Evolutionary forces influencing variation among populations of Pinus sylvestris

Silva Fennica

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 173-184

  Eriksson, Gösta ^a  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION; GENETIC DRIFT; MUTATION; NATURAL SELECTION; SCOTS PINE;

GYMNOSPERMAE; PINUS SYLVESTRIS;

EID: 0031660851     PISSN: 00375330     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14214/sf.694     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Birks, J.S. & Kanowski, P. J. 1988. Interpretation of the coniferous resin. Silvae Genetica 37: 29-39.
2. Bradshaw, A.D. 1991. Genostasis and the limits to evolution. The Croonian lecture, 1991. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 333: 289-305.
3. Brandon, 1990. Adaptation and environment. Princeton Univ. Press. Princeton, NJ. 214 p.
4. Bush, R.M. & Smouse, P. 1991. Evidence for the adaptive significance of allozymes in forest trees. New Forests 6: 179-196.
5. Eiche, V. 1955. Spontaneous chlorophyll mutations in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). Medd. Stat. Skogs-Forskn.45: 13, 69 p.
6. _ 1966. Cold damage and plant mortality in experimental provenance plantations with Scots pine in northern Sweden. Stu. For. Suec. 36. 218 p.
7. Ekberg, I., Eriksson, G., Namkoong, G., Nilsson, C. & Norell, L. 1994. Genetic correlations for growth rhythm and growth capacity at ages 3-8 years in provenance hybrids of Picea abies. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 9: 25-33.
8. Ellstrand, N.C. & Elam, D.R. 1993. Population genetic consequences of small population size: Implications for plant conservation. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 24: 217-242.
9. Endler, J. 1986. Natural selection in the wild. Princeton Univ. Press. Princeton, NJ. 336 p.
10. _ & Mac Lelland, T. 1988. The process of evolution: Toward a newer synthesis. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 19: 395-421.
11. Eriksson, G. 1963. Induction of waxy mutants in maize by acute and chronic gamma irradiation. Hereditas 50: 161-178.
12. _ 1991. Challenges for forest geneticists. Silva Fennica 25: 257-269.
13. _ , Andersson, S., Eiche, V., Ifver, J. & Persson, A. 1980. Severity index and transfer effects on survival and volume production of Pinus sylvestris in northern Sweden. Studia For. Suec. 156. 32 pp.
14. _ , Andersson, S., Eiche, V. & Persson, A. 1976. Variation between and within populations in a provenance trial of Pinus sylvestris at Nordanås, lat 64°19′, long. 18°19′, alt. 400. Studia For. Suec. 133. 46 pp.
15. _ , Ilstedt, B., Nilsson, C. & Ryttman, H. 1987. Within- and between-population variation of growth and stem quality in a 30-year-old Pinus sylvestris trial. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 2: 301-314.
16. _ , Namkoong, G. & Roberds, J. 1993. Dynamic gene conservation for uncertain futures. For. Ecol. Managm. 62: 15-37.
17. Forrest, G.I. 1994. Biochemical markers in tree improvement programmes. For. Abstr. 55: 123-153.
18. Futuyma, D.J. 1983. Evolutionary interactions among herbivorous insects and plants. Chapter 10 in Co-evolution (Eds. D Futuyma & M. Slatkin), Sunderland, Mass. Sinauer Ass. cop.: 207-231.
19. Giertych, M. 1991. provenance variation in growth and phenology. In Giertych, M. & Matyas, CS. (eds.) Genetics of Scots pine. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Oxford, New York, Tokyo, p 87-101.
20. Govindaraju, D.R. 1988. Relationship between dispersal ability and levels of gene flow in plants. Oikos 52: 31-35.
21. Gregorius, H-R. & Bergmann, F. 1995. Analysis of isoenzyme genetic profiles observed in forest tree populations. In Baradat, Ph., Adams, W.T. & Müller-Starck, G. (eds.) Population Genetics and Genetic Conservation of Forest Trees, p. 79-96.
22. Gullberg, U., Yazdani, R., Rudin, D. & Ryman, N. 1985. Allozyme variation in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) in Sweden. Silvae Genetica 34: 193-201.
23. Haldane, J.B.S. 1932. The causes of evolution. London, Longmans, Green. 234 p.
24. Hartle, D.L. & Clark, A.G. 1989. Principles of population genetics. Sinauer Ass. Inc., Sunderland, MA. 682 p.
25. Ingestad, T. 1979. Nitrogen stress in birch seedlings II. Physiol. Plant. 45: 149-157.
26. Karhu, A., Hurme, P., Karjalainen, M., Karvonen, P., Kärkkäinen, K., Neale, D. & Savolainen, O. 1996. Do molecular markers reflect patterns of differentiation in adaptive traits in conifers? Theor. Appl. Gen. 93: 215-221.
27. Kärkkäinen, K., Koski, V. & Savolainen, O. 1996. Geographical variation in the inbreeding depression of Scots Pine. Evolution 50: 111-119.
