Wistar Kyoto and Wistar rats differ in the affective and locomotor effects of nicotine

Physiology and Behavior

Volumn 93, Issue 1-2, 2008, Pages 177-188

  Rauhut, Anthony S ^a   Zentner, Isaac J ^a   Mardekian, Stacey K ^a   Tanenbaum, Jason B ^a  

^a DICKINSON COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Animal model; Clinical depression; Conditioned place preference; Conditioned taste avoidance; Lithium chloride; Locomotor activity; Nicotine; Rat; Reward; Sensitization; Strain differences

Indexed keywords

NICOTINE; NICOTINIC AGENT;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; AVOIDANCE BEHAVIOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONDITIONED REFLEX; DEPRESSION; DISEASE MODEL; DOSE RESPONSE; DRUG EFFECT; LEARNING; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; RAT; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; TASTE; WISTAR KYOTO RAT; WISTAR RAT;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; AVOIDANCE LEARNING; CONDITIONING, CLASSICAL; DEPRESSIVE DISORDER; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; NICOTINE; NICOTINIC AGONISTS; RATS; RATS, INBRED WKY; RATS, WISTAR; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TASTE;

EID: 42449115431     PISSN: 00319384     EISSN: 1873507X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.08.011     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Kapur S, Mann JJ. Role of the dopaminergic system in depression. Biol Psychiatry 1992;32:1-17.
2. Papeschi R, McClure DJ. Homovanillic and 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid in cerebrospinal fluid of depressed patients. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1971;25:354-8.
3. Goodwin FK, Sack RL. Central dopamine function in affective illness: evidence from precursors, enzyme inhibitors, and studies of central dopamine turnover. In: Usdin E, editor. Neuropsychopharmacology of monoamines and their regulatory enzymes. New York: Raven Press; 1974. p. 261-77.
4. Cummings JL. Psychosomatic aspects of movement disorders. Adv Psychosom Med 1985;13:111-32.
5. Anisman H, Irwin J, Sklar LS. Deficits of escape performance following catecholamine depletion: implications for behavioral deficits induced by uncontrollable stress. Psychopharmacology 1979;64:163-70.
6. Muscat R, Sampson D, Willner P. Dopaminergic mechanism of imipramine action in an animal model of depression. Biol Psychiatry 1990;28:223-30.
7. Borsini F, Meli A. The forced swimming test: its contribution to the understanding of the mechanisms of action of antidepressant drugs. In: Gessa GL, Sera G, editors. Dopamine and mental depression. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1990. p. 63-76.
8. Pare WP, Redei E. Depressive behavior and stress ulcer in Wistar Kyoto rats. J Physiol Paris 1993,;87:229-38.
9. Pare WP. Stress ulcers and open-field behavior of spontaneously hypertensive, normotensive and Wistar rats. Pavlovian J Biol Sci 1989;24:54-7.
10. Pare WP, Tejani-Butt SM. Effect of stress on the behavior and 5-HT system in Sprague and Wistar Kyoto rat strains. Int Physiol Behav Sci 1996;31:112-21.
11. Redei E, PareWP, Aird F, Kluczynski J. Strain differences in hypothalamic- pituitary-adrenal activity and stress ulcer. Am J Physiol 1994;226:R353-60.
12. Pare WP. Investigatory behavior of a novel conspecific by Wistar Kyoto, Wistar and Sprague-Dawley rats. Brain Res Bull 2000;53:759-65.
13. Malkesman O, Braw Y, Zagoory-Sharon O, Golan O, Lavi-Avnon Y, Schroeder M, et al. Reward and anxiety in genetic animal models of childhood depression. Behav Brain Res 2005;164:1-10.
14. De La Garza 2nd R. Wistar Kyoto rats exhibit reduced sucrose pellet reinforcement behavior and intravenous nicotine self-administration. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2005;82:330-7.
15. Jiao X, Pare WP, Tejani-Butt S. Strain differences in the distribution of dopamine transporter sites in rat brain. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2003;27:913-9.
16. Tejani-Butt SM, Kluczynski J, Pare WP. Strain dependent modification of behavior following antidepressant treatment. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2003;27:7-14.
17. Bardo MT, Bevins RA. Conditioned place preference: what does it add to our preclinical understanding of drug reward? Psychopharmacology 2000;153:31-43.
18. Di Chiara G. Role of dopamine in the behavioural actions of nicotine related to addiction. Eur J Pharmacol 2000;393:295-314.
19. Vastola BJ, Douglas LA, Varlinskaya EI, Spear LP. Nicotine-induced conditioned place preference in adolescent and adult rats. Physiol Behav 2002;77:107-14.
20. BardoMT,GehrkeBJ, ShortridgeBE,RauhutAS.Effects ofâ-funaltrexamine and naloxonazine on single-trial morphine-conditioned place preference and locomotor activity. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2003;74:617-22.
21. Tzschentke TM. Measuring reward with the conditioned place preference paradigm: a comprehensive review of drug effects, recent progress and new issues. Prog Neurobiol 1998;56:613-72.
22. Le Foll B, Goldberg SR. Nicotine induces conditioned place preference over a large range of doses in rats. Psychopharmacology 2005;178:481-92.
23. Calcagnetti DJ, Schechter MD. Nicotine place preference using the biased method of conditioning. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 1994;18:25-933.
