Is corporate social responsibility a strategic issue? A critical approach;A responsabilidade social é uma questão de estratégia? Uma abordagem crítica

Revista de Administracao Publica

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 7-33

  Faria, Alexandre ^a,b   Sauerbronn, Fernanda Filgueiras ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

^b FUNDAÇÃO GETÚLIO VARGAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Critical approach; Social responsibility; Strategy

Indexed keywords

EID: 42449088435     PISSN: 00347612     EISSN: 19823134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s0034-76122008000100002     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. AKTOUF, O. Governança e pensamento estratégico: uma crítica a Michael Porter. Revista de Administração de Empresas, v. 42, n. 3, p. 43-53, 2002.
2. ARNDT, J. Toward a concept of domesticated markets. Journal of Marketing, n. 43, p. 69-75, 1979.
3. ARNOLD, D. Libertarian theories of the corporation and global capitalism. Journal of Business Ethics, v. 48, n. 2, p. 155-179, 2003.
4. BANCO MUNDIAL. Public sector roles in strengthening corporate social responsibility: a baseline study. Washington, 2002. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 10 out. 2004.
5. BARON, D. Private politics, corporate social responsibility, and integrated strategy. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, v. 10, n. 1, p. 7-45, 2001.
6. BARROS, B.; PRATES, M. A arte brasileira de administrar. São Paulo: Atlas, 1996.
7. BARTUNEK, J. The proper place of organizational scholarship: a comment on Hinings and Greenwood. Administrative Science Quarterly, n. 47, p. 422-427, 2002.
8. BAUMAN, Z. Legislators and interpreters. Oxford: Polity Press, 1988.
9. BERTERO, C.; VASCONCELOS, F.; BINDER, M. Estratégia empresarial: a produção científica brasileira entre 1991 e 2002. Revista de Administração de Empresas, v. 43, n. 4, p. 48-62, 2003.
10. BLACKBURN, V.; DORAN, M.; SHADER, C. Investigating the dimensions of social responsibility and the consequences for corporate financial performance. Journal of Management Issues, n. 6, p. 195-212, 1994.
11. BOJE, D. Resistência carnavalesca ao espetáculo global. Revista de Administração de Empresas, v. 42, n. 4, p. 11-28, 2002.
12. BOJE, D. Enron spectacles: a critical dramaturgical analysis. Organization Studies, v. 25, n. 5, p. 751-774, 2004.
13. BOURGEOIS, R. Strategy and environment: a conceptual integration. Academy of Management Review, v. 5, n. 1, p. 25-39, 1980.
14. BOWEN, H. R. Social responsibilities of the businessman. New York: Harper & Row, 1953.
15. BRUNSSON, N. The Organization of hypocrisy. London: Wiley, 1989.
16. CALDAS, M.; WOOD, T. JR. For the English to see: the importation of managerial technology in late 20th-century Brazil. Organization, v. 4, n. 4, p. 517-534, 1997.
17. CARR, E. Quel é história? 8. ed. São Paulo: Paz e Terra, 2002.
18. CARROLL, A. Corporate social responsibility: evolution of a definitional construct. Business and Society, n. 38, p. 268-295, 1999.
19. CARROLL, A.; BUCHHOLTZ, A. Business and society: ethics and stakeholder management. 4. ed. Cincinnati: South-Western College, 2000.
20. CARVALHO, C.; VIEIRA, M.; GOULART, S. A trajetória conservadora da teoria institucional. RAP, v. 39, n. 4, p. 849-874, 2005.
21. CHANDLER, A. Strategy and structure: chapters in the history of American enterprise. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1962.
22. CHANDLER, A. The visible hand: the managerial revolution in American business. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, 1977.
23. CLARK, W.; DEMIRAG, I. Enron: the failure of corporate governance. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, p. 105-122, Winter 2004.
