Geographical variation in phenology of Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl and Quercus robur L. oak grown in a greenhouse

Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 179-188

  Jensen, J S ^a   Hansen, J K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Early test; Genetic properties; Pedunculate oak; Provenance testing; Sessile oak

Indexed keywords

GENES; GREENHOUSE GASES; GROWTH KINETICS; PIGMENTS;

GENETIC PROPERTIES; LEAF YELLOWING; PROVENANCE TESTING;

FORESTRY;

GENES; GREENHOUSE GASES; GROWTH; PIGMENT; QUERCUS PETRAEA; QUERCUS ROBUR;

QUERCUS PETRAEA; QUERCUS ROBUR;

EID: 42349101563     PISSN: 02827581     EISSN: 16511891     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02827580801995331     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Baliuckas, V. & Pliura, A. (2003). Genetic variation and ecological sensitivity of Quercus robur populations and open pollinated families. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 18, 305-319.
2. Baliuckas, V., Lagerström, T. & Eriksson, G. (2001). Within-population variation in juvenile growth rhythm and growth in Quercus robur L. and Fagus sylvatica L. Forest Genetics, 8, 259-269.
3. Cieslar, A. (1923). Untersuchungen über die Wirtschaftliche Bedeutung der Herkunft des Saatgutes der Stieleiche. Centralblatt der Gesamtes Forstwesen, 49, 97-149.
4. Deans, J. D. & Harvey, F. J. (1995). Phenologies of sixteen European provenances of sessile oak growing in Scotland. Forestry, 68, 265-273.
5. Deneke, F. J. (1974). A red oak provenance trial in Kansas. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science, 77, 195-200.
6. Ducousso, A., Guyon, J. P. & Kremer, A. (1996). Latitudinal and altitudinal variation of bud burst in western populations of sessile oak (Quercus petraea (Matt) Liebl). Annales de Sciences Forestières, 53, 775-782.
7. Eriksson, G. (1998). Evolutionary forces influencing variation among populations of Pinus sylvestris. Silva Fennica, 32, 173-184.
8. Eriksson, G., Ekberg, I. & Clapham, D. (2006). An introduction to forest genetics (3rd ed.). University of Agricultural Sciences.
9. Falconer, D. S. & Mackay, T. F. C. (1996). Introduction to quantitative genetics (4th edn). Harlow, UK: Longman Scientific and Technical.
10. FAO (2005). New_LocClim. Local Climate Estimator. ESA Newsletter No. 26 2004, pp. 1-5.
11. Forestry Commission UK (2007). Tree phenology: Does flushing date vary with seed origin? Retrieved August 24, 2007, from http://www. forestresearch.gov.uk/fr//INFD-5ZYMMX
12. Gilmour, A. R., Cullis, B. R., Welham, S. J. & Thompson, R. (1999). ASReml reference manual. Agricultural Biometric Bulletin No. 3, Orange, Australia.
13. Gilmour, A. R., Gogel, B. J., Cullis, B. R., Welham, S. J. & Thompson, R. (2002). ASReml user guide, Release 1.0. Hemel Hempstead: VSN International.
14. Hubert, J. & Cundall, E. (2006). Choosing provenance in broad-leaved trees. Forestry Commission Information Note 82. Edinburgh: Forestry Commission.
15. Jensen, J. S. (1993). Provenances of Quercus robur and Q. petraea in Denmark. Dissertation, Royal Agricultural and Veterinary University, Copenhagen, and Danish Forest and Landscape Research Institute. Forskningsserien 2. (In Danish with English summary.)
16. Jensen, J. S. (2000). Provenance variation in phenotypic traits in Quercus robur and Quercus petraea in Danish provenance trials. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 15, 297-308.
17. Jensen, J. S. & Deans, J. D. (2004). Late autumn frost resistance of twelve north European provenances of Quercus species. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 19, 390-399.
18. Jensen, J. S., Wellendorf, H., Jager, K., De Vries, S. M. G. & Jensen, V. (1997). Analysis of a 17-year old Dutch open-pollinated progeny trial with Quercus robur (L.). Forest Genetics, 4, 139-147.
19. Jones, E. W. (1959). Biological flora of the British Isles. Quercus L. Journal of Ecology, 47, 169-222.
20. Kienitz, M. (1879). Uber formen und Abarten heimischer Waldbaume. Forstliches Zeitschrift, 241-160, 297-327.
21. Kleinschmit, J. (1993). Intraspecific variation of growth and adaptive traits in European oak species. Annales de Sciences Forestières, 50(Suppl. 1), 166-185.
22. Kleinschmit, J. & Svolba, J. (1995). Intraspecific variation of growth and stem form in Quercus robur and Q. petraea. In W. Mauer & U. Tabel (Eds.), Genetics and silviculture with special emphasis on the indigenous oak tree species. Proceedings of the 22nd International Meeting of the Working Party of Forest Genetics and Forest Plant Breeding. Mitteilungen aus der Forstlichen Versuchsanstalt Rheinland-Pfalz (Vol. 34, pp. 75-99).
23. König, A. & Liepe, K. (1996). Frost hardiness studies on sessile oak: Evaluation of growth chamber experiments and outdoor observations. In A. Kremer & H. Muhs (Eds.), Inter- and intra-specific variation in European oaks. Evolutionary implications and practical consequences (pp. 319-336). Brussels: European Commission.
24. Koski, V. (2004). Breeding plans in case of global warming. XIV EUCARPIA Congress on Adaption in Plant Breeding, held on 31 July-4 August, 1995, Jyvaskyla, Finland. Euphytica, 92, 235-239.
25. Koski, V. & Sievänen, R. (1985) Timing of growth cessation in relation to the variations in the growing season. In P. M. A. Tigerstedt, P. Puttonen & V. Koski (Eds.), Crop physiology of forest trees (pp. 167-193). Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
26. Kremer, A., Zanetto, A. & Ducousso, A. (1997). Multilocus and multitrait measures of differentiation for gene markers and phenotypic traits. Genetics, 145, 1229-1241.
27. Kriebel, H. B. & Wang, C. W. (1962). The interaction between provenance and degree of chilling in bud-break of sugar maple. Silvae Genetica, 11, 125-130.
28. Lande, R. (1992). Neutral theory of quantitative genetic variance in an island model with local extinction and recolonization. Evolution, 46, 381-389.
29. Ledig., F. T. (1993). Genetics of oak species and the spectre of global climate change. Annales de Sciences Forestières, 50(Suppl. 1), 456-460.
30. Liepe, K. (1993). Growth chamber trial on frost hardiness and field trial on bud burst of sessile oak (Quercus petraea Liebl and Q. robur L.). Annales de Sciences Forestières, 50(Suppl. 1), 208-214.
31. Mckay, J. & Latta, R. G. (2002). Adaptive population divergence: Markers, QTLs and traits. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 17, 285-291.
32. Namkoong, G. (1984). Strategies for gene conservation in tree breeding. In C. W. Yeatman, D. Kafton & G. Wilkes (Eds.), Plant genetic resources. A conservation imperative, a selected symposium 87 (pp. 93-109). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
33. Nielsen, C. N. & Jørgensen, F. V. (2002). Phenology and diameter increment in seedlings of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) as affected by different soil water contents: Variation between and within provenances. Forest Ecology and Management, 174, 233-249.
34. Rehfeldt, G. E. (1994). Adaptations of Picea engelmannii populations to the heterogeneous environments of the intermountain west. Canadian Journal of Botany, 72, 1197-1208.
35. Rehfeldt, G. E., Ying, C. C., Spittlehouse, D. L. & Hamilton, D. A. (1999). Genetic responses to climate in Pinus contorta: Niche breadth, climate change, and reforestation. Ecological Monographs, 69, 375-407.
36. St. Clair, J. B. & Howe, G. T. (2007). Genetic maladaptation of coastal Douglas-fir seedlings to future climates. Global Change Biology, 13, 1441-1445.
37. Siegismund, H. R. & Jensen, J. S. (2001). Intrapopulation and interpopulation genetic variation of Quercus in Denmark. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 16, 103-116.
38. Spitze, K. (1993). Population structure in Daphnia obtusa: Quantitative genetic and aloozymic variation. Genetics, 135, 367-374.
39. Stephan, B. R., Venne, H. & Liepe, K. (1996). Intraspecific variation of Quercus petraea in relation to budburst and growth cessation. In A. Kremer & H. Muhs (Eds.), Inter- and intra-specific variation in European oaks. Evolutionary implications and practical consequences (pp. 165-184). Brussels: European Commission.
40. Topp, G. C., Davies, J. L. & Annan, A. P. (1980). Electromagnetic determination of soil water content measurements in coaxial transmission lines. Water Resource Research, 16, 574-582.
41. Turok, J., Kremer, A.& de Vries, S. M. G. (Eds.) (1998). First Euforgen Meeting on Social Broadleaves, Bordeaux, France, 23-25 October 1997.
42. Zanetto, A., Roussel, G. & Kremer, A. (1994). Geographic variation of inter-specific differentiation between Quercus robur L. and Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. Forest Genetics, 1, 111-123.