24. Cunningham CL, Ferree NK, Howard MA. Apparatus bias and place conditioning with ethanol in mice. Psychopharmacology 2003;170:409-22.
25. Clarke PB, Kumar R. The effects of nicotine on locomotor activity in nontolerant and tolerant rats. Br J Pharmacol 1983;78:329-37.
26. Cailhol S, Mormede P. Strain and sex differences in the locomotor response and behavioral sensitization to cocaine in hyperactive rats. Brain Res 1999;842:200-5.
27. McCarty R, Chiueh CC, Kopin IJ. Differential behavioral responses of spontaneously hypertensive (SHR) and normotensive (WKY) rats to D-amphetamine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1980;12:53-9.
28. Yang PB, Amini B, Swann AC, Dafny N. Strain differences in the behavioral responses of male rats to chronically administered methylphenidate. Brain Res 2003;971:139-52.
29. Biala G. Calcium channel antagonists suppress nicotine-induced place preference and sensitization in rodents. Pol J Pharmacol 2003;55:327-35.
30. Papp M, Gruca P, Willner P. Selective blockade of drug-induced place preference conditioning by APPC, a functional NMDA-receptor antagonist. Neuropsychopharmacology 2002;27:727-43.
31. TodteK, TselisN,DadmarzM,GoldenG, Ferraro T,BerrettiniWH, et al. Effects of strain, behavior and age on the self-administration of ethanol, nicotine, cocaine and morphine by two rat strains. Neuropsychobiology 2001;44:150-5.
32. Gremel CM, Cunningham CL. Role of test activity in ethanol-induced disruption of place preference expression in mice. Psychopharmacology 2007;191:195-202.
33. Neisewander JL, Pierce RC, Bardo MT. Naloxone enhances the expression of morphine-induced conditioned place preference. Psychopharmacology 1990;100:201-5.
34. Vezina P, Stewart J.Morphine conditioned place preference and locomotion: the effect of confinement during training. Psychopharmacology 1987;98:257-60.
35. Sora I, Hall FS, Andrews AM, Itokawa M, Li XF,Wei HB, et al. Molecular mechanisms of cocaine reward: combined dopamine and serotonin transporter knockouts eliminate cocaine place preference. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001;98:5300-5.
36. Orsini C, Buchini F, Piazza PV, Puglisi-Allegra S, Cabib S. Susceptibility to amphetamine-induced place preference is predicted by locomotor response to novelty and amphetamine in the mouse. Psychopharmacology 2004;172:265-70.
37. Pare WP. The performance ofWKY rats on three tests of emotional behavior. Physiol Behav 1992;651:1051-6.
38. Delini-Stula A, Hunn A. Neophobia in spontaneous hypertensive (SHR) and normotensive control (WKY) rats. Behav Neural Biol 1985;43:206-11.
39. Nachman M, Ashe JH. Learned taste aversions in rats as a function of dosage, concentration, and route of administration of LiCl. Physiol Behav 1973;10:73-8.
40. Conti LH, Palmer AA, Vanella JJ, Morton PP. Latent inhibition and conditioning in rat strains which show differential prepulse inhibition. Behav Genet 2001;31:325-33.
41. Gattu M, Terry AV, Pauly JR, Buccafusco JJ. Cognitive impairment in spontaneously hypertensive rats: role of central nicotinic receptors. II. Brain Res 1997;771:104-14.
42. KumarR, Pratt JA, Stolerman IP.Characteristics of conditioned taste aversion produced by nicotine in rats. Br J Pharmacol 1983;79:245-53.
43. Pescatore KA, Glowa JR, Riley AL. Strain differences in the acquisition of nicotine-induced conditioned taste aversion. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2005;82:751-7.
44. Risinger FO, Brown MM. Genetic differences in nicotine-induced conditioned taste aversion. Life Sci 1996;58:223-9.
45. Fudala PJ, Teoh KW, Iwamoto ET. Pharmacologic characterization of nicotine-induced conditioned place preference. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1985;22:237-41.
46. Gattu M, Pauly JR, Boss KL, Summers JB, Buccafusco JJ. Cognitive impairment in spontaneously hypertensive rats: role of central nicotinic receptors. I. Brain Res 1997;771:89-103.
47. Caggiula AR, Donny EC, Epstein LH, Sved AF, Knopf S, Rose C, et al. The role of corticosteroids in nicotine's physiological and behavioral effects. Psychoneuroendocrinology 1998;23:143-59.
48. Caggiula AR, Epstein LH, Antelman SM, Saylor S, Knopf S, Perkins KA, et al. Acute stress or corticosterone administration reduces responsiveness to nicotine: implications for a mechanism of conditioned tolerance. Psychopharmacology 1993;111:499-507.
49. Acquas E, Carboni E, Leone P, Di Chiara G. SCH 23390 blocks drugconditioned place-preference and place-aversion: anhedonia (lack of reward) or apathy (lack of motivation) after dopamine-receptor blockade? .Psychopharmacology 1989;91:151-5.
50. O'Neill MF, Dourish CT, Iversen SD. Evidence for an involvement of D1 and D2 dopamine receptors in mediating nicotine-induced hyperactivity in rats. Psychopharmacology 1991;104:343-50.
51. Shoaib M, Shippenberg TS. Adrenalectomy attenuates nicotine-induced dopamine release and locomotor activity in rats. Psychopharmacology 1996;128:343-50.
52. Thierry AM, Tassin JP, Blanc G, Glowinski J. Selective activation of mesocortical DA system by stress. Nature 1976;263:242-4.
53. Grace AA. Phasic versus tonic dopamine release and the modulation of dopamine system responsivity: a hypothesis for the etiology of schizophrenia. Neuroscience 1991;41:1-24.
54. Boyson SJ, McGonigle P, Molinoff PB. Quantitative autoradiographic localization of the D1 and D2 subtypes of dopamine receptors in rat brain. J Neurosci 1986;6:3177-88.