Recent advances in hearing restoration

Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine

Volumn 101, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 116-124

  Kulkarni, Kunal ^a   Hartley, Douglas E H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AIR CONDUCTION; AUDIOGRAPHY; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; ECONOMIC ASPECT; HEARING AID; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; MEDLINE; MESENCEPHALON; MICROPHONE; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; REVIEW; SIGNAL PROCESSING;

EID: 42449120584     PISSN: 01410768     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/jrsm.2007.070420     Document Type: Review

References (42)

1. Barton GR, Stacey PC, Fortnum HM, Summerfield AQ. Hearing-Impaired Children in the United Kingdom, IV: Cost-Effectiveness of Pediatric Cochlear Implantation. Ear Hear 2006;27(5):575-88
2. RNID. Statistics. 2004. See: http://www.rnid.org.uk. Last accessed 29/10/2007
3. Disorders NIoDaOC. Statistics about Hearing Disorders, Ear Infections, and Deafness. 2006. See http://www.nidcd.nih.gov/health/statistics/hearing.asp/ Last accessed 29/10/2007
4. Blanchfield BB, Feldman JJ, Dunbar JL, Gardner EN. The severely to profoundly hearing-impaired population in the United States: prevalence estimates and demographics. J Am Acad Audiol 2001;12(4):183-9
5. Leuwer RMJ. Restoration of hearing by hearing aids: conventional hearing aids - implantable hearing aids - cochlear implants - auditory brainstem implants. GMS Current Topics in Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery 2005;4. Doc03
6. Parving A The Hearing Aid Revolution: Fact or Fiction? Acta Otolaryngol 2003;123:245-8
7. Strom K. The Hearing Review 2006 dispenser survey. Hearing Review 2006;.
8. Wood SA, Lutman ME. Relative benefits of linear analogue and advanced digital hearing aids. International journal of audiology 2004;43(3):144-55
9. Barrs HKD. Hearing aids: A review of what's new. Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery 2006;134(6):1043-50
10. Leuwer R, Muller J. Restoration of hearing by hearing aids: conventional hearing aids - implantable hearing aids - cochlear implants - auditory brainstem implants. GMS Current Topics, in Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery 2005;4. Doc03
11. Lin LM, Bowditch S, Anderson MJ, May B, Cox KM, Niparko JK Amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness: speech in noise and directional hearing effects with bone-anchored hearing and contralateral routing of signal amplification. Otol Neurotol 2006;27(2):172-82
12. Niparko JK, Cox KM, Lustig LR. Comparison of the bone anchored hearing aid implantable hearing device with contralateral routing of offside signal amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness. Otol Neurotol 2003;24(1):73-8
13. Hol MK, Spath MA, Krabbe PF, et al. The bone-anchored hearing aid: quality-of-life assessment. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;130(4):394-9
14. Priwin C, Stenfelt S, Granstrom G, Tjellstrom A, Hakansson B. Bilateral bone-anchored hearing aids (BAHAs): an audiometric evaluation. Laryngoscope 2004;114(1):77-84
15. Backous DD, Duke W. Implantable middle ear hearing devices: current state of technology and market challenges. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;14(5):314-8
16. Lenarz T, Mojallal H S R. Long term study of 'Vibrant'® Soundbridge' implantable hearing aids (abstract). Abstracts of the 9th International Conference on Cochlear Implants and Related Sciences 2006;(Supplement 119):82
17. Coletti V, Carner M, Coleti L. The bionic middle ear for the failures of ossiculoplasty. Abstracts of the 9th International Conference on Cochlear Implants and Related Sciences 2006;(Supplement 119):74
18. Lefebvre P, DeCat M, Cremers CW, et al. Otologics fully implantable hearing device results (abstract). Abstracts of the 9th International Conference on Cochlear Implants and Related Sciences 2006;(Supplement 119):84
