Altered mating behaviour in a Cry1Ac-resistant strain of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

Journal of Applied Entomology

Volumn 132, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 360-365

  Zhao, X C ^a   Wu, K M ^a   Liang, G M ^a   Guo, Y Y ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF PLANT PROTECTION   (China)

Author keywords

Bacillus thuringiensis; Fitness cost; Helicoverpa armigera; Random mating; Resistant

Indexed keywords

BACTERIUM; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COTTON; GENE EXPRESSION; MATING BEHAVIOR; MOTH; PATERNITY; PEST RESISTANCE; TRANSGENIC PLANT;

BACILLUS THURINGIENSIS; GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM; HELICOVERPA ARMIGERA; LEPIDOPTERA; NOCTUIDAE;

EID: 42649127382     PISSN: 09312048     EISSN: 14390418     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0418.2008.01268.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Akhurst RJ, James W, Bird LJ, Beard C, 2003. Resistance to the Cry1Ac δ-endotoxin of Bacillus thuringiensis in the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 96, 1290 1299.
2. Bates SL, Zhao J-Z, Roush RT, Shelton M, 2005. Insect resistance management in GM crops: past, present and future. Nature Biotech. 23, 57 62.
3. Coyne JA, Elwyn S, Rolán-Alvarez E, 2005. Impact of experimental design on Drosophila sexual isolation studies: direct effects and comparison to field hybridization data. Evolution 59, 2588 2601.
4. Fischer K, 2006. Reduced mating vigor in selection lines of the butterfly Bicyclus anynana. J. Insect Behav. 19, 657 668.
5. Fitt GP, 1989. The ecology of Heliothis spp. in relation to agroecosystems. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 34, 17 52.
6. Groeters FR, Tabashnik BE, Finson N, Johnson MW, 1993. Resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis affects mating success of the diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 86, 1035 1039.
7. Higginson DM, Morin S, Nyboer ME, Biggs RW, Tabashnik BE, Carrière Y, 2005. Evolutionary trade-offs of insect resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis crops, fitness cost affecting paternity. Evolution 59, 915 920.
8. Hood GM, 2004. Poptools version 2.6.2. URL http://www.cse.csiro.au/ poptools.
9. Joron M, Brakefield PM, 2003. Captivity masks inbreeding effects on male mating success in butterflies. Nature 424, 191 194.
10. Kranthi KR, Dhawad CS, Naidu SR, Mate K, Behere GT, Wadaskar RM, Kranthi S, 2006. Inheritance of resistance in Indian Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) to Cry1Ac toxin of Bacillus thuringiensis. Crop Protection 25, 119 124.
11. Li G, Wu K, Gould F, Feng H, He Y, Guo Y, 2004. Frequency of Bt resistance genes in Helicoverpa armigera populations from the Yellow River cotton-farming region of China. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 112, 135 143.
12. Liang G, Tan W, Guo Y, 2000. Study on screening and inheritance mode of resistance to Bt transgenic cotton in H. armigera. Acta Entomol. Sin. 43, 57 62.
13. Liao C, Heckel DG, Akhurst R, 2002. Toxicity of Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal proteins for Helicoverpa armigera and Helicoverpa punctiger (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), major pest of cotton. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 80, 55 63.
14. Liu YB, Tabashnik BE, Dennehy TJ, Patin AL, Bartlett AC, 1999. Development time and resistance to Bt crops. Nature 400, 519.
15. Merrell DJ, 1949. Selective mating in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 34, 370 389.
16. SAS Institute, 1988. SAS/STAT user's guide, release 6.03. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
17. Tabashnik BE, Carrière Y, Dennehy TJ, Morin S, Sisterson MS, Roush RT, Shelton AM, Zhao J-Z, 2003. Insect resistance to transgenic Bt crops: lessons from the laboratory and field. J. Econ. Entomol. 96, 1031 1038.
18. Wu KM, Guo YY, 2005. The evolution of cotton pest management practices in China. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 50, 31 52.
19. Wu C-I, Hollocher H, Begun DJ, Aquadro CF, Xu Y, Wu M-L, 1995. Sexual isolation in Drosophila melanogaster: a possible case of incipient speciation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 2519 2523.