A proposal to regard the former family Naididae as a subfamily within Tubificidae (Annelida, Clitellata)

Hydrobiologia

Volumn 485, Issue , 2002, Pages 253-256

  Erséus, Christer ^a   Gustavsson, Lena ^a  

^a SWEDISH MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Classification; Clitellata; Naididae; Naidinae; Oligochaeta; Taxonomy; Tubificidae

Indexed keywords

DNA; OCEAN HABITATS;

PHYLOGENETIC ASSESSMENTS;

MARINE BIOLOGY;

CLASSIFICATION; NOMENCLATURE; TAXONOMY;

ANNELIDA; CLITELLATA; NAIDIDAE; TUBIFICIDAE;

EID: 0036822968     PISSN: 00188158     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1021366204441     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Benham, W. B., 1890. An attempt to classify earthworms. Q. J. Micr. Sci. (n. ser.) 31: 201-315.
2. Blake, J. A. & C. Erséus, 1994. Introduction to the Annelida. In Blake, J. A. & B. Hilbig (eds). Taxonomic Atlas of the Santa Maria Basin and Western Santa Barbara Channel. Vol. 4 - The Annelida Part 1. Oligochaeta and Polychaeta: Phyllodocida (Phyllodocidae to Paralacydoniidae). Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History, Santa Barbara, California: 1-3.
3. Brinkhurst, R. O., 1971. Family Tubificidae. In Brinkhurst. R. O. & B. G. M. Jamieson (eds), Aquatic Oligochaeta of the world. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh: 444-625.
4. Brinkhurst, R. O., 1994. Evolutionary relationships within the Clitellata: an update. Megadrilogica 5: 109-116.
5. Christensen, B. & B. F. Theisen, 1998. Phylogenetic status of the family Naidldae (Oligochaeta, Annelida) as inferred from DNA analyses. J. zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 36: 169-172.
6. Ehrenberg, C. G., 1828. Symbolae physicae. Animalia evertebrata. Phytozoa. Berlin.
7. Eisen, G., 1885. Oligochaetological researches. Ann. Rep. Commiss. Fish Fisheries 1883: 879-964.
8. Erséus, C., 1982. Taxonomic revision of the marine genus Limnodriloides (Oligochaeta: Tubificidae). Verh. naturwiss. Ver. Hamburg (N. F.) 25: 207-277.
9. Erséus, C., 1990. Cladistic analysis of the subfamilies within the Tubificidae. Zool. Scr. 19: 57-63.
10. Erséus, C. & R. Grimm, 1998. Pristina proboscidea and Pristinella osborni (Oligochaeta, Naididae) from a freshwater creek near Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia, with descriptions of the genital organs of both species. Beagle, Rec. Mus. Art Galleries Northern Territory 14: 149-158.
11. Erséus, C., M. Källersjö, M. Ekman & R. Hovmöller, 2002. 18S rDNA phylogeny of the Tubificidae (Clitellata) and its constituent taxa: Dismissal of the Naididae. Mol. Phylogen. Evol. 22: 414-422.
12. Erséus. C., T. Prestegaard & M. Källersjö, 2000. Phylogenetic analysis of Tubificidae (Annelida, Clitellata) based on 18S rDNA sequences. Mol. Phylogen. Evol. 15: 381-389.
13. Ferraguti, M., C. Erséus. I. Kaygorodova & P. Martin, 1999. New sperm types in Naididae and Lumbriculidae (Annelida: Oligochaeta) and their possible phylogenetic implications. Hydrobiologia 406: 213-222.
14. Gustavsson, L. & C. Erséus, 1997. Morphogenesis of the genital ducts and spermathecae in Clitellio arenarius. Heterochaeta costata, Tubificoides benedii (Tubificidae) and Stylaria lacustris (Naididae) (Annelida, Oligochaeta). Acta zool. 78: 9-31.
15. Gustavsson, L. M. & C. Erséus, 1999. Development of the genital ducts and spermathecae in the rhyacodrilines Rhyacodrilus coccineus and Monopylephorus rubroniveus (Oligochaeta, Tubificidae). J. Morph. 242: 141-156.
16. Hennig, W., 1950. Grundzüge einer Theorie der phylogenetischen Systematik. Deutscher Zentralverlag Berlin, Berlin: 370 pp.
17. Hrabe, S., 1963. On Rhyacodrilus lindbergi n. sp., a new cavernicolous species of the fam. Tubificidae (Oligochaeta) from Portugal. Bol. Soc. Portug. Ci. Nat. (Ser. 2) 10: 52-56.
18. ICZN, 1999. International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. Fourth Edition. The International Trust for Zoological Nomeclature, c/o The Natural History Museum, London: i-xxix, + 306 pp.
19. Lamarck, J. B., 1816. Histoire naturelle des animaux sans vertèbres. 3. Paris.
20. Martin, P., 2001. On the origin of the Hirudinea and the demise of the Oligochaeta. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268: 1089-1098.
21. Michaelsen, W., 1900. Die Oligochaeten. In Spengel, J. W. (ed.), Das Tierreich, Vol. 10. Friedländer, Berlin: 1-575.
22. Müller, O. F., 1774. Vermium terrestrium et fluviatilium II. Hafniae et Lipsiae.
23. Nemec, A. F. L. & R. O. Brinkhurst, 1987. A comparison of methodological approaches to the subfamilial classification of the Naididae (Oligochaeta). Can. J. Zool. 65: 691-707.
24. Omodeo, P., 1998. History of Clitellata. Ital. J. Zool. 65: 51-73.
25. de Queiroz, K. & J. Gauthier, 1990. Phylogeny as a central principle in taxonomy: phylogenetic definitions of taxonomy. Syst. Zool. 39: 304-322.
26. de Queiroz, K. & J. Gauthier, 1992. Phylogenetic taxonomy. Ann. Rev. Evol. Syst. 23: 449-480.
27. Siddall, M. E., K. Apakupakul, E. M. Burreson, K. A. Coates, C. Erséus, M. Källersjö, S. R. Gelder, & H. Trapido-Rosenthal. 2001. Validating Livanow: Molecular data agree that leeches, branchiobdellidans and Acanthobdella peledina are a monophyletic group of oligochaetes. Mol. Phylogen. Evol. 21: 346-351.
28. Sperber, C., 1948. A taxonomical study of the Naididae. Zool. Bidr., Upps. 28: 1-296.
29. Stephenson, J., 1930. The Oligochaeta. Clarendon Press. Oxford: 978 pp.
30. Vejdovský, F., 1876. Beiträge zur Oligochaetenfauna Böhmens. Sitz.-ber- königl. Ges. Wiss. Prag 1875: 191-201.
31. Vejdovský, F., 1884. System und Morphologie der Oligochaeten. Commissionsbuchhandlung von Franz Rivnác, Prague: 166 pp. + 16 plates.