24. CLEGG, S. Modern organizations. London: Sage, 1990.
25. CLEGG, S. Lives in balance: a comment on Hinings and Greenwood's disconnects and consequences in organizational theory? Administrative Science Quarterly, v. 47, n. 3, p. 428-441, 2002.
26. DE GEORGE, R. The status of business ethics: past and future. Journal of Business Ethics, n. 6, p. 201-212, 1987.
27. DIMAGGIO, P.; POWELL, W. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizatonal fields. American Sociological Review, n. 48, p. 147-160, 1983.
28. DONALDSON, T.; PRESTON, L. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence and implications. Academy of Management Review, n. 20, p. 65-91, 1995.
29. FREDERICK, W.; POST, J.; DAVIS, K. Business and society: corporate strategy, public policy, ethics. 7. ed, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1992.
30. FREEMAN, R. Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman, 1984.
31. FRENCH, P. Corporate moral agency. In: HOFFMAN, W.; FREDERICK, R. Business ethics: readings and cases in corporate morality. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1995.
32. FRIEDMAN, M. Capitalismo e liberdade. São Paulo: Artenova, 1977.
33. GARRIGA, E.; MELÉ, D. Corporate social responsibility theories: mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, n. 53, p. 51-71, 2004.
34. GHOSHAL, S.; BARTLETT, C.; MORAN, P. A new manifesto for management. Sloan Management Review, p. 9-20, Spring 1999.
35. GUERREIR0 RAMOS, A. The new science of organizations: a reconceptualization of the wealth of nations. Toronto: University of Toronto, 1981.
36. HEALD, M. Managements responsibility to society: the growth of an idea. The Business History Review, v. 31, n. 4, p. 375-384, 1957.
37. HELD, D.; MCGREW, A. An introduction to the globalization debate. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2000.
38. HININGS, C.; GREENWOOD, R. Disconnects and consequences in organization theory? Administrative Science Quarterly, n. 47, p. 411-421, 2002.
39. HOBSBAWM, E. A era dos extremos: o breve século XX 1914-1991. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 1995.
40. HUTT, M.; MOKWA, M.; SHAPIRO, S. The politics of marketing: analyzing the parallel political marketplace. Journal of Marketing, n. 50, p. 40-51, 1986.
41. JAIME, P. O empresariado e a questão social: apontamentos para a interpretação de um novo associativismo empresarial no Brasil. RAP, v. 39, n. 4, p. 939-978, 2005.
42. JONES, M. Missing the forest for the trees: a critique of the corporate social responsibility discourse. Business and Society, n. 35, p. 7-41, 1996.
43. KLEIN, N. Sem logo: a tirania das marcas em um planeta vendido. Rio de Janeiro: Record, 2002.
44. KNIGHTS, D.; MORGAN, G. The concept of strategy in sociology: a note of dissent. Sociology, v. 24, n. 3, p. 475-483, 1990.
45. KNIGHTS, D.; MORGAN, G. Corporate strategy, organizations, and subjectivity: a critique. Organization Studies, v. 21, n. 2, p. 251-273, 1991.
46. KNIGHTS, D.; MORGAN, G. Organization theory and consumption in a post-modern era. Organization Studies, v. 14, n. 2, p. 211-234, 1993.
47. KNIGHTS, D.; STURDY, A.; MORGAN, G. The consumer rules? An examination of the rhetoric and "reality" of marketing in financial services. European Journal of Marketing, v. 28, n. 3, p. 42-54, 1994.
48. KORTEN, D. Quando as corporações regem o mundo: conseqüências da globalização da economia.: São Paulo: Futura, 1996.
49. KREITLON, M. A ética nas relações entre empresas e sociedade: fundamentos; teóricos da responsabilidade social empresarial. In: ENCONTRO ANUAL DA ANPAD. 28., Curitiba, 2004. Anais... Curitiba: Anpad, 2004.
