Application of hidden semi-markov model to 3′ splice sites identification

Progress in Biochemistry and Biophysics

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 455-458

  Feng, Xiu Cheng ^a   Qian, Min Ping ^a   Deng, Ming Hua ^a   Ma, Xiao Tu ^a   Yan, Xi Ting ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

EM algorithm; Eukaryotic gene structure prediction; Hidden Semi Markov Model; Splicing

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; COMPUTER MODEL; EXON; GENE IDENTIFICATION; GENE LOCUS; GENE STRUCTURE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; METHODOLOGY; PROBABILITY; RNA SPLICING; STATISTICAL MODEL; TRANSLATION INITIATION;

EUKARYOTA;

EID: 4243162068     PISSN: 10003282     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Rogic S, Mackworth A K, Ouellette F B. Evaluation of gene-finding programs on mammalian sequences. Genome Research, 2001, 11 (5): 817-832
2. Rogic S, Ouellette B F, Mackworth A K. Improving gene recognition accuracy by combining predictions from two gene-finding programs. Bioinformatics, 2002, 18 (8): 1034-1045
3. Burge C, Karlin S. Prediction of complete gene structures in human genomic DNA. J Mol Biol, 1997, 268 (1): 78-94
4. Krogh A. Two methods for improving performance of an HMM and their application for gene finding. In: Gaasterland T, eds. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology. USA: The AAAI Press, 1997. 179 -186
5. Rabiner L R. A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE, 1989, 77 (2): 257-286
6. Yang W Q, Qian M P, Huang D W. Prog Biochem Biophys, 2002, 29 (1): 56-59
7. Burge C, Tuschl T, Sharp P A. Splicing of precursors to mRNAs by the spliceosomes. In: Gesteland R F, Cech T R, Atkins J F, eds. The RNA World. 2nd. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1999. 525-560
8. Reed R, Maniatis T. A role for exon sequences and splice-site proximity in splice-site selection. Cell, 1986, 46 (5): 681-690
9. Zhuang Y A, Goldstein A M, Weiner A M. UACUAAC is the preferred branch site for mammalian mRNA splicing. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA, 1989, 86 (6): 2752-2756
10. Reed R, Maniatis T. Intron sequences involved in lariat formation during pre-mRNA splicing. Cell, 1985, 41 (1): 95-105
11. Parker R, Siliciano P G, Guthrie C. Recognition of the TACTAAC box during mRNA splicing in yeast involves base pairing to the U2-like snRNA. Cell, 1987, 49 (2): 229-239
12. Burgess S, Couto J R, Guthrie C. A putative ATP binding protein influences the fidelity of branch point recognition in yeast splicing. Cell, 1990, 60 (5): 705-717
13. Solovyev V V. Finding genes by computer: Probabilistic and discriminative approaches. In: Jiang T, Smith T, Xu Y, Zhang M, eds. Current Topics in Computational Biology. USA: The MIT Press, 2002. 365-401
14. Dempster A P, Laird N M, Rubin D B. Maximum-likelihood from incomplete data via the em algorithm. J Royal Statist Soc Ser B, 1977, 39 (1): 1-38
15. Burset M, Guigo R. Evaluation of gene structure prediction programs. Genomics, 1996, 34 (3): 353-367
16. Pertea M, Lin X, Salzberg S L. GeneSplicer: a new computational method for splice site prediction. Nucleic Acids Res, 2001, 29 (5): 1185-1190
17. Langford C J, Gallwitz D. Evidence for an intron-contained sequence required for the splicing of yeast RNA polymerase II transcripts. Cell, 1983, 33 (2): 519-527