).
55. H. Fukazawa and K. Yamada, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 71, 1541 (2002).
56. R. Hlubina, Phys. Rev. B 59, 9600 (1999).