Conversational agents and their longitudinal affordances on communication and interaction

Journal of Interactive Learning Research

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 251-270

  Doering, Aaron ^a   Veletsianos, George ^a   Yerasimou, Theano ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 42749087379     PISSN: 1093023X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Alvarez-Torres, M., Mishra, P., & Zhao, Y. (2001). Judging a book by its cover. Cultural Stereotyping of interactive media and its effect on the recall of text information. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 10(2), 161-183.
2. Baylor, A. L. (2002). Expanding pre-service teachers' metacognitive awareness of instructional planning through pedagogical agents. Educational Technology Research & Development, 50(2), 5-22.
3. Baylor, A. L., & Ryu, J. (2003). Does the presence of image and animation enhance pedagogical agent persona? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 28(4), 373-395.
4. Clark, R. E., & Choi, S. (2005). Five design principles for experiments on the effects of animated pedagogical agents. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(3), 209-225.
5. Cole, R., Vuuren, S. V., Pellom, B., Hacioglu, K., Ma, J., Movellan, J., et al. (2003). Perceptive animated interfaces: First steps toward a new paradigm for human-computer interaction. Proceedings of the IEEE, 91(9), 1391-1405.
6. Craig S., Gholson B., & Driscoll D. (2002). Animated pedagogical agents in multimedia educational environments: Effects of agent properties, picture features, and redundancy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 428-434.
7. Dehn D., & van Mulken S. (2000). The impact of animated interface agents: a review of empirical research. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 52(1), 1-22.
8. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
9. Gulz, A. (2004). Benefits of virtual characters in computer based learning environments: Claims and evidence. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 14, 313-334.
10. Jonassen, D. (1995). Computers as cognitive tools: Learning with technology, not from technology. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 6(2), 40-73.
11. Jonassen, D. (2000). Computers as mindtools for schools: Engaging critical thinking. Columbus, OH: Prentice Hall.
12. Lester, J., Converse, S., Kahler, S., Barlow, T., Stone, B., & Bhogal, R. (1997). The persona effect: Affective impact of animated pedagogical agents. Proceedings of Human Computer Interaction (CHI), Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), (pp. 359-366). New York: ACM.
13. Louwerse, A., Graesser, A., Lu, S., & Mitchell, H. (2005). Social cues in animated conversational agents. Applied Cognitive Psychology 19, 693-704.
14. Mahmood, A., & Ferneley, E. (2006). Embodied agents in e-learning environments: An exploratory case study. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 17(2), 143-162.
15. Mayer, R. E., Dow, G. T., & Mayer, S. (2003). Multimedia learning in an interactive self-explaining environment: What works in the design of agent-based microworlds? Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 806-813.
16. Moreno, R., & Mayer, RE., (2002). Verbal redundancy in multimedia learning: When reading helps listening. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 156-163.
17. Moreno, R., Mayer, R. E., Spires, H. A., & Lester, J. (2001). The case for social agency in computer-based teaching: Do students learn more deeply when they interact with animated pedagogical agents? Cognition and Instruction, 19(2), 117-213.
18. Nass, C., Moon, Y., & Carney, P. (1999). Are respondents polite to computers? Social desirability and direct responses to computers. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 29(5), 1093-1110.
19. Nass, C., Moon, Y., & Green, N. (1997). Are computers gender-neutral? Gender stereotypic responses to computers. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 27(10), 864-876.
20. Norman, D. A. (1997). How might people interact with agents. In J. M. Bradshaw (Ed.), Software agents (pp. 49-56). Menlo Park, CA: MIT Press. Reeves, B., & Nass, C. I. (1996). The media equation. How people treat computers, television, and new media as real people and places. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press/CSLI.
21. Ryu, J., & Baylor, A. L. (2005). The psychometric structure of pedagogical agent persona. Technology, Instruction, Cognition & Learning, 2(4), 291-319.
22. Wang, N., Johnson, W. L., Rizzo, P., Shaw, E., & Mayer, R. (2005). Experimental evaluation of polite interaction tactics for pedagogical agents. Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, (pp. 12-19). New York: ACM.
23. Yin, R. (1994). Case study research design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.