28. Karvonen, P. & Savolainen, O. 1993. Variation and inheritance of ribosomal DNA in Pinus sylvestris L. (Scots pine). Heredity 71: 614-622.
29. Kinnloch, B.B., Westfall, R.D. & Forrest, G.I. 1986. Caledonian Scots pine: Origins and genetic structure. New Phytol. 104: 703-729.
30. Koski, V. 1970. A study on pollen dispersal as a mechanism of gene flow in conifers. Comm. Inst. For. Res. 4: 513-520.
31. Kramer, P.J. 1986. The role of physiology in forestry. Tree Phys. 2: 1-16.
32. Kremer, A. 1995. Use of biochemical and molecular markers for identification of forest reproductive material. In Terrason, D. (ed.) Quality of forest reproductive material in the field of application of European Community rules. Cemagref Editions: 13-24.
33. _ & Larson, P. 1983. Genetic control of height growth components in jack pine seedlings. Forest Science 29: 451-464.
34. _ , Zanetto, A. & Ducousso, A. 1997. Multilocus and multitrait measures of differentiation for gene markers and phenotypic traits. Genetics 145: 1229-1241.
35. Lande, R. & Barrowclough, G.F. 1987. Effective population size, genetic variation, and their use in population management. In Soulé, M.E. (ed.) Viable populations for conservation. New York, Cambridge Univ. Press, p. 87-123.
36. Langlet, O. 1936. Studier över tallens fysiologiska variabilitet och dess samband med klimatet. Medd. Stat. Skogsförs. 29. 188 p.
37. Levins, R. 1963.Theory of fitness in a heterogeneous environment. II. Developmental flexibility and niche selection. Amer. Natural. 97: 75-90.
38. Lindgren, D., Yazdani, R., Lejdebro, M.-L. & Lejdebro, L.-G. 1991. The spread of pollen from a point source. In Lindgren, D. (ed.) Pollen contamination in seed orchards. Report, Dept. For. Genet. Plant Phys., Swed. Univ. Agr. Sci. 10: 86-99.
39. Mattila, A. & Vakkari, P. 1997. Genetic variation of Quercus robur and Ulmus laevis in Finland. Proc. Nordic Group of Forest Genetics and Tree Breed. Meet, Estonia, June 3-7, 1996 (Eds Kurm, M. & Tamm, U.). Forestry Studies XXVIII: 63-68.
40. Mayr, E. 1988. Toward a philosophy of biology: Observations of an evolutionist. The Belknap Press of Harward Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA/London. 564 p.
41. Mejnartowicz, L. 1979. Genetic variation in some isozyme loci in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). Arboretum Kornickie Rocznik 24: 91-104.
42. Neale, D.B. & Sederoff, R.R. 1988. Inheritance and evolution of conifer organelle genomes. In Hanover, J.W. & Keathley, D.E. (eds.) Genetic manipulation of woody plants. Basic Life Sci. 44: 251-264.
43. Persson, B. 1994. Effects of climate and provenance transfer on survival, production and stem quality of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) in northern Sweden. Report 37, Dept. For. Yield Res. 192 p.
44. Petit, R.J., Kremer, A. & Wagner, D.B. 1993. Geographic structure of chloroplast DNA polymorphisms in European oaks. Theor. Appl. Gen. 87: 122-128.
45. Remröd, J. 1976. Val av tallprovenienser i norra Sverige - analys av överlevnad, tillväxt och kvalitet i 1951 års proveniensförsök. Royal Coll. For., Dept. For. Genet., Res. Notes 19, 132 p (English summary).
46. Rhoades, D.F. 1985. Offensive-defensive interactions between herbivors and plants: Their relevance in herbivor population dynamics and ecological theory. The Amer. Natural. 125: 205-238.
47. Savolainen, O. 1991.Background pollinations in seed orchards. In Lindgren, D. (ed.) Pollen contamina-tion in seed orchards. Report, Dept. For. Genet. Plant Phys., Swed. Univ. Agr. Sci. 10: 6-13.
48. _ 1996. Pines beyond the polar circle: Adaptation to stress conditions. Euphytica 92: 139-145.
49. _ & Kärkkäinen, K. 1992. Effects of forest management on gene pools. New Forests 6: 329-345.
50. Schmid, B. 1992. Phenotypic variation in plants. Evolutionary trends in plants 6: 45-60.
51. Skrøppa, T. 1982. Genetic variation in growth rhythm characteristics within and between natural populations of Norway spruce. A preliminary report. Silva Fennica 16: 160-167.
52. _ & Magnussen, S. 1993. Provenance variation in shoot growth components of Norway spruce. Silvae Genetica 42: 111-120.
53. Slatkin, M. 1987. Gene flow and the geographic structure of natural populations. Science 236: 787-792.
54. Stadler, L.J. & Sprague, G.F. 1936. Some observations of gene variability and spontaneous mutation. Spragg. Mem. Lect. Plant Breed. (3rd Ser.) Mich. State Coll., East Lansing 1942: 3-15.
55. Szmidt, A.E., Wang, X-R. & Lu, M-Z. 1996. Empirical assessment of allozyme and RAPD variation in Pinus sylvestris (L.) using haploid tissue analysis. Heredity 76: 412-420.
56. Tobolski, J.J. & Hanover, J.W. 1971. Genetic variation in the monoterpenes of Scotch pine. Forest Science 17: 293-299.