Disaggregation of seismic hazard extended to disaggregation of annualized loss ratio

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America

Volumn 97, Issue 1 B, 2007, Pages 305-317

  Cao, Tianqing ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DESIGN EARTHQUAKES; DISAGGREGATION; GROUND MOTIONS; GROUND-MOTION; HAZARD CURVES; HAZARD DISAGGREGATION; INSURANCE INDUSTRY; LOSS RATIO; RECURRENCE TIME; RELATIVE CONTRIBUTION; RESIDENTIAL HOMES; RESPONSE CURVES; RETURN PERIODS; SEISMIC HAZARDS; SEISMIC SOURCE; SPECTRAL FREQUENCY; STRUCTURAL VULNERABILITY;

RISK ASSESSMENT; SEISMOLOGY;

HAZARDS;

EID: 42649112918     PISSN: 00371106     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1785/0120060093     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Bazzurro, P., and C. A. Cornell (1999). Disaggregation of seismic hazard, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 89,501-520.
2. Cao, T., and M. D. Petersen (2006). Uncertainty of earthquake losses due to model uncertainty of input ground motions in the Los Angeles area, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 96,365-376.
3. Cao, T., M. D. Petersen, C. H. Cramer, T. R. Toppozada, M. S. Reichle, and J. F. Davis (1999). The calculation of expected loss using probabilistic seismic hazard, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 89,867-876.
4. Cao, T., M. D. Petersen, and A. D. Frankel (2005). Model uncertainties of the 2002 update of California seismic hazard maps, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 95,2040-2057.
5. Cramer, C. H., and M. D. Petersen (1996). Predominant seismic source distance and magnitude maps for Los Angeles, Orange, and Ventura counties, California, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 86,1645-1649.
6. Frankel, A. D., M. D. Petersen, C. S. Mueller, K. M. Haller, R. L. Wheeler, E. V. Leyendecker, R. L. Wesson, S. C. Harmsen, C. H. Cramer, D. M. Perkins, and K. S. Rukstales (2002). Documentation for the 2002 Update of the National Seismic Hazard Maps, U.S. Geol. Surv. Open-File Rept. 02-420.
7. Harmsen, S., D. Perkins, and A Frankel (1999). Deaggregation of probabilistic ground motions in the central and eastern United States, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 89,1-13.
8. Karaca, E. (2005). Regional earthquake loss estimation: role of transportation network, sensitivity and uncertainty, and risk mitigation, Ph.D. Thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
9. McGuire, R. K. (1995). Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis and design earthquakes: closing the loop, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 85,1275-1284.
10. National Institute of Building Sciences (NIBS) (1997). Earthquake loss estimation methodology, HAZUS97 (SR1): Technical Manual, Report prepared for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, NIBS, Washington, D.C.
11. National Institute of Building Sciences (NIBS) (2002). Earthquake loss estimation methodology, HAZUS02 (SR2): Technical Manual, Report prepared for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, NIBS, Washington, D.C.
12. Petersen, M. D., W. A. Bryant, W. H. Cramer, T. Cao, M. S. Reichle, A. D. Frankel, J. J. Lienkaemper, P. A. McCrory, and D. P. Schwartz (1996). Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for the state of California, California Department of Conservation Division of Mines and Geology Open-File Rept. 96-08, U.S. Geol. Surv. Open-File Rept. 96-706.
13. Romero-Hudock, S., and G. J. Rix (2005). Liquefaction potential mapping in Memphis/Shelby County, Tennessee, Presented at Seminar on New Knowledge of Earthquake Hazard in the Central United States and Implications for Building Seismic Design Practice, 3 March 2005, Memphis, Tennessee (speaker handouts), Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California, 7-15-7-32.