Routine magnetic resonance cholangiography compared to intra-operative cholangiography in patients with suspected common bile duct stones

Journal of Medical Sciences

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 98-101

  Eshghi, Fariborz ^a  

^a MAZANDARAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

Cholangiogram; Cholelithiasis; MRC

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMMON BILE DUCT STONE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; GALLSTONE; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INVASIVE PROCEDURE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE CHOLANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OPERATION DURATION; PEROPERATIVE CHOLANGIOGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 42149175454     PISSN: 16824474     EISSN: 18125727     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3923/jms.2008.98.101     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Amott, D.A. Webb and B. Tullo, 2005. Prospective comparison of routine and selective operative cholangiography. ANZ J. Surg., 75: 378-382.
2. Barkum, J.S. and A. Barkum, 2004. COMMON PRESENTING PROBLEM,16 Jaundice. ACS, pp: 256.
3. Basili, L. et al., 2000. Magnetic resonance cholangiography comparative study with direct cholangiography. Acta Gastroentrol. Latinoam, 30: 487-490.
4. Dalton, S.J., S. Balupuri and J. Gust, 2005. Routine magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and intra-operative cholangiogram in the evaluation of common bile duct stones. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl., 87: 469-470.
5. Jenderson, M.B., J.E. Thorbol and S. Adamsen et al., 2002. Preoperative routine magnetic resonance cholangiography before laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective study. Eur. J. Surg., 168: 690-694.
6. Katz, D., M. Nikfarjam, A. Sfakiotaki and C. Christophi, 2004. Selective endoscopic cholangiography for the detection of common bile duct stones in patients with cholelithiasis. Endoscopy, 36 (12): 1045-1049.
7. Miletic, D., M. Uravic and M. Mazur-Brabac et al., 2006. Role of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the diagnosis of bile duct lithiasis. World J. Surg., 30: 1705-1712.
8. Nathanson, L.K. and I.J. Martin, 2005. Postoperative ERCP versus laparoscopic choledochostomy for clearance of selected bile duct calculi. Ann. Surg., 242 (2): 188-192.
9. Paul, A., B. Milat and U. Holthausen et al., 2002. Diagnosis and treatment of common bile duct stones: Results of Consensus Development Conference. Surg. Endoscopy, 12: 856-864.
10. Plazzo, I., P.P.M. Girollet and Salmeron et al., 1995. Value of endoscopic ultrasonograpby in the diagnosis of common bile duct stones: Comparison with surgical exploration and ERCP. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 42: 225-2231.
11. Prat, F., G. Amoyal and P. Amoyal et al., 1996. Prospective controlled study of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in patients with suspected common bile duct lithiasis. Lancet, 347: 75-79.
12. Zidi, S.H., F. Prat and O.L. Guen, 1999. Use of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: Prospective comparison with a reference imaging method. Gut, 44: 118-122.