19. Chen DA, Backous DD, Arriaga MA, et al. Phase 1 clinical trial results of the Envoy System: a totally implantable middle ear device for sensorineural hearing loss. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;131(6):904-16
20. Middlebrooks JC, Bierer JA, Snyder RL. Cochlear implants: the view from the brain. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2005;15(4):488-93
21. Adams JS, Hasenstab MS, Pippin GW, Sismanis A. Telephone use and understanding in patients with cochlear implants. Ear Nose Throat J 2004;83(2):96:9-100:2-3
22. MRC. 2006. Numbers of people who have received cochlear implants in the UK
23. Haensel J, Ilgner J, Chen YS, Thuermer C, Westhofen M. Speech perception in elderly patients following cochlear implantation. Acta Otolaryngol 2005;125(12):1272-6
24. Zeng FG, Popper AN, Fay RR. Cochlear Implants: Auditory Prosthesis and Electric Hearing. New York, LLC: Springer-Verlag; 2004
25. Tyler RS, Dunn CC, Witt SA, Preece JP. Update on bilateral cochlear implantation. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;11(5):388- 93
26. Gantz BJ, Turner C, Gfeller KE, Lowder MW. Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing. Laryngoscope 2005;115(5):796-802
27. Luntz M, Shpak T, Weiss H. Binaural-bimodal hearing: concomitant use of a unilateral cochlear implant and a contralateral hearing aid. Acta Otolaryngol 2005;125(8):863-9
28. Colletti V, Carner M, Miorelli V, Guida M, Colletti L, Fiorino F. Auditory brainstem implant (ABI): new frontiers in adults and children. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;133(1):126-38
29. Ponton CW, Don M, Eggermont JJ, Waring MD, Kwong B, Masuda A. Auditory system plasticity in children after long periods of complete deafness. Neuroreport 1996;8(1):61-5. 20
30. Group UCIS. Criteria of candidacy for unilateral cochlear implantation in postlingually deafened adults II: cost-effectiveness analysis. Ear Hear 2004;25(4):336-60
31. Lenarz T, Lim HH, Reuter G, Patrick JF, Lenarz M. The auditory midbrain implant: a new auditory prosthesis for neural deafness-concept and device description. Otol Neurotol 2006;27(6):838-43
32. Fayad JN, Otto SR, Brackmann DE. Auditory brainstem implants: surgical aspects. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 2006;64:144-53
33. Societal Impact of Hearing Impairment (SIHI) study group M. Policy implications of hearing aid fitting: Report of the SIHI study. 1999.
34. Izumikawa M, Minoda R, Kawamoto K, et al. Auditory hair cell replacement and hearing improvement by Atohl gene therapy in deaf mammals. Nat Med 2005;11(3):271-6
35. Rubinstein JT. How cochlear implants encode speech. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;12(5):444-8
36. Turner CW, Gantz BJ, Vidal C, Behrens A, Henry BA. Speech recognition in noise for cochlear implant listeners: benefits of residual acoustic hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 2004;115(4):1729-35
37. Roehm PC, Hansen MR. Strategies to preserve or regenerate spiral ganglion neurons. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;13(5):294-300
38. Agerman K, Canlon B, Duan M, Ernfors P. Neurotrophins, NMDA Receptors, and Nitric Oxide in Development and Protection of the Auditory System. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1999;28:131-42
39. Cheng AG, Cunningham LL, Rubel EW. Mechanisms of hair cell death and protection. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;13(6):343-8
40. Breuskin I, Bodson M, Thelen N, et al. Strategies to regenerate hair cells: Identification of progenitors and critical genes. Hear Res 2007; . [e-pub ahead of print]
41. Fritzsch B, Pauley S, Matei V. Mutant mice reveal the molecular and cellular basis for speciWc sensory connections to inner ear epithelia and primary nuclei of the brain. Hear Res 2005;206:52-63
42. Das S, Buchman CA. Bilateral cochlear implantation: current concepts. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;13(5):290-3