Sustainable development in four Swedish communities priorities, responsibility, empowerment

Environment, Development and Sustainability

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 311-336

  Lindström, Marianne ^a   Küller, Rikard ^b  

^a LINNAEUS UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b LUND INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Agenda 21; Attitudes; Empowerment; Priorities; Responsibility; Sustainable development

Indexed keywords

AGENDA 21; DECISION MAKING; EMPOWERMENT; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

EURASIA; EUROPE; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA; SWEDEN;

EID: 42549146932     PISSN: 1387585X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10668-006-9066-z     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Adolfsson Jörby, S. (2001). Sustainable development in Swedish municipalities. To know, to be able, to want and to do. Doctoral dissertation. Department of Biology and Environmental Science. University of Kalmar, Kalmar.
2. Adolfsson Jörby, S. (2002). Local Agenda 21 in four Swedish municipalities - A tool towards sustainability? Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2, 219-244.
3. Adolfsson Jörby, S., & Lindström, M. (2000). Local Agenda 21. 'A comparison between attitudes and practice in two Swedish municipalities. Local Governance, 2, 101-116.
4. Adolfsson Jörby, S., Lindström, M., Cortés Sack, S., & Gulda, H. (2001). Evaluation of the TASS Project 1999-2001. Department of Biology and Environmental Science. University of Kalmar, Kalmar.
5. Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, personality and behaviour. Chicago: The Dorsey Press.
6. Angelöw, B., & Jonsson, T. (1994). Individ och Miljö (The Individual and the Environment). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
7. Bennulf, M., Lundin, U., & Petersson, S. (1996). Göteborgarna och miljön (The people of Gothenburg and the environment). Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg: CEFOS.
8. Bennulf, M. (1999). Miljöengagemanget i graven? (Environmental concern in the grave?)". In L. J. Lundgren (Ed.), Livsstil och Miljö. Värderingar, Val, Vanor (Life Style and Environment. Values. Choises. Habits). Stockholm: Naturvårdsverkets Förlag.
9. Bierhoff H. W., & Auhagen A. E. (2001). Responsibility a fundamental human phenomenon. In A. E Auhagen, & H. W. Bierhoff (Eds.), Responsibility. The many faces of a social phenomenon. London: Routledge.
10. Birnbacher, D. (2001). Philosophical foundations of responsibility. In A. E Auhagen, & H. W. Bierhoff (Eds.), Responsibility. The many faces of a social phenomenon. London: Routledge.
11. Bro, A., Edlund, A., Jakobsson, E., & Persson, G. (1998). Grön demokrati. Om implementeringen av Agenda 21 i åtta svenska kommuner (Green democracy. The implementation of Agenda 21 in eight Swedish municipalities). Novemus, örebro, University of örebro.
12. Burgess, J., Harrison, C. M., & Filius, P. (1998). Environmental communication and the cultural politics of environmental citizenship. Environment and Planning A, 30, 1445-1460.
13. Campbell, C. R., & Martinko, M. J. (1998). An integrative attributional perspective of empowerment and learned helplessness: A multimethod field study. Journal of Management, 24, 173-200.
14. Dunlap R., Gallup, G. H., & Gallup, A. M. (1993). 'Of global concern': results of the health of the planet survey. Environment, 35, 7-15, 33-40.
15. Dunlap, R. (1998). Lay perceptions of global risk: Public views of global warming in cross-national context. International Sociology, 13(4), 473-498.
16. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Orlando: Harcourt Brace & Company.
17. Eckerberg, K., Forsberg, B., & Wickenberg, P. (1998). Sweden: Setting the pace with pioneer municipalities and schools. In W. M. Lafferty, & K. Eckerberg (Eds.), From the earth summit to local Agenda 21. Working towards sustainable development. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd.
18. Freeman, C., Littlewood, S., & Whitney, D. (1996). Local government and the emerging models of participation in the Local Agenda 21 process. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 1, 65-78.
19. Garber, J., & Seligman, M. E. P. (Eds.). (1981). Human helplessness: Theory and applications. New York: Academic Press.
20. Gardner, G. T., & Stern, P. C. (2002). Environmental problems and human behavior. Needham Heights: Allyn and Bacon.
21. Geller, S. (1995). Actively caring for environment. An integration of behaviorism and humanism. Environment and Behaviour, 27, 184-195.
22. Geller, E. S., Winnett, R. A., & Everett, P. B. (1982). Preserving the environment. New strategies for behaviour cange. New York: Pergamon.
23. Gidley, J. M. (1998). Prospective youth visions through imaginative education. Futures, 30, 395-408.
24. Harland, P., & Staats H. J. (1997). Long term effects of the EcoTeam Program in the Netherlands: The situation two years after participation. Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Centre for Energy and Environmental Research. Leiden University, Leiden.
25. Johansson, M., & Lindström, M. (2004). Hur viktigt är det med ren luft? (How important is clean air?). In A. Young-Kronsell, M. Steneroth-Sillén, & P. Wickenberg (Eds.), Miljö och hållbar utveckling. Samhällsvetenskapliga perspektiv från lundahorisont. (Environment and sustainable development. Social science perspectives from the horizon of Lund). Lund: Studentlitteratur.
26. Jonas, H. (1984). The imperative of responsibility. In search of an ethics for the technological age. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
27. Kaiser, F. G., & Shimoda, T. A. (1999). Responsibility as a predictor of ecological behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 243-253.
28. Kaiser, F., Ranney M., Hartig T., & Bowler, P. (1999). Ecological behavior, environmental attitude, and feelings of responsibility for the environment. European Psychologist, 2, 59-74.
29. Kerlinger, F. N. (1964). Foundations of behavioral research. Educational and psychological inquiry. New York, Holt: Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
30. Kvassman, S. (1999). Samtal med den Värdefulla Naturen (Communication with the Valuable Nature). Doctoral thesis, Uppsala University, Uppsala.
31. Küller, R. (1991). Environmental assessment from a neuro-psychological perspective. In T. Gärling, & G. W. Evans (Eds.), Environment, cognition and action: An integrated approach (pp. 111-147). New York: Oxford University Press.
32. Lindén, A. L., & Rinkevicius, L. (1999). Social processes and the environment. Lithuania and Sweden, Research report 2, Sociological Institution. University of Lund, Lund.
33. Lindström, M. (2003). Attitudes towards sustainable development. Priorities, responsibility, empowerment. Doctoral thesis, Environmental Psychology Unit, Lund Institute of Technology, Lund University.
34. Lindström, M., & Adolfsson Jörby, S. (2000). Agenda 21 i kommunerna - Vägen till ett uthålligt samhälle? (Agenda 21 in the Municipalities - A Tool for sustainability?), Research Report IPS 2, Department of Natural Resources Management and Agenda 21 Research. University of Kalmar, Kalmar.
35. Lindström, M., & Johnsson, P. (2003). Environmental concern, self concept and defence style. Environmental Education Research, 1, 51-66.
36. Lindström, M., & Pettersson, L. (2000). Empowerment through EcoTeams. In B. L. B. Wiman, & L. Pettersson (Eds.), NRM&A21 Arrhenius seminar. Faculty of Natural Sciances, School of Natural Resources Management and Agenda 21 Research. Kalmar: University of Kalmar.
37. Mehlmann, M. (1996). EkoTeam. Ta makten over miljöutvecklingen (EcoTeam. Take the power over the development of the environment). GAP Sverige, Stockholm: Global Action Plan for the Earth.
38. Millennium Declaration. (2000). United Nations Millennium Declaration. New York, The General Assembly: UN Department of Public Information.
39. Ministry of Environment. (1997). Agenda 21 in Sweden, National report. From environmental protection to sustainable development, Stockholm: National Committee for Agenda 21.
40. Ministry of Environment. (1999). Sustainable Sweden - Steps towards sustainable development. Fact Sheet, Stockholm: Ministry of Environment.
41. Montada, L. (2001). Denial of responsibility. In A. E. Auhagen, & H. W. Bierhoff (Eds.), Responsibility. The many faces of a social phenomenon. London: Routledge.
42. Moser, P. (2001). Glorification, disillusionment or the way into the future? The significance of Local Agenda 21 processes for the needs of local sustainability. Local Environment, 4, 453-467.
43. Nilsson, M., & Küller, R. (2000). Travel behaviour and environmental concern. Transportation Research Part D, 5, 211-234.
44. Schwartz, S. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. New York: Academic Press.
45. Southey S. (2001). Accelerating sustainability: From agenda to action. Local Environment, 4, 483-489.
46. Staats, H. J., & Harland, P. (1995). The Ecoteam Program in the Netherlands, E & M Centre for Energy and Environmental Research. Leiden University, Leiden.
47. Stern, P. C., & Dietz, T. (1994). The value basis of environmental concern. Journal of Social Issues, 50, 65-84.
48. Thomas, K. W., & Velthouse B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An "interpretive" model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15, 666-681.
49. UNCED, (1992). Agenda 21, the United Nations Programme of Actions from Rio. New York: UN Department of Public Information.
50. UNEP (United Nation Environmental Programme), Global Environmental Outlook. (2000). www.unep/Geo2000/ov-e/0011.htm. (2000-12-05).
51. Uzzell, D. (2000). The psycho-spatial dimensions of global environmental problems. Journal of Environmental psychology, 20, 307-318.
52. Walsh-Daneshmandi, A., & MacLachlan, M. (2000). Environmental risk to the self: Factor analysis and development of subscales for the environmental appraisal inventory (EIA with an Irish sample). Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20, 141-149.
53. Waters, E., Noyes, D. M., Vaughn, B. E., & Ricks, M. (1985). Q-sort definition of social competence and self-esteem: Discriminant validity of related construct in theory and data. Developmental Psychology, 21, 508-552.
54. WCED. (1987). Our common future. World commission on environment and development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
55. WSSD. (2002). World summit on sustainable development. Johannesburg Summit 2002. Key outcomes of the summit. New York: UN Department of Public Information.