Teaching observations: Promoting development through critical reflection

Journal of Further and Higher Education

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 421-431

  Hatzipanagos, Stylianos ^a   Lygo Baker, Simon ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 42449128640     PISSN: 0309877X     EISSN: 14699486     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03098770600965425     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Akerlind, G., 2003. Growing and developing as a university teacher—ariation in meaning. Studies in Higher Education, 28(4): 375–390.
2. Barnett, R., 1992. Improving higher education: total quality care, Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
3. Berge ZL. 1998. Barriers to online teaching in post-secondary institutions: can policy changes fix it? Journal of Distance Learning Administration. 1. (2). Available online at: http://www.emoderators.com/barriers/barrier1.html (accessed 7 June 2006)
4. Cosser, M., 1998. Towards the design of a system of peer review of teaching for the advancement of the individual within the university. Higher Education, 35: 143–162.
5. Fleming, S., Shire, J., Jones, D., Pill, A., and McNamee, M., 2004. Continuing professional development: suggestions for effective practice. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 28(2): 165–177.
6. Freebody, P., 2003. Qualitative research in education: interaction and practice, London: Sage.
7. Fullerton, H., 1999. “ Observation of teaching ”. In A handbook for teaching and learning in higher education. Enhancing academic practice, Edited by: Fry, H, Ketteridge, S, and Marshall, S. London: Kogan Page.
8. Gosling D. 2002. Three models of peer observation of teaching. Available online at: http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources.asp?process = full_record§ion = generic&id = 200 (accessed 7 June 2006)
9. Hammersley-Fletcher, L., and Orsmond, P., 2004. Evaluating our peers: is peer observation a meaningful process?. Studies in Higher Education, 29(4): 489–503.
10. Hirst, P., 1984. “ Educational theory ”. In Educational theory and its foundation disciplines, Edited by: Hirst, P. London: Routledge.
11. Hodgkinson, M., 1994. Peer observation of teaching performance by action enquiry. Quality Assurance in Education, 2(2): 26–31.
12. Kemp, R., and Gosling, D., 2000. Peer observation of teaching, London: University of East London Educational Development Services. Internal Report
13. Lieberman, M., 1986. Peer review and faculty self government: a dissenting view ERIC Document Reproduction Service no. ED275282
14. Light, G., and Cox, R., 2001. Learning and teaching in higher education, London: Sage.
15. MacKinnon, M., 2001. Using observational feedback to promote academic development. The International Journal for Academic Development, 6(1): 21–28.
16. Millis, B., 1990. General information about the Peer Visit Program unpublished paper
17. Newton, J., 2003. Implementing an institution-wide learning and teaching strategy: lessons in managing change. Studies in Higher Education, 28(4): 427–441.
18. Nixon, J., 1997. “ Regenerating professionalism within the academic workplace ”. In The end of the professions?, Edited by: Broadbent, J, Dietrich, M, and Roberts, J. 86–103. London: Routledge.
19. Ramsden, P., 1992. Learning to teach in higher education, London: Routledge.
20. Shortland, S., 2004. Peer observation: a tool for staff development or compliance?. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 28(2): 219–228.
21. Van Patten, J. J., 1994. “ The politics of assessment of the professoriate ”. paper presented at the Southeastern Philosophy of Education Society Meeting, Atlanta, GA, 11–12 February
22. Wankat, P. C., and Oreovitz, F. S., 1993. Teaching engineering, New York: McGraw-Hill.
23. Yin, R. K., 2003. Case study research, design and methods, 3, London: Sage.