Responsibility as a predictor of ecological behaviour

Journal of Environmental Psychology

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 243-253

  Kaiser, Florian G ^a   Shimoda, Todd A ^b  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000530545     PISSN: 02724944     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jevp.1998.9123     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Amelang M., Bartussek D. Untersuchungen zur Validität einer neuen Lügen-Skala [Validity studies of a new Lying Scale]. Diagnostica. 16:1970;103-122.
2. Arbuthnot J. The roles of attitudinal and personality variables in the prediction of environmental behavior and knowledge. Environment and Behavior. 9:1977;217-232.
3. Axelrod L. J., Lehman D. R. Responding to environmental concern: what factors guide individual action? Journal of Environmental Psychology. 13:1993;149-159.
4. Biel A., Gärling T. The role of uncertainty in resource dilemmas. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 15:1995;221-233.
5. Bischof N. On the phylogeny of human morality. Stent G. S. Morality as a Biological Phenomenon. 1980;48-66 University of California Press, Berkeley.
6. Bischof-Köhler D. Zur Phylogenese menschlicher Motivation [The phylogenesis of human motivation]. Eckensberger L. H., Lantermann E.-D. Emotion and Reflexivität. 1985;3-47 Urban & Schwarzenberg, München.
7. Blöbaum, A. Hunecke, M. Matthies, E. Höger, R. 1997, Ökologische Verantwortung und private Energie- & PKW-Nutzung [Ecological responsibility and private energy consumption & automobile use], 49, Bochum, Germany, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Kognitions- und Umweltpsychologie.
8. Dunlap R. E., Van Liere K. D. The new environmental paradigm: a proposed instrument and preliminary results. Journal of Environmental Education. 9:1978;10-19.
9. Fridgen C. Human disposition toward hazards: testing the environmental appraisal inventory. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 14:1994;101-111.
10. Fuhrer U. Sozialpsychologisch fundierter Theorierahman für eine Umweltbewusstseinsforschung [Social psychological framework for research on environmental concern]. Psychologische Rundschau. 46:1995;93-103.
11. Fuhrer U., Wölfing S. Von den sozialen Grundlagen des Umweltbewusstseins zum verantwortlichen Umwelthandeln: Die sozialpsychologische Dimension der Umweltproblematik [From the social basis of environmental concern to responsible ecological action: the social-psychological dimension of environmental problems]. 1997;Huber, Bern.
12. Geller E. S. Evaluating energy conservation programs: is verbal report enough? Journal of Consumer Research. 8:1981;331-335.
13. Granzin K. L., Olsen J. E. Characterizing participants in activities protecting the environment: a focus on donating, recycling, and conservation behaviors. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing. 10:1991;1-27.
14. Guagnano G. A., Stern P. C., Dietz T. Influences on attitude-behavior relationships: a natural experiment with curbside recycling. Environment and Behavior. 27:1995;699-718.
15. Hallin P. D. Environmental concern and environmental behavior in Foley, a small town in Minnesota. Environment and Behavior. 27:1995;558-578.
16. Hines J. M., Hungerford H. R., Tomera A. N. Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: a meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Education. 18:1986/87;1-8.
17. Hopper J. R., Nielsen J. M. Recycling as altruistic behavior: normative and behavioral strategies to expand participation in a community program. Environment and Behavior. 23:1991;195-220.
18. Howe D. C., Kahn P. H. Jr., Friedman B. Along the Rio Negro: Brazilian children's environmental views and values. Developmental Psychology. 32:1996;979-987.
19. Jöreskog K., Sörbom D. LISREL8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language. 1993;Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
20. Kahn P. H. Jr. Developmental psychology and the biophilia hypothesis: children's affiliation with nature. Developmental Review. 17:1997;1-61.
21. Kahn P. H. Jr., Friedman B. Environmental views and values of children in an inner-city black community. Child Development. 66:1995;1403-1417.
22. Kaiser F. G. Zur Sozialpsychologie des Verant wortlichkeitserlebens: Drei Konzepte mit gesellschaftlichen Folgen [The social psychology of responsibility feelings: three concepts and some consequences for societies]. Zeitschrift für Politische Psychologie. 4:1996;43-52.
23. Kaiser F. G. A general measure of ecological behaviour. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 28:1998;395-422.
24. Kaiser F. G., Wölfing S., Fuhrer U. Environmental attitude and ecological behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 19:1999;1-19.
25. Kals E. Ökologisch relevante Verbotsforderungen, Engagement- und Verzichtsbereitschaften am Beispiel der Luftqualität [Ecologically relevant acceptances of governmental prohibitions and readiness to adopt behaviours related to pollution]. 1993;Universität Trier, Trier.
26. Kals E. Verantwortliches Umweltverhalten: Umweltschützende Entscheidungen erklären und fördern [Responsible ecological behaviour: predicting and promoting conservation decisions]. 1996;Beltz, PVU, Weinheim.
