Publication and citation patterns of the Mexican contribution to a "Big Science" discipline: Elementary particle physics

Scientometrics

Volumn 60, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 131-143

  Collazo Reyes, Francisco ^a   Luńa Morales, Ma Elena ^a   Russell, Jane M ^b  

^a DEPARTAMENTO DE FÍSICA   (Mexico)

^b UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4243100538     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:SCIE.0000027676.41604.e9     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. D. CRANE, Invisible College: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1972, pp. 22-40.
2. M. J. MORAVCSIK, The contemporaneous assessment of a big science discipline. In: The Evaluation of Scientific Research, Conference, Wiley, Ciba Foundation, London Chichester, 1989, pp. 188-200.
3. P. GINSPARG, Electronic Publishing in Science, Winners and Losers in The Global Research Village, CIUC/UNESCO, Paris, 1996. [Online]. Available: http://www.epub.org.br/papers/ginsparg.htm (May, 2002).
4. A. M. RAMALHO-CORREIA, M. CASTRO-NET, The role of eprint archive in the access to, and dissemination of, scientific gray literature: LIZA a case study by the National Library of Portugal, Journal of Information Science, 28 (2002) 231-241.
5. C. M. BROWN, The E-volution of preprints in the scholarly communication of physicists and astronomers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52 (2001) 187-200.
6. G. K. YOUNGEN, Citation patterns to electronic preprints in the astronomy and astrophysics literature, College & Research Libraries, September (1998) 448-456.
7. L. LUNIN, J. M. HURD, The changing communication system of science: behavioural and organizational aspects. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51 (2000) 1276-1278.
8. B. WHITE, The World Wide Web and high-energy physics, Physics Today, (11) (1998), 30-36.
9. S. R. TOMPSON, A tale of two worlds: high-energy preprints in the 1990s, Science and Technology Libraries, 19 (2) (2001) 43-51.
10. J. GILLIES, R. CAILLIAU, How the Web Was Born: The Story of the World Wide Web, Oxford University Press, New York, 2000, p. 372.
11. C. VIZCAÍNO-SAHAGÚN, Redes, integración corporativa. Pc/Tips, (6) (1991) 26-41.
12. H. B. O'CONNELL, Physicists thriving with paperless publishing. ArXiv:physics/0007040 (2000) 2 1-17, [Online], Available: http://www.stanford. edu/spires/hep, (September, 2002)
13. P. A. KREITZ, L. ADDIS, H. GALIC, T. JOHNSON, The virtual library action: collaborative international control of higher-energy physics pre-prints, Publishing Research Quarterly, 13 (2) (1997) 24.
14. J. LANGER, Physicists in the new era of electronic publishing: new electronic opportunities for scientific communication, and changes in how scientists use journals, are prompting a complete revaluation, Physics Today [Online], (2002), Available: http://www.aip.org/pt/vol-53/iss-8/p35.html, (May, 2002).
15. J. M. RUSSELL, Scientific communication at the beginning of the twenty-first century. International Social Science Journal, 168 (2001) 273-282.
16. K. MANUEL, The place of e-prints in the publication patterns of physical scientists, Science & Technology Libraries, 20 (1) (2001) 59-85.
17. N. R. KAPLAN, M. L. NELSON, Determining the publication impact of a digital library, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51 (1993) 324-339.
18. F. COLLAZO-REYES, Participación del CINVESTAV en disciplinas de gran ciencia: física de partículas elementales, Avance y Perspectiva, 21 (2002) 361-374.
19. M. E. LUNA-MORALES, F. COLLAZO-REYES, El síndrome Big Science y su influencia en el proceso de maduración de la física mexicana de partículas elementales, Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 24 (4) (2002) 186-197.
20. G. HERRERA-CORRAL, Física experimental de altas energías. Avan ce y Perspectiva, 12 (1993) 81-85.
21. F. COLLAZO-REYES, M. E. LUNA-MORALES, Física mexicana de campos y partículas: organización, producción y crecimiento. Interciencia, 27 (2002) 347-353.
22. M. J. MORAVCSIK, The crisis in particles physics. Research Policy, 6 (1977) 78-107.
23. S. S. SCHWEBER, Physics community and the crisis in physical theory, Physics Today, (4) (1993) 34-40.
24. SOCIEDAD MEXICANA DE FÍSICA, FEDERACIÓN LATINOAMERICANA DE SOCIEDADES DE FÍSICA, Catálogo Latinoamericano de Programas y Recursos Humanos en Física, SMF: FLSF, México, (1987-2000).
25. D. H. WHITE, D. SULLIVAN, E. J. BARBONI, The interdependence of theory and experiment in revolutionary science: the case of Parity Violation, Social Studies of Science, 9 (1979) 303-327.
26. D. H. WHITE, D. SULLIVAN, Social currents in Weak Interactions: The controversy surrounding possible violation of the S = Q selection rule yields useful insights into the rewards system of a scientific field, Physics Today, April (1979) 40-47.
27. D. SULLIVAN, D. KOESTER, D. H. WHITE, R. KERN, Understanding rapid theoretical change in particle physics: A month-by-month co-citation analysis, Scientometrics, 2 (1980) 309-319.
28. D. KOESTER, D. SULLIVAN, D. H. WHITE, Theory selection in particle physics: A quantitative case study of the evolution of weak-electromagnetic unification theory, Social Studies of Science, 12 (1982) 73-100.