In vitro analysis of the continuous active patellofemoral kinematics of the normal and prosthetic knee;Étude de la cinématique active continue de l'articulation fémoropatellaire d'un genou normal ou porteur d'une prothèse in vitro

Revue de Chirurgie Orthopedique et Reparatrice de l'Appareil Moteur

Volumn 88, Issue 8, 2002, Pages 797-802

  Jenny, J Y ^a   Lefebvre Y ^a,b   Vernizeau, M ^b   Lavaste, F ^b   Skalli, W ^b  

^a Centre de Traumatologie et d'Orthopedie   (France)

^b ARTS ET MÉTIERS PARISTECH   (France)

Author keywords

In vitro; Knee patellofemoral joint kinematics

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CADAVER; CAMERA; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEVICE; EPIPHYSIS; FEMUR CONDYLE; FUNCTION TEST; FUNCTIONAL ANATOMY; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; GRAVITY; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; IN VITRO STUDY; KINEMATICS; KINETICS; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PATELLA; PATELLOFEMORAL JOINT; SITTING; STANDARD; TENDON; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; BIOMECHANICS; BODY POSTURE; FEMUR; IMAGE PROCESSING; INFRARED RADIATION; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; KNEE; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; ROTATION; WEIGHT BEARING;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BIOMECHANICS; CADAVER; FEMUR; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INFRARED RAYS; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MOTION PICTURES; PATELLA; POSTURE; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; ROTATION; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 4243325432     PISSN: 00351040     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Chew JT, Stewart NJ, Hanssen AD, Luo ZP, Rand JA, AN KN: Differences in patellar tracking and knee kinematics among three different total knee designs. Clin Ortop, 1997, 345, 87-98.
2. Jenny JY, Lefèbvre Y, Vernizeau M, Lavaste F, Skalli W: Validation d'un protocole expérimental d'étude optoélectronique de la cinématique active continue de l'articulation du genou in vitro. Rev Chir Orthop, 2002, 88, 790-796.
3. Koh TJ, Grabiner MD, De Swart RJ: In vivo tracking of the human patella. J Biomech, 1992, 25, 637-643.
4. Stiehl JB, Komistek RD, Dennis DA, Keblish PA: Kinematics of the patellofemoral joint in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 2001, 16, 706-714.
5. Heegard J, Leyvraz PF, Curnier A, Rakotomanana L, Huiskes R: The biomechanics of the human patella during passive knee flexion. J Biomech, 1995, 28, 1265-1279.
6. Nagamine R, Otani T, White SE, MacCarthy DS, Whiteside LA: Patellar tracking measurement of the normal knee. J Orthop Res, 1995, 13, 115-122.
7. Rhoads DD, Noble PC, Reuben JD, Mahoney OM, Tullos HS: The effect of femoral component position on patellar tracking after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop, 1990, 260, 43-51.
8. Yoshii I, Whiteside LA, Anouchi YS: The effect of patellar button placement and femoral component design on patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop, 1992, 275, 211-219.
9. Hsu HC, Luo ZP, Rand JA, AN KN: Influence of lateral release on patellar tracking and patellofemoral contact characteristics after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 1997, 12, 74-83.
10. Akagi M, Matsusue Y, Mata T, Asada Y, Horigouchi M, Iida H, Nakamura T: Effect of rotational alignement on patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop, 1999, 366, 155-163.
11. Anouchi YS, Whiteside LA, Kaiser AD, Milliano MT: The effect of axial rotational alignment of the femoral component on knee stability and patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty demonstrated on autopsy specimens. Clin Orthop, 1993, 287, 170-177.
12. Van Kampen A, Huiskes R: The three-dimensional tracking pattern of the human patella. J Orthop Res, 1990, 8, 372-382.
13. Miller RK, Goodfellow JW, Murray DW, O'Connor JJ: In vitro measurement of patellofemoral force after three types of knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br), 1998, 80, 900-906.