27. Kals, E. Becker, R. P. 1994, Zusammenschau von drei umweltpsychologischen Untersuchungen zur Erklärung verkehrsbezogener Verbotsforderungen, Engagementsbereitschaften und Handlungsentscheidungen [Three environmental psychological studies predicting transportation related prohibitions, readiness, and decisions to act], 73, Trier, Germany, Universität Trier, Fachbereich 1 - Psychologie.
28. Kals E., Montada L. Umweltschutz und die Verantwortung der Bürger [Pollution control and the responsibility of citizens]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie. 25:1994;326-337.
29. Kantola S. J., Syme G. J., Nesdale A. R. The effects of appraised severity and efficacy in promoting water conservation: an informational analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 13:1983;164-182.
30. Kelman H. C., Hamilton V. L. Crimes of Obedience - Toward a Social Psychology of Authority and Responsibility. 1989;Yale University Press, New Haven.
31. Keltner D., Buswell B. N. Evidence for the distinctness of embarrassment, shame, and guilt: a study of recalled antecedents and facial expressions of emotion. Cognition and Emotion. 10:1996;155-171.
32. Kruse L. Globale Umweltveränderungen: Eine Herausfordrung für die Psychologie [Global environmental changes: a challenge for psychology]. Psychologische Rundschau. 46:1995;81-92.
33. Leonard-Barton D. Voluntary simplicity lifestyles and energy conservation. Journal of Consumer Research. 8:1981;243-252.
34. MacCallum R. C., Roznowski M., Necowitz L. B. Model modification in covariance structure analysis: the problem of capitalization on chance. Psychological Bulletin. 111:1992;490-504.
35. Maloney M. P., Ward M. P. Ecology: let's hear from the people. An objective scale for the measurement of ecological attitudes and knowledge. American Psychologist. 28:1973;583-586.
36. Milgram S. Obedience to Authority. 1975;Harper & Row, New York.
37. Montada L. Moralische Urteile und die Entwicklung des Konzepts Verantwortlichkeit [Moral judgements and the development of the responsibility concept]. Oerter R., Montada L. Entwicklungspsychologie. Ein Lehrbuch. 1987;759-766 PVU, München.
38. Montada L. Understanding oughts by assessing moral reasoning or moral emotions? Noam G., Wren T. The Moral Self. 1992;292-309 MIT Press, Boston.
39. Montada, L. Kals, E. 1994, Perceived justice of ecological policy and proenvironmental commitments, 72, Trier, Germany, Universität Trier, Fachbereich 1 - Psychologie.
40. Mosler J. Self-dissemination of environmentally responsible behavior: the influence of trust in a commons dilemma game. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 13:1993;111-123.
41. Reichle B. Die Zuschreibung von Verantwortlichkeit für negative Ereignisse in Partnerschaften: Ein Modell und erste empirische Befunde [Ascription of responsibility for negative events in close relationships: a model and first empirical results]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie. 25:1994;227-237.
42. Schahn J., Holzer E. Konstruktion, Validierung und Anwendung von Skalen zur Erfassung des individuellen Umweltbewusstseins [Development, validation, and application of an Environmental Concern Scale]. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie. 11:1990;185-204.
43. Schwartz S. H. Normative influences on altruism. Berkowitz L. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. 10:1977;221-271 Academic Press, New York.
44. Schwartz S. H., Howard J. A. A normative decision-making model of altruism. Rushton J. P., Sorrentino R. M. Altruism and Helping Behavior. 1981;189-211 Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
45. Scott D., Willits F. K. Environmental attitudes and behavior: a Pennsylvania survey. Environment and Behavior. 26:1994;239-260.
46. Shaver K. G. The Attribution of Blame. Causality, Responsibility, and Blameworthiness. 1985;Springer, New York.
47. Shean G. D., Shei T. The values of student environmentalists. Journal of Psychology. 129:1995;559-564.
48. Stern P. C. Psychological dimensions of global environmental change. Annual Reviews of Psychology. 43:1992;269-302.
49. Stern P. C., Dietz T., Kalof L. Value orientations, gender, and environmental concern. Environment and Behavior. 25:1993;322-348.
50. Tabachnick B. G., Fidell L. S. Using Multivariate Statistics. 1989;Harper, New York.
51. Taylor S., Todd P. An integrated model of waste management behavior: a test of household recycling and composting intentions. Environment and Behavior. 27:1995;603-630.
52. Thøgersen J. Recycling and morality: a critical review of the literature. Environment and Behavior. 28:1998;536-558.
53. Tugendhat E. Vorlesungen über Ethik [Lectures on ethics]. 1994;Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a.M.
54. Turiel E. The Development of Social Knowledge, Morality and Convention. 1985;University Press, Cambridge.
55. Van Liere K. D., Dunlap R. E. Moral norms and environmental behavior: an application of Schwartz's norm-activation model to yard burning. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 8:1978;174-188.
56. Vining J., Ebreo A. Predicting recycling behavior from global and specific environmental attitudes and changes in recycling opportunities. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 22:1992;1580-1607.
57. Wilson J. Q. Das moralische Empfinden: Warum die Natur des Menschen besser ist als ihr Ruf [The moral sense]. 1994;Kabel, Hamburg.