Modeling household vehicle transaction behavior: Competing risk duration approach

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 2014, 2007, Pages 9-16

  Mohammadian, Abolfazl ^a   Rashidi, Taha H ^a  

^a University of Illinois at Chicago   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COVARIANCE MATRIX; DECISION MAKING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PUBLIC POLICY; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT;

HAZARD-BASED DURATION; HOUSEHOLD VEHICLE OWNERSHIP; TIME-VARYING COVARIATES; VEHICLE TRANSACTIONS;

TRANSPORTATION;

EID: 42449085025     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2014-02     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Miller, E. J., D. S. Kriger, and J. D. Hunt. TCRP Report 48: Integrated Urban Models for Simulation of Transit and Land Use Policies: Guidelines for Implementation and Use. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999.
2. Wharton Econometric Forecasting Associates. An Analysis of the Automobile Market: Modeling the Long Run Determinants of the Demand for Automobiles, Volumes 1 and 2. U.S. Department of Transportation, 1977.
3. Mannering, F., and C. Wilson. A Dynamic Empirical Analysis of House-hold Vehicle Ownership and Utilization. Rand Journal of Economics, Vol. 16, No. 2, 1985, pp. 215-236.
4. Hensher, D. A., and V. Le Plastrier. Towards a Dynamic Discrete-Choice Model of Household Automobile Fleet Size and Composition. Transportation Research B, Vol. 19, No. 6, 1985, pp. 481-495.
5. Brownstone, D., D. S. Bunch, T. F. Golob, and W. Ren. A Transactions Choice Model for Forecasting Demand for Alternative-Fuel Vehicles. Working Paper UCI-ITS-WP-96-4. Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Irvine, 1996.
6. Mohammadian, A., and E. J. Miller. Nested Logit Models and Artificial Neural Networks for Predicting Household Automobile Choices: Comparison of Performance. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1807, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 92-100.
7. Yamamoto, T., R. Kitamura, and S. Kimura. Competing-Risks-Duration Model of Household Vehicle Transactions with Indicators of Changes in Explanatory Variables. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1676, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 116-123.
8. Yamamoto, T., J.-L. Madre, and R. Kitamura. An Analysis of the Effects of French Vehicle Inspection Program and Grant for Scrappage on Household Vehicle Transaction. Transportation Research B, Vol. 38, No. 10, 2004, pp. 905-926.
9. Roorda, M. J., A. Mohammadian, and E. J. Miller. Toronto Area Car Ownership Study: A Retrospective Interview and Its Applications. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1719, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 69-76.
10. Hensher, D. A., and F. L. Mannering. Hazard-Based Duration Models and Their Application to Transport Analysis. Transport Reviews, Vol. 14, No. 1, 1994, pp. 63-82.
11. Bhat, C.R. Duration Modeling: Methodological Review with Applications in Activity-Travel Analysis. Presented at 80th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2001.
12. Cox, D. R. Regression Models and Life-Tables. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Vol. 26B, 1972, pp. 186-220.
13. Kiefer, N. M. Economic Duration Data and Hazard Functions. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 26, 1988, pp. 646-679.
14. Lancaster, T. Econometric Methods for Duration of Unemployment. Econométrica, Vol. 47, 1979, pp. 939-955.
15. Han, A., and J. A. Hausman. Flexible Parametric Estimation of Duration and Competing Risk Models. Journal of Applied Econometrics, Vol.5, 1990, pp. 1-28.
16. Hui, W. Proportional Hazard Weibull Mixtures. Department of Economics, Australian National University, Canberra, 1991.
17. Cox, D. R. The Analysis of Exponentially Distributed Life-Time with Two Types of Failures. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Vol. 21B, 1959, pp. 411-421.
18. Hensher, D. The Timing of Change for Automobile Transactions: Competing Risk Multispell Specification. In Travel Behaviour Research: Updating the State of Play (J. D. Ortuzar, D. Hensher, and S. Jara-Diaz, eds.), Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1998, pp. 487-506.
19. Bhat, C. R. A Hazard-Based Duration Model of Shopping Activity with Nonparametric Baseline Specification and Nonparametric Control for Unobserved Heterogeneity. Transportation Research B, Vol. 30, No. 3, 1996, pp. 189-207.
20. Bhat, C. R. A Generalized Multiple Durations Proportional Hazard Model with an Application to Activity Behavior during the Evening Work-to-Home Commute. Transportation Research B, Vol. 30, No. 6, 1996, pp. 465-480.
21. Popkowski Leszczyc, P. T. L., and H. J. P. Timmermans. Unconditional and Conditional Competing Risk Models of Activity Duration and Activity Sequencing Decisions: An Empirical Comparison. Journal of Geographical Systems, Vol. 4, 2002, pp. 157-170.
22. Mohammadian, A., and E. J. Miller. Dynamic Modeling of Household Automobile Transactions. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1831, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 98-105.
23. Mohammadian, A., and E. J. Miller. Empirical Investigation of Household Vehicle Type Choice Decisions. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1854, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 99-106.