Choose your "buddy icon" carefully: The influence of avatar androgyny, anthropomorphism and credibility in online interactions

Computers in Human Behavior

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 1473-1493

  Nowak, Kristine L ^a   Rauh, Christian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

Androgyny; Anthropomorphism; Avatars; Computer mediated communication; Person perception; Uncertainty reduction

Indexed keywords

ONLINE SYSTEMS; SENSORY PERCEPTION;

ANDROGYNY; AVATARS; COMPUTER MEDIATED COMMUNICATION; PERSON PERCEPTION;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

EID: 42249095630     PISSN: 07475632     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2007.05.005     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Ambady N., Hallahan M., and Rosenthal R. On judging and being judged accurately in zero-acquaintance situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69 3 (1995) 518-529
2. Argyle M. Clothes, Physique, and other aspects of appearance. In: Argyle M. (Ed). Bodily communication. 2nd ed. (1988), International Universities Press, Inc. 233-254
3. Bailenson J.N., Swinth K.R., Hoyt C.L., Persky S., Dimov A., and Blascovich J. The independent and interactive effects of embodied agent appearance and behavior on self-report, cognitive, and behavioral markers of copresence in immersive virtual environments. Presence-Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 14 (2005) 379-393
4. Balsamo A. Forms of technological embodiment: Reading the body in contemporary culture. In: Featherstone M., and Burrows R. (Eds). Cyberspace/Cyberbodies/Cyberpunk: Cultures of technological embodiment (1995), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA 215-237
5. Becker B., and Mark G. Social conventions in computer-mediated communication: A comparison of three online shared virtual environments. In: Schroeder R. (Ed). The social life of avatars: Presence and interaction in shared virtual environments (2002), Springer-Verlag, London 19-39
6. Bem S.L. Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychology Review 88 4 (1981) 354-364
7. Benford, S., Greenhalg, C., Bowers, J., Snowdon, D., & Fahlén, L. (1995). User embodiment in collaborative virtual environments. Paper presented at the CHI'95 Mosaic of Creativity, Denver, CO.
8. Berger C., and Calabrese R. Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research 1 (1975) 99-112
9. Biocca F., and Nowak K.L. Plugging your body into the telecommunication system: Mediated embodiment, media interfaces, and social virtual environments. In: Atkin D., and Lin C. (Eds). Communication technology and society (2002), Hampton Press, Cresskill, NJ 407-447
10. Bull P., and Rumsey N. The social psychology of facial appearance (1988), Springer-Verlag, New York
11. Burgoon J. Nonverbal signals. In: Knapp M.L., and Miller G.R. (Eds). Handbook of interpersonal communication (1994), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA 229-285
12. Cherny, L. (1994). Gender differences in text-based virtual reality. Paper presented at the cultural performances: Proceedings of the third Berkley women and language conference. Berkley, CA.
13. Clark N. Rear-view mirror shades: The recursive generation of the Cyberbody, Cyberspace/Cyberbodies/Cyberpunk: Cultures of technological embodiment. (pp. 113-133) (1995), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA
14. Clatterbuck G. Attributional confidence and uncertainty. Human Communication Research 5 2 (1979) 147-157
15. Compeau D.R., and Higgins C.A. Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly 19 2 (1995) 189-212
16. Compeau D., Higgins C.A., and Huff S. Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: A longitudinal study. MIS Quarterly 23 2 (1999) 145
17. Cornetto K., and Nowak K.L. Sex categorization and usernames in CMC: Examining people's perceptions and accuracy. Cyberpsychology and Behavior 9 4 (2006) 377-387
18. Damer B. Avatars! Exploring and building virtual worlds on the Internet (1997), Peachpit Press, Berkley, CA
19. Diamond, G. (2000). Liquid Chat II. Downloaded from .
20. Dion K., Berscheid E., and Walster E. What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 24 3 (1972) 285-290
21. DiSalvo, C., & Gemperle, F. (2003). From seduction to fulfillment: The use of anthropomorphic form in design. In Proceedings of the 2003 international conference on designing pleasurable products and interfaces, June 23-26, 2003, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
22. Eastin M.S., and LaRose R. Internet self-efficacy and the psychology of the digital divide. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 6 1 (2000). http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol6/issue1/eastin.html October 16, 2002
23. Garau, M., Slater, M., Vinayagamoorthy, V., Brogni, A., Steed, A., & Sasse, M. A. (2003). The impact of avatar realism and eye gaze control on perceived quality of communication in a shared immersive virtual environment. Paper presented at the CHI 2003, Ft. lauderdale, FL.
24. Heilbrun J., and Pitman D. Testing some basic assumption about psychological androgyny. Journal of Genetic Psychology 135 2 (1979) 175
25. Hert P. Social dynamics of an on-line scholarly debate. The Information Society 13 (1997) 329-360
26. Herring, S. (1994). Gender differences in computer-mediated communication: Bringing familiar baggage to the new frontier. Paper presented at the American Library Association, Miami, Florida.
27. Herring S.C. Gender differences in CMC: Findings and implications. Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility Journal 18 1 (2000). Retrieved October 25, 2005 from
28. Ichheiser G. Appearances and realities: Misunderstanding in human relations (1970), Jossey-Bass, Inc. Publishers, San Francisco
29. Ikea (2006). Company's website. Retrieved 30.09.06.
30. In: Jones S. (Ed). Virtual culture: Identity and communication in cybersociety (1997), Sage Publications, London
