Comparison and evaluation of Chinese research performance in the field of bioinformatics

Scientometrics

Volumn 75, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 357-379

  Guan, Jiancheng ^a,b   Gao, Xia ^c  

^a FUDAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b BEIHANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 42449126579     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-007-1871-0     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Ajiferuke, I., Burrell, Q., Tague, J. (1988), Collaborative coefficient: A single measure of the degree of collaboration in research, Scientometrics, 14: 421-433.
2. Ball, P. (2005), Index aims for fair ranking of scientists, Nature, 436: 900.
3. Bornmann, L., Daniel, H.-D. (2005), Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work? Scientometrics, 65: 391-392.
4. Braun, T., Glänzel, W., Schubert, A. (2006), A Hirsch-type index for journals, Scientometrics, 69: 169-173.
5. Buela-casal, G., Perakakis, P., Taylor, T., Checa, P. (2006), Measuring internationality: Reflections and perspectives on academic journals, Scientomertics, 67(1): 45-65.
6. Burrell, Q. L. (2005), Measuring similarity of concentration between different informetric distribution: Two new approaches, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(7): 704-714.
7. Cole, S., Cole, J. R. (1967), Scientific output and recognition, American Sociological Review, 32: 377-390.
8. Cole, S., Cole, J. R. (1968), Visibility and the structural bases of awareness of scientific research., American Sociological Review, 33: 397-413.
9. Frame, J. D. (1977), Mainstream research in Latin America and Caribbean, Interciencia, 2: 143-148.
10. Garg, K. C., Padhi, P. (2001), A study of collaboration in laser science and technology, Scientometrics, 50(2): 415-427.
11. Garg, K. C., Padhi, P. (2002), Scientometrics of laser research in India during 1970-1994, Scientometrics, 55(2): 215-241.
12. Garg, K. C. (2002), Scientometrics of laser research in India and China, Scientometrics, 55(1): 71-85.
13. Glänzel, W. (2000), Science in Scandinavia: A bibliometric approach, Scientometrics, 48: 121-150.
14. Glänzel, W., Schubert, A. (2001), Double effort = double impact? A critical view at international coauthorship in chemistry, Scientometrics, 50: 199-214.
15. Gordon, M. D. (1980), A critical reassessment of inferred relations between multiple authorship, scientific collaboration, the production of papers and their acceptance for publication, Scientometrics, 2(3): 193-201.
16. Guan, J. C., Ma, N. (2004), A comparative study of research performance in computer science, Scientometrics, 61(3): 339-359.
17. Guan, J. C., He, Y. (2005), Comparison and evaluation of domestic and international outputs in information science & technology research of China, Scientometrics, 65(2): 215-244.
18. Hirsch, J. E. (2005), An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102: 16569-16572.
19. King, D. A. (2004) The scientific impact of nations, Nature, 430: 313-316.
20. Kostoff, R. N. (2002), Citation analysis of research performer quality, Scientometrics, 53(1): 49-71.
21. Lancaster, F. W. (1986), Vocabulary Control for Information Retrieval, 2nd ed. Arlington, VA.: Information Resources.
22. Ma, N., Guan, J. C. (2005), An exploratory study on collaboration profiles of Chinese publications in Molecular Biology, Scientometrics, 65(3): 343-355.
23. Moed, H. F. (2000), Bibliometric indicators reflect publication and management strategies, Scientometrics, 47: 323-346.
24. Moed, H. F. (2002), Measuring China's research performance using the Science Citation Index, Scientometrics, 53(3): 281-296.
25. Popov, S. B. (2005), A parameter to quantify dynamics of a researcher's scientific activity. arXiv:physics/0508113.
26. Price, D. De. S. (1963), Little Science, Big Science. Columbia University Press, New York.
27. Price, D. De. S. (1981), The analysis of scientometric metrics for policy implications, Scientometrics, 3: 47-54.
28. Patra, S. K., Mishra, S. (2006), Bibliometric study of bioinformatics literature, Scientometrics, 67(3): 477-489.
29. Schubert, A., Braun, T. (1986), Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact, Scientometrics, 9: 281-291.
30. Van Raan, A. F. J. (2006), Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups, Scientometrics, 67(1): 491-502.
31. Wormell, I. (1998), Informetric analysis of the international impact of scientific journals: how 'international' are the international journals? Journal of Documentation, 54: 584-605.
32. Westhead, D. R., Parish, J. H., Twyman, R. M. (2002), Instant Notes in Bioinformatics. BIOS Scientific Publishers Limited, UK.
33. Zitt, M., Bassecoulard, E. (1999), Another view on internationalization of scientific communication: Evolutions at the journal level. In: C. A. Macias-Chapula (Ed.), Proceedings of the Seventh Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Universidad de Colima, 558-570.