ICZN rules - A farewell to Tubificidae (annelida, clitellata)

Zootaxa

Volumn , Issue 1744, 2008, Pages 66-68

  Erséus, Christer ^a   Wetzel, Mark J ^b   Gustavsson, Lena ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS   (United States)

^c Box 50007 ^*  (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANNELIDA; CLITELLATA; NAIDIDAE; TUBIFICIDAE;

EID: 42449101159     PISSN: 11755326     EISSN: 11755334     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1744.1.7     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Brinkhurst, R.O. (1994) Evolutionary relationships within Clitellata: an update. Megadrilogica, 5, 109-116.
2. Čekanovskaja, O.V. (1962) Vodnye maloščetinkovye červi fauny SSSR. Akademija Nauk SSSR. Moscow, Leningrad. 411 pp. [Aquatic Oligochaeta of the fauna of the USSR.]
3. Christensen, B. & Thiesen, B.F (1998) Phylogenetic status of the family Naididae (Oligochaeta, Annelida) as inferred from DNA analysis. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, 36, 169-172.
4. Ebach, M.C., Williams, D.M. & Morrone, J.J. (2006) Paraphyly is bad taxonomy. Taxon, 55, 831-832.
5. Ehrenberg, C.G. (1828) Symbolae physicae. Animalia evertebrata. Berlin. 293 pp.
6. Eisen, G. (1879) Preliminary report on genera and species of Tubificidae. Bihang till Kungliga Svenska Vetenskapsakademiens Handlingar, 5(16), 1-25 (+ 2 plates).
7. Eisen, G ( 1885) Oligochaetological researches. United States Fish and Wildlife Service. Report of the U.S. Commissioner of Fisheries, 11, 879-964 (+ 19 plates).
8. Envall, I., Källersjö, M. & Erséus, C. (2006) Molecular evidence for the non-monophyletic status of Naidinae (Annelida, Clitellata, Tubificidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 40, 570-584.
9. Erséus, C. (1990) Cladistic analysis of the subfamilies within the Tubificidae (Oligochaeta). Zoológica Scripta, 19, 57-63.
10. Erséus, C., Prestegaard, T., & Källersjö, M. (2000) Phylogenetic analysis of the Tubificidae (Annelida, Clitellata) based on 18S rDNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 15, 381-389.
11. Erséus, C., Källersjö, M., Ekman, M. & Hovmöller, R (2002) 18S rDNA phylogeny of the Tubificidae (Clitellata) and its constituent taxa: dismissal of the Naididae. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 22, 414-422.
12. Erséus, C. 2005. Phylogeny of oligochaetous Clitellata. Hydrobiologia, 535/536, 357-372.
13. Erséus, C. & Gustavsson, L. (2002) A proposal to regard the former family Naididae as a subfamily within Tubificidae (Annelida, Clitellata). Hydrobiologia, 485, 253-254.
14. Erséus, C., Gustavsson, L. & Brinkhurst, R.O. (2005) Case 3305. Tubificidae Vejdovský, 1876 (Annelida, Clitellata): proposed precedence over Naididae Ehrenberg, 1828. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 62, 226-231.
15. Hrabě, S. (1963) On Rhyacodrilus lindbergi n. sp., a new cavernicolous species of the fam. Tubificidae (Oligochaeta) from Portugal. Boletim da Sociedade Portuguesa de Ciencias Naturais (Ser. 2), 10, 52-56.
16. International Commission of Zoological Nomenclature [ICZN] (1999) International code of zoological nomenclature [the Code]. Fourth edition. The International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, c/o Natural History Museum, London, i-xxix, + 306 pp. [online version at http://www.iczn.org/iczn/index.jsp]
17. International Commission of Zoological Nomenclature [ICZN] (2007) Opinion 2167 (Case 3305). Naididae Ehrenberg, 1828 (Annelida, Clitellata): precedence over Tubificidae Vejdovský, 1876 maintained. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 64, 71-72.
18. Lamarck, J.B. (1816) Histoire naturelle des animaux sans vertèbres 3. Verdière, Paris. 585 pp.
19. Lastočkin, D.A. (1921) Issledovanija po faune Ivanovo-Voznesenskoj gubernii, organizovannye sel'sko- hozjajstvennym fakul'tetom I.-V. P. I. letom 1920 goda. 2. Fauna Oligochaeta limicola rajona issledovanija. Izvestija Ivanovo- Voznesenskogo Politehnieskogo Instituta, 4, 70-77.
20. Lastočkin, D.A. (1924) Novye i redkie Copepoda i Oligochaeta v faune Ivanovo-Voznesenskoj gubernii. Izvestija Rossijskogo gidrologičeskogo instituta, 9, 1-22. [New and rare Copepoda and Oligochaeta from Central Russia (Ivanovo-Voznesensk Government).]
21. Martin, P. (2001) On the origin of the Hirudinea and the demise of the Oligochaeta. Proceedings of the Royal Society, London, B, 268, 1089-1098.
22. Pierantoni, U. (1902) Due nuovi generi di Oligocheti marini rinvenuti nel Golfo di Napoli. Bollettino della Società dei Naturalisti in Napoli, 16, 133-117.
23. Siddall, M.E., Apakupakul, K., Burreson, E.M., Coates, K.A., Erséus, C., Källersjö, M., Gelder, S.R. & Trapido-Rosenthal, H. (2001) Validating Livanow's hypothesis: Molecular data agree that leeches, branchiobdellidans and Acanihobdella peledina are a monophyletic group of oligochaetes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 21, 346-351.
24. Sjölin, E., Erséus, C. & Källersjö, M. (2005) Phylogeny of Tubificidae (Annelida, Clitellata) based on mitochondrial and nuclear sequence data. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 35, 431-441.
25. Timm, T. (2006) Comment on the proposed precedence of Tubificidae Vejdovský, 1876 over Naididae Ehrenberg, 1828 (Annelida, Clitellata). Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 63, 48.
26. Tyler, S., Schilling, S., Hooge, M., & Bush, L.F. (2006) Turbellarian taxonomie database. Version 1.5 http://turbellaria.umaine. edu
27. Vejdovský, F. (1876) Beiträge zur Oligochaetenfaunas Böhmens. Sitzungsberichte der Königlich-Böhmischen Gesellschaft in Prag 1875, 191-201.
28. Williams, D.M., & Kociolek, J.P. (2007) Pursuit of a natural classification in diatoms: History, monophyly and the rejection of paraphyletic taxa. European Journal of Phycology, 42, 313-319.