Preoperative routine magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography before laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective study

European Journal of Surgery

Volumn 168, Issue 12, 2002, Pages 690-694

  Jendresen, M B ^a,c   Thorboll J E ^a   Adamsen, S ^b   Nielsen, H ^a   Gronvall S ^a   Hart Hansen, O ^a  

^a HILLERØD HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^b GENTOFTE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^c Mental Health Center Glostrup   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Common bile duct stones; Diagnosis; Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography; Silent bile duct stones

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CLINICAL FEATURE; COMMON BILE DUCT STONE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENMARK; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ECHOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GALLSTONE; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; LIVER FUNCTION TEST; MAGNETIC RESONANCE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE; CHOLECYSTECTOMY, LAPAROSCOPIC; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; DENMARK; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GALLSTONES; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER;

EID: 0038632114     PISSN: 11024151     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/11024150201680024     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Abboud PC, Malet PF, Berlin JA et al. Predictors of common bile duct stones prior to cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 1996; 44:450-459.
2. Andreasen DA, Larsen JF. ERCP and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ugeskr Læger 1998; 160: