Environmental health research on hazards in the home and the duty to warn

Bioethics

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 209-217

  Resnik, David B ^a   Zeldin, Darryl C ^b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Duty to warn; Environmental health; Ethics; Hazards in the home

Indexed keywords

CHILD; CONFERENCE PAPER; COUNSELING; DANGEROUS GOODS; ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH; ETHICS; HOUSING; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; LEAD POISONING; LEGAL ASPECT; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; RESEARCH ETHICS;

CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COUNSELING; DUTY TO WARN; ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH; ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH; ETHICS, RESEARCH; HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES; HOUSING; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; LEAD POISONING;

EID: 42149183037     PISSN: 02699702     EISSN: 14678519     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00638.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Grimes v. Kennedy Krieger Institute, Inc. 782 A.2d 807 (Md 2001).
2. Ibid.
3. Institute of Medicine (IOM). 2005. Ethical Considerations for Research on Housing-Related Health Hazards Involving Children. Washington, DC:National Academy Press.
4. D. Resnik, R. Sharp D. Zeldin. Research on environmental health interventions: ethical problems and solutions. Account Res 2005 12:69 101.
5. W. Morgan et al. Results of a home-based environmental intervention among urban children with asthma. N Engl J Med 2004 351:1068 1080.
6. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioural Research. 1979. The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. Available at: http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.htm. [accessed 20 December 2007].
7. National Commission, op. cit., note 7.
8. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). 45 C.F.R. 46. Protection of Human Subjects. Available at: http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/45cfr46. html#46.111. [20 December 2007].
9. Ibid, at 45 C.F.R. 46.109.
10. Ibid, at 45 C.F.R. 46.111.
11. Ibid, at 45 C.F.R. 46.116-117.
12. Ibid, at 45 C.F.R. 46.101-102.
13. D. Resnik R. Sharp Protecting third parties in human subjects research. IRB 2006 28, 4:1 7.
14. IOM, op. cit., note 3.
15. Ibid.
16. D. Shalowitz F. Miller. Disclosing individual results of clinical research: Implications of respect for participants. JAMA 2005 294:737 740.
17. Medline Plus. Lead levels - blood. Available at: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/ medlineplus/ency/article/003360.htm#Normal%20Values [Accessed: December 12, 2007].
18. IOM, op. cit., note 3.
19. J. Illes et al. Ethical and practical considerations in managing incidental findings in functional magnetic resonance imaging. Brain Cogn 2002 50:358 365.
20. nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
21. D. Wueste. 1994. Roles, moralities and the problem of conflicting obligations. In: Professional Ethics and Social Responsibility. D. Wueste, ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield: 103-121.
22. E. Emanuel, D. Wendler C. Grady. What makes clinical research ethical? JAMA 2001 283:2701 2711.
23. E. Morreim. The clinical investigator as fiduciary: discarding a misguided idea. J Law Med Ethics 2005 33:586 598.
24. IOM, op. cit., note 3.
25. S. Smith. Mandatory reporting of child abuse/neglect. Available at: http://www.smith-lawfirm.com/mandatory_reporting.htm [accessed 20 December 2007].
26. L. Iavicoli. Mandatory reporting of domestic violence: The law, friend or foe? Mt Sinai Med J 2005 72:228 231.
27. Morreim, op. cit., note 23.
28. IOM, op. cit., note 3.