50. LEVY, D.; EGAN, D. A Neo-Gramscian approach to corporate political strategy: conflict and accommodations in the climate change negotiations. Journal of Management Studies, v. 40, n. 4, p. 803-829, 2003.
51. LOCKE, R. The collapse of the American management mystique. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.
52. LOGSDON, J,; PALMER, D. Issues management and ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, n. 7, p. 191-198, 1988.
53. LYSONSKI, S.; DURVASULA, S.; WATSON, J. Should marketing be concerned about attitudes toward marketing and consumerism in New Zealand. A longitudinal study. European Journal of Marketing, v. 37, n. 4, p. 385-406, 2003.
54. MEYER, J.; ROWAN, B. Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, v. 83, n. 2, p. 340-363, 1977.
55. MINTZBERG, H.; AHLSTRAND, B.; LAMPEL, J. Strategy safari. London: Prentice Hall, 1998.
56. MORGAN, G. Marketing discourse and practice: towards a critical analysis. In: ALVESSON, M.; WILLMOTT, H. (Eds.). Critical management studies. London: Sage, 1992.
57. MOTTA, F. Maurício Tragtenberg: desvendando ideologias. Revista de Administração de Empresas, v. 41, n. 3, p. 64-68, 2001.
58. ORLITZKY, M.; SCHIMIDT, F.; RYNES, S. Corporate social and financial performance: a meta-analysis. Organization Studies, v. 24, n. 3, p. 403-441, 2003.
59. PAES DE PAULA, A. Tragtenberg e a resistência da crítica: pesquisa e ensino na administração hoje. Revista de Administração de Empresas, v. 41, n. 3, p. 77-81, 2001.
60. PETTIGREW, A.; THOMAS, H.; WHITTINGTON, R. Strategic management: the strengths and limitations of a field. In: PETTIGREW, A.; THOMAS, H.; WHITTINGTON, R. (Eds.). Handbook of strategy and management. London: Sage, 2002.
61. SHRIVASTAVA, P. Is strategic management ideological? Journal of Management, v. 12, n. 3, p. 363-377, 1986.
62. SKLAIR, L. Globalization, capitalism and its alternatives. 3. ed. Oxford: Oxford University, 2002.
63. SPENDER, J.-C. Business policy and strategy as a professional field. In: VOLBERDA, H.; ELFRING, T. (Eds.). Rethinking strategy. London: Sage, 2001.
64. TENÓRIO, F. G. (Org.) Gestão de ONGs: pripcipais funções gerenciai.s. Rio de Janeiro: FGV, 1997.
65. TIEMSTRA, J. Theories of regulation and the history of consumerism. International Journal of Social Economics, v. 19, n. 6, p. 3-27, 1992.
66. TRAGTENBERG, M. Administração, poder e ideologia. São Paulo: Moraes, 1980.
67. VICTOR, B.; STEPHENS, C. Business ethics: a synthesis of normative philosophy and empirical social science. Business Ethics Quarterly, v. 4, n. 2, p. 145-155, 1994.
68. VINTEN, G. The corporate governance lessons of Enron. Corporate Governance, v. 2, n. 4, p. 4-9, 2002.
69. VOLBERDA, H.; ELFRING, T. (Eds.). Rethinking strategy. London: Sage, 2001.
70. WADDOCK, S. Paeallel universes: companies, academics and the pregress of corporate citizenship. Business and society Review, v. 109, n. 1, p. 5-42, 2004.
71. WARTICK, S.; COCHRAN, P. The evolution of the corporate social performance model. Academy of Management Review, v. 10, n. 4, p. 758-769, 1985.
72. WHIPP, R. Creative deconstruction: strategy and organization. In: CLEGG, S.; HARDY, C.; NORD, W. (Orgs.). Handbook of organization studies. London: Sage, 1996.
73. WHITTINGTON, R. O que é estratégia. São Paulo: Pioneira, 2001.
74. WHITTINGTON, R. Estratégia após o modernismo: recuperando a prática. Revista de Administração de Empresas, v. 44, n. 4, p. 44-53, 2004.
75. WHITTINGTON, R. et al. Taking strategy seriously: responsibility and reform for an important social practice. Journal of Management Inquiry, v. 12, n. 4, p, 396-409, 2003.
76. WOOD, D. Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, n. 16, p. 691-718, 1991.