New advances in the scientific study of text comprehension;Nuevos avances en el estudio científico de la comprensión de textos

Universitas Psychologica

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 331-343

  Marmolejo Ramos, Fernando ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BALLARAT   (Australia)

Author keywords

Inference; Neurocognitive models; Neuroscience; Situation models; Text comprehension

Indexed keywords

EID: 42149188378     PISSN: 16579267     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (65)

1. Altmann, G. T. M. (2001). The Language Machine: Psycholinguistics in Review. British Journal of Psychology, 92, 129-170.
2. Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual Symbol Systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577-660.
3. Belinchón, M., Rivière, A. & J. M. Igoa (1992). Psicología del lenguaje. Investigación teoría. Madrid: Editorial Trotta.
4. Berthoud-Papandropoulou, I. & KilcNer, H. (106). Relations, between the Clinical Method and the Zone of Proximal Development in a Constructivist Approach to Language Acquisition. En A. Tryphon & J. Vonèche (Ed s.), Piaget- Vygotsky: The Social Genesis of Thought (pp. 171-187). Hove, East Sussex: Psychology Press.
5. Black, A., Freeman, P. & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1986). Plausibility and the Comprehension of Text. British Journal of Psychology, 77, 51-62.
6. Bortolussi, M. & Dixon, P. (2003). Psychonarratology: Foundations for the Empirical Study of Literacy Response. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Bower, G. H. & Morrow, D. G. (1990). Mental Models in Narrative Comprehension. Science, 247, 44-48.
8. Bronckart, J.-P. (1981). Procesos y estructuras del desarrollo del lenguaje. Infancia & Aprendizaje, 1, 85-103. (Trabajo original publicado en 1979).
9. Brontkart, J.-P. (2002). La explicación en psicologia ante el desafío del significado. Estudios de Psicología, 23, 387-416.
10. De Vega, M. (1984). lntroduction a la psicología cognitiva. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
11. De Vega, M., Díaz, J. M. & León, I. (1999). Procesamiento del discurso. En M. de Vega & F. Cuetos (Coords.), Psicolingüística del español i) (pp. 271-305. Madrid: Editorial Trotta.
12. De Vega, M., León, I., & Díaz, J. M. (1996) The Representation of Changing Emotions in Reading Comprehension. Cognition and Emotion, 10 (3), 303-321.
13. De Vega, M., Robertson, D. A., Glenberg, A.M., Kaschak, M. R & Rinck, M. (2004). On Doing Two Things at Once: Temporal Constraints on Actions in Language Comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 32 (7), 1033-1043.
14. Dennis, S. (2005). A Memory-based Theory of Verbal Cognition. Cognition Science, 29, 145-193.
15. Dijkstra, K., Zwaan, R. A., Graesser, A. C. & Magliano, J. P. (1994). Character and Reader Emotions in Literary Texts. Poetics, 23, 139-157.
16. Dixon, P. & Bartolussi, M, (2001). Prolegomena for a Science of Psychonarratology. En W. van Peer & S. Chatman (Eds.), New Perspectives on Narrative Perspective (pp. 275-287). Albany, N. Y.: S. U. N. Y. Press.
17. Elosúa, M. R. (2000). Procesos de la comprensión, memoria y aprendizaje de textos. Madrid: Editorial Sanz y Torres, S. L.
18. Elosúa, M. R., García-Madruga, J. A., Gutiérrez, F., Luque, J. L. & Gárate, M. (2002). Effects of an Intervention in Active Strategies for Text Comprehension and Recall. The Spanish Journal of Psychology 5 (2), 90-101.
19. Ferstl, E. C., Rinck, M., & von Cramon, Y. (2005). Emotional and Temporal Aspects of Situation Model Processing during Text Comprehension: An Event-related fMRI Study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17 (5), 724-739.
20. Gárate Larrea, M. (1994). Comprensión de cuentos en los niños: un enfoque cognitivo y sociocultural. Madrid: Siglo XXI de España Editores.
21. García-Madruga, J. A., Elosúa, M. R., Gutiérrez, F., Luque, J. L. & Gárate, M. (1999). Comprensión lectora y memoria operativa: aspectos evolutivos e instruccionales. Barcelona: Paidós.
22. Garnham, A. (1994). Future Directions. En M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 1123-1144). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
