The development of an automated sentence generator for the assessment of reading speed

Behavioral and Brain Functions

Volumn 4, Issue , 2008, Pages

  Crossland, Michael D ^a   Legge, Gordon E ^b   Dakin, Steven C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUTOMATIC SPEECH RECOGNITION; COGNITION; COMPREHENSION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LINGUISTICS; NEUROSCIENCE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; READING; VELOCITY;

EID: 42349096808     PISSN: 17449081     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1744-9081-4-14     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Hazel CA Latham Petre K Armstrong RA Benson MT Frost NA Visual function and subjective quality of life compared in subjects with acquired macular disease Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000, 41:1309-1315. 10798645
2. Krieger AA The partially sighted patient: A study of 917 cases Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1967, 65:544-590. 1310283 6083069
3. Mangione CM Berry S Spritzer K Janz NK Klein R Owsley C Lee PP Identifying the content area for the 51-item national eye institute visual function questionnaire Arch Ophthalmol 1998, 116:227-233. 9488276
4. Wolffsohn JS Cochrane AL The changing face of the visually impaired: The kooyong low vision clinic's past, present, and future Optom Vis Sci 1999, 76:747-754. 10.1097/00006324-199911000-00023 10566859
5. McClure ME Hart PM Jackson AJ Stevenson MR Chakravarthy U Macular degeneration: Do conventional measurements of impaired visual function equate with visual disability? Br J Ophthalmol 2000, 84:244-250. 1723404 10684832 10.1136/bjo.84.3.244
6. Legge GE Psychophysics of reading in normal and low vision Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum 2006
7. Legge GE Pelli DG Rubin GS Schleske MM Psychophysics of reading - i. Normal vision Vision Res 1985, 25:239-252. 10.1016/0042-6989(85)90117-8 4013091
8. Legge GE Rubin GS Luebker A Psychophysics of reading - v. The role of contrast in normal vision Vision Res 1987, 27:1165-1177. 10.1016/ 0042-6989(87)90028-9 3660667
9. Legge GE Rubin GS Pelli DG Schleske MM Psychophysics of reading - ii. Low vision Vision Res 1985, 25:253-265. 10.1016/0042-6989(85)90118-X 4013092
10. Legge GE Ross JA Luebker A LaMay JM Psychophysics of reading viii: The minnesota low-vision reading test Optom Vis Sci 1989, 66:843-853. 10.1097/00006324-198912000-00008 2626251
11. Subramanian A Pardhan S The repeatability of mnread acuity charts and variability at different test distances Optom Vis Sci 2006, 83:572-576. 10.1097/01.opx.0000232225.00311.53 16909082
12. Virgili G Cordaro C Bigoni A Crovato S Cecchini P Menchini U Reading acuity in children: Evaluation and reliability using mnread charts Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004, 45:3349-3354. 10.1167/iovs.03-1304 15326160
13. Carver R Reading rate: A review of research and theory San Diego: Academic Press 1990
14. Lovie-Kitchin JE Bowers AR Woods RL Oral and silent reading perfomance with macular degeneration Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2000, 20:360-370. 10.1016/S0275-5408(99)00088-5 11045244
15. Watson GR Wright V De l'Aune W The efficacy of comprehension training and reading practice for print readers with macular loss J Vis Impair Blind 1992, 86:37-43.
16. Just M Carpenter P Keller T Eddy W Thulborn K Brain activation modulated by sentence comprehension Science 1996, 274:114-116. 10.1126/ science.274.5284.114 8810246
17. Douglas G Grimley M McLinden M Watson L Reading errors made by children with low vision Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2004, 24:319-322. 10.1111/ j.1475-1313.2004.00204.x 15228509
18. Neale MD Neale analysis of reading ability manual London: Macmillan 1958
19. Spooner A Baddeley A Gathercole S Can reading accuracy and comprehension be separated in the neale analysis of reading ability? Br J Educ Psychol 2004, 74:187-204. 10.1348/000709904773839833 15130187
20. Brainard DH The psychophysics toolbox Spat Vis 1997, 10:433-436. 9176952
21. Pelli DG The videotoolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies Spat Vis 1997, 10:437-442. 9176953
22. Legge G Ross J Luebker A LaMay J Psychophysics of reading. Viii. The minnesota low-vision reading test Optom Vis Sci 1989, 66:843-853. 10.1097/00006324-198912000-00008 2626251
23. Forster KI Visual perception of rapidly presented word sequences of varying complexity Percept Psychophys 1970, 8:215-221.
24. Rubin GS Turano K Reading without saccadic eye movements Vision Res 1992, 32:895-902. 10.1016/0042-6989(92)90032-E 1604858
25. Rubin GS Turano K Low vision reading with sequential word presentation Vision Res 1994, 34:1723-1733. 10.1016/0042-6989(94)90129-5 7941378
26. BNC World The british national corpus, version 2 Oxford University Computing Services 2001
27. Bland JM Altman DG Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement Lancet 1986, 1(8476):307-310. 2868172