Cognitive processes in children's multimedia text learning

Applied Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 375-387

  Segers, Eliane ^a   Verhoeven, Ludo ^a   Hulstijn Hendrikse, Nanneke ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD PSYCHOLOGY; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; KNOWLEDGE; LEARNING; LEARNING ENVIRONMENT; LONG TERM MEMORY; MALE; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; MULTIMEDIA; OPEN ENDED QUESTIONNAIRE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SCHOOL CHILD; SPATIAL SUMMATION; STANDARDIZATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VERBAL COMMUNICATION; WRITTEN LANGUAGE;

EID: 42449149927     PISSN: 08884080     EISSN: 10990720     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/acp.1413     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Aaron, P. J. (1991). Can reading disabilities be diagnosed without using intelligence test? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 178-191.
2. Baddeley, A. D. (1996). Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. van Boxtel, H. W., Snijders, J. Th., & Welten, V. J. (1980). Voorlopige verantwoording en handleiding (Temporary account and manual). Vorm III ISI-Reeks Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.
4. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn. Brain, mind experience and school. Washington: Academic Press.
5. Carney, R. N., & Levin, J. R. (2002). Pictorial illustrations still improve students learning from text. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 5-26.
6. Dean, R. S., Yekovich, F. R., & Gray, J. W. (1988). The effect of modality on long-term recognition memory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 13, 102-115.
7. Duis, S. S., Dean, R. S., & Derks, P. (1994). The modality effect: A result of methodology? International Journal of Neuroscience, 78, 1-7.
8. Ginns, P. (2005). Meta-analysis of the modality effect. Learning and Instruction, 15, 313-331.
9. Hannus, M., & Hyönä, J. (1999). Utilization of illustrations during learning of science textbook passages among low- and high-ability children. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 95-123.
10. Jong, P. F. de. (1998). Working memory deficits of reading disabled children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 70, 75-96.
11. Leu, D. J., & Kinzer, C. K. (2000). The convergence of literacy instruction with networked technologies for information and communication. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 108-127.
12. Levin, J. R., Anglin, G. J., & Carney, R. N. (1987). On empirically validating functions of pictures in prose. In: D. M. Willows, & H. A. Houghton (Eds.), The Psychology of Illustration: I. Basic Research (pp. 51-85). New York: Springer.
13. Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Mayer, R. E., & Anderson, R. B. (1992). The instructive animation: Helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 444-452.
15. Mayer, R. E., & Chandler, P. (2001). When learning is just a click away: Does simple user interaction foster deeper understanding of multimedia messages? Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 390-397.
16. Mayer, R. E., Fennell, S., Farmer, L., & Campbell, J. (2004). A personalization effect in multimedia learning. When words are in conversational style rather than formal style. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 389-395.
17. Mayer, R. E., & Sims, V. K. (1994). For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 389-401.
18. Mann, B., Newhouse, P., Pagram, J., Campbell, A., & Schulz, H. (2002). A comparison of temporal speech and text cueing in educational multimedia. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18, 296-308.
19. McLelland, J. L., McNaughton, B. L., & O'Reilly, R. C. (1995). Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: Insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. Psychological Review, 102, 419-457.
20. Nelson, J. R., Balass, M., & Perfetti, C. A. (2005). Differences between written and spoken input in learning new words. Written Language and Literacy, 8, 25-44.
21. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22. Penney, C. G. (1975). Modality effects in short-term verbal memory. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 68-84.
23. Penney, C. G. (1989). Modality effects and the structure of short-term verbal memory. Memory & Cognition, 17, 398-422.
24. Rickheit, G., Strohner, H., Müsseler, J., & Nattkemper, D. (1987). Recalling oral and written discourse. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 438-444.
25. Smits, H., Rutgers, C., Weeber, F., & Zantingh-Muis, C. (2002). 'Natuurlijk' Leerlingenboek, Methode voor natuuronderwijs. Groep7. ( 'Natural', student's book voor nature-education, 5th grade).) 's Hertogenbosch: Malmberg.
26. Tabbers, H. K. (2002). The modality of text in multimedia instructions, refining the design guidelines. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Open University of the Netherlands, Heerlen http://www.ou.nl/Docs/Expertise/ OTEC/Publicaties/huib%20tabbers/ doctoral%20dissertation%20Huib%2OTabbers%20-%20web%20version.pdf.
27. Verhoeven, L., Segers, E., Bronkhorst, J., & Boves, L. (2006). Toward interactive literacy education in the Netherlands. In M. McKenna, L. D. Labbo, R. D. Kieffer, & D. Reinking (Eds.), International Handbook of Literacy and Technology Volume II (pp. 41-53). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.