23. Garnham, A. (1996). The Other Side of Mental Models: Theories of Language Comprehension. En J. V. Oakhill & A. Garnharn (Fds.), Mental Models in Cognitive Science: Essays in Honor of Phil Johnson-Laird (pp. 35-52). Hove, East Sussex: Psychology Press.
24. Garrod, S., & Pickering, M. J. (2004). Why Conversation is so Easy? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8 (1), 8-11.
25. Gernsbacher, M. A., Goldsmith, H. H., & Robertson, R. R. W. (1992). Do Readers Mentally Represent Characters' Emotional States? Cognition and Emotion, 6 (2), 89-111.
26. Gernsbacher, M. A., & Kaschak, M. P. (2003). Neuroimaging Studies of Language Production and Comprehension. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 91-114.
27. Glenberg, A. M. (1997). What Memory is for? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 1-55.
28. Glenberg, A. M., Havas, D., Becker, R., & Rinck, M. (2005). Grounding Language in Bodily States: The Case for Emotion. En R. Zwaan & D. Pecher (Eds.), The Grounding of Cognition: The Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Languqge, and Thinking (pp. 115-128). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Graesser, A. C., Gernsbacher, M. A. & Goldman, S. (2000). Cognición. En T. A. van Dijk (Comp.), El discurso como estructura y proceso: estudios del discurso. Introducción multidisciplinaria (Vol. 1, pp. 417-452). Barcelona: Editorial Gedisa. (Trabajo original publicado en 1997).
30. Graesser, A. C., Olde, B. A. & Klettke, B. (2002). How Does the Mind Construct arid Represent Stories?. En M. Green, J, Strange & T. Brock (Eds.), Narrative Impact Social and Cognitive Foundations. (pp. 231-263). Mahwah, N. J.: Erlbaum.
31. Graesser, A. C., & Wiemer-Hastings, K. (1999). Situation Models and Concepts in Story Comprehension. En S. R. Goldman, A. C. Graesser & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Narrative Comprehension, Causality, and Cohérence: Essays in Honor of Tom Trabasso (pp. 77-92). Mahwah, N. J.: Erlbaum.
32. Groen, S., Syssau, F., De la Haye, F. & Brouillet, D. (2000, Julio). Emotional Inferences, Course of Activation in the Landscape Model. Documento presentado en el Tenth Annual Meeting of the Society for Text and Discourse, Lyon, Francia.
33. Guajardo, N. R. & Watson, A. C. (2002). Narrative Discourse and Theory of Mind Development. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 163 (3), 305-325.
34. Gutiérrez, F., García-Madruga, J. A., Elosúa, M. R., Luque, J. L. & Gárate, M. (2002). Memoria operativa y comprensión lectora: algunas cuestiones básicas. Acción Psicológica, 1, 45-68.
35. Gutiérrez-Calvo, M. (1999). Inferencias en la comprensión del lenguaje. En M. de Vega & F. Cuetos (Coords.), Psicolingüística del español (pp. 231-270). Madrid: Editorial Trotta.
36. Gygax, P., Garnham, A., & Oakhill, J. (2004). Inferring Characters' Emotional States: Can Readers Infer Specific Emotions? Languqge and Cognitive Processes, 19 (5), 613-639.
37. Hesslow, G. (2002). Conscious Thought as Simulation of Behaviour and Perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6 (6), 242-247.
38. Hoeken, H. & van Vliet, M. (2000). Suspense, Curiosity, and Surprise: How Discourse Structure Influences the Affective and Cognitive Processing of a Story. Poetics, 26, 277-286.
39. Holliday, R., Hamilton, S., Luthra, A., Oddy, M., & Weekes, B. S. (2005). Text Comprehension after Traumatic Brain Injury: Missing the Gist? Brain and Language, 95, 74-75.
40. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1980). Mental Models in Cognitive Science. Cognitive Science, 4, 71-115.
41. Johnson-Laird, P. N. & Byrne, R. (2000). Mental Model Website: A Gentle Introduction. Recuperado el 22 de julio de 2003, de http://www.tcd.ie/Psychology/Ruth_Byrne/mental_models/index.html
42. Karmiloff-Smith, A. D. (1994a). Más allá de la modularidad: la ciencia cognitiva desde la perspectiva del desarrollo. Madrid: Alianza Editorial. (Trabajo original publicado en 1992).
43. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1994b). Précis of Beyond Modularity: A Developmental Perspective on Cognitive Science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17 (4), 693-745.
44. Kaschak, M. P., & Glenberg, A. M. (2000). Constructing Meaning: The Role of Affordances and Grammatical Constructions in Sentence Comprehension. Journal of Memory and Lanuage, 43, 508-529.
45. Kaup, B., Lüdtke, J., & Zwaan, R. (2006). Processing Negated Sentences with Contradictory Predicates: Is a Door that is not Open Mentally Closed? Journal of Pragmatics, 38, 1033-1050.
46. Kintsch, W. (1988). The Role of Knowledge in Discourse Comprehension: A Construction-Integration Model. Psychological Review, 95 (2), 163-182.
47. Kintsch, W., & Rawson, K. A. (2005). Comprehension. En J. Snowling & C. Hume (Eds.), The Science of Reading: A handbook (pp. 209-226). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
48. Kneepkens, E. W. E. M. & Zwaan, R. A. (1994). Emotions and Literary Text Comprehension. Poetics, 23, 125-138.
49. Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A Solution to Plato's Problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis Theory of Acquisition, Induction, and Representation of Knowledge. Psychological Review, 104 (2), 211-240.
50. Landauer, T. K., Foltz, P. W., & Laham, D. (1998). An Introduction to Latent Semantic Analysis. Discourse Processes, 25 (2-3), 259-284.
51. Mar, R. A. (2004). The Neuropsychology of Narrative: Story Comprehension, Story Production and Their Interrelation. Neuropsychologia, 42, 1414-1434.
52. Marmolejo-Ramos, F. & Jiménez, A. T. (2005, diciembre). How Preschoolers Comprehend the Emotional Dimension in Narrative Texts. Resumen presentado en el XV Australian Language and Speech Conference, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
53. Nelson, K. (1999a). Event Representations, Narrative Development and Internal Working Models. Attachment & Human Development, 1 (3), 239-252.
54. Nelson, K. (1999b). Levels and Modes of Representation: Issues for the Theory of Conceptual Change and Development. En E. Scholnick, S. Gelman, P. Miller & K. Nelson (Eds.), Conceptual Development: A Piagetian Llegacy (pp. 269-291). Mahwah, N. J.: L. E. A.
55. Nelson, K. (2000). The Developmental Psychology of Language and Thought. En M. Bennett (Ed.), Developmental Psychology: Achievements and Prospects (pp. 185-204). Hove, East Sussex: Psychology Press.
56. Piñango, M. M. (2006). Understanding the Architecture of Language: The Possible Role of Neurology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10 (2), 49-51.
57. Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H., & Knoblich, G. (2006). Joint Action: Bodies and Minds Moving Together. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10 (2), 70-76.
58. Simon, H. (1984). La teoría del procesamiento de la información sobre la solución de problemas. En M. Carretero & J. A. García-Madruga (Eds.), Lecturas en psicología del pensamiento: razonamiento, solución de problemas y desarrollo cognitivo (pp. 197-219). Madrid: Alianza Editorial, S. A. (Trabajo original publicado en 1978).
59. Steyvers, M., Griffiths, T. L., & Dennis, S. (2006). Probabilistic Inference in Human Semantic Memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10 (7), 327-334.
60. Thorndyke, P. W. (1977). Cognitive Structures in Comprehension and Memory of Narrative Discourse. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 77-110.
61. Tomasello, M. (1999). The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
62. Troiani, V., Ash, S., Reilly, J., & Grossman, M. (2006). The Neural Correlates of Narrative Discourse: An Investigation Using Arterial Spin-labeling. Brain and Language, 99, 204-205.
63. Westermann, G., Sirios, S., Shultz, T. R., & Mareschal, D. (2006). Modeling Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10 (5), 227-232.
64. Zwaan, R. A. (1999). Situation Models: The Mental Leap into Imagined Worlds. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 15-18.
65. Zwaan, R. & Radvansky, G. (1998). Situation Models in Language Comprehension and Memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123 (2), 162-185.