Time of day, exam performance and new technology

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 555-558

  Hartley, James ^a   Nicholls, Lisa ^a  

^a KEELE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LEARNING SYSTEMS; PSYCHOLOGY COMPUTING; STUDENTS;

EXAM PERFORMANCE; EXAMINATION; QUESTIONNAIRE;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

EID: 42449083256     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00768.x     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Callan, R. J. (1999). Effects of matching and mismatching students' time of day preferences. Journal of Educational Research, 92, 5, 295 299.
2. Dunn, R., Beaudry, J. S. Klavas, A. (1989). Survey of research on learning styles. Educational Leadership, 46, 6, 50 58.
3. Fiddes, D. J., Korabinski, A. A., McGuire, G. R., Youngson, M. A. McMillan, D. (2002). Does mode of delivery affect mathematics examination results? ALT-Journal, 10, 1, 60 69.
4. Folkard, S., Monk, T., Bradbury, R. Rosenthal, J. (1977). Time-of-day effects in school children's immediate and delayed recall of meaningful material. British Journal of Psychology, 68, 1, 45 50.
5. MacCann, R., Eastment, B. Pickering, S. (2002). Responding to free response examination questions: computer versus pen and paper. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33, 2, 173 188.
6. Russell, M. Plati, T. (2002). Does it matter with what I write? Comparing performance on paper, computer and portable writing devices. Current Issues in Education On-line 5, 4. Available: http://cie.ed.asu.edu/volume5/number4/
7. Smith, C. S., Folkard, S., Schmieder, R. A., Parra, L. F., Speleten, E., Almiral, H. et al (2002). Investigation of morning-evening orientations in six countries using the preferences scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 949 968.