31. Karniol R., Reichman S., and Fund L. Children's gender orientation and perceptions of female, male, and gender-ambiguous animal characters. Sex Roles 43 5-6 (2000) 377-393
32. Kenny D.A., Horner C., Kashy D.A., and Chu L. Consensus at zero acquaintance: Replication, behavioral cues, and stability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 62 (1992) 88-97
33. Koda, T., & Maes, P. (1996). Agents with faces: The effects of personification. Paper presented at the Human-Computer Interaction'96, London.
34. Kunda Z. Social cognition: Making sense of people (1999), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
35. Lea M., and Spears R. Paralanguage and social perception in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Organizational Computing 2 3&4 (1992) 321-341
36. Lee E. Effects of gendered character representation on person perception and informational social influence in computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behavior 20 6 (2004) 779-799
37. Lundy A., and Rosenberg J.A. Androgyny, masculinity, and self-esteem. Social Behavior and Personality 15 1 (1987) 91-95
38. Madson L. Inferences regarding the personality traits and sexual orientation of physically androgynous people. Psychology of Women Quarterly 24 (2000) 148-160
39. Maseon, P. (2006). Do avatars dream of electric racoons? BBC News. Retrieved 30.09.06.
40. McCroskey J. Ethos, credibility, and communication in the real world. North Carolina Journal of Speech 4 (1971) 24-31
41. McCroskey J., and Young T. Ethos and credibility: The construct and its measurement after three decades. The Central State Speech Journal 32 (1981) 24-34
42. Murphy P. Social interest and psychological androgyny: Conceptualized and tested. Individual Psychology: Journal of Adlerian Theory, Research & Practice 50 1 (1994) 18-30 Retrieved Monday, April 16, 2007 from the PsycINFO database
43. Nass, C., Steuer, J., Tauber, E., & Reeder, H. (1993). Anthropomorphism, agency, and ethopoea: Computers as social actors. Paper presented at the InterChi'93, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, April 24-29.
44. Nowak K. Sex categorization in CMC: Exploring the Utopian promise. Media Psychology 5 1 (2003) 83-104
45. Nowak K.L. The influence of anthropomorphism and agency on social judgment in virtual environments. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 9 2 (2004). http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol9/issue2/nowak.html
46. Nowak K.L., and Biocca F. The effect of the agency and anthropomorphism on users' sense of telepresence, copresence, and social presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 12 5 (2003) 481-494
47. Nowak K.L., and Rauh C. The influence of the avatar on online perceptions of anthropomorphism, androgyny, credibility, homophily, and attraction. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11 1 (2005) Article 8
48. Oravec J. Virtual individuals, virtual groups: Human dimensions of groupware and computer networking (1996), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
49. Ramirez A., Walther J.B., Burgoon J.K., and Sunnafrank M. Information-seeking strategies, uncertainty, and computer mediated communication toward a conceptual model. Human Communication Research 28 2 (2002) 213-228
50. Schroeder R. Social interaction in virtual environments: Key issues, common themes, and a framework for research. In: Schroeder R. (Ed). The social life of avatars: Presence and interaction in shared virtual environments (2002), Springer-Verlag, London
51. Shapiro K.J. A phenomenological approach to the study of nonhuman animals. In: Mitchell R.W., et al. (Ed). Anthropomorphism, anecdotes, and animals (1997), SUNY, New York 92-101
52. Sherman R., End C., Kraan E., Cole A., Campbell J., Klausner J., et al. Metaperception in cyberspace. Cyber Psychology & Behavior 4 1 (2001) 123-129
53. Shiu, E., & Lenhart, A. (2004). Reports: online activities & pursuits: How Americans use instant messaging. Report from Pew Internet and American Life Project. .
54. Shneiderman, B. (1988). A nonanthropomorphic style guide: Overcoming the humpty-dumpty syndrome. The Computing Teacher, October 9-10.
55. Slater M., and Steed A. Meeting people virtually: Experiments in shared virtual environments. In: Schroeder R. (Ed). The social life of avatars: Presence and interaction in shared virtual environments (2002), Springer-Verlag, London 146-171
56. Soukup C. Multimedia performance in a computer-mediated community: Communication as a virtual drama. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 9 4 (2004). http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol9/issue4/soukup.html
57. Spender D. Nattering on the Net: Women, power and cyberspace (1996), Spinifex Press, Melbourne, Australia
58. Sproull L., and Kiesler S. Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science 32 11 (1986) 1492-1512
59. Suler, J. (1996). Life at the palace: A cyberpsychology case study. [October 5, 2001].
60. Taylor T.L. Life in virtual worlds: Plural existence, multimodalities, and other online research challenges. American Behavioral Scientist 43 3 (1999) 436-449
61. Taylor T.L. Living digitally: Embodiment in virtual worlds. In: Schroeder R. (Ed). The social life of avatars: Presence and interaction in shared virtual environments (2002), Springer-Verlag, London 40-62
62. Walther J.B. Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication: Hyperpersonal dimensions of technology, language, and cognition. Computers in Human Behavior 23 (2007) 2538-2557
63. Wexelblat, A. (1997). Don't make that face: A report on anthropomorphizing an interface [Web Page]. [November 1999].
64. Witmer, D., & Katzman, S. (1997, May 24, 2001). On-line smiles: Does gender make a difference in the use of graphic accents? Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 2(4) Retrieved 18.10.02.
65. Yates S. Gender, identity and CMC. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 13 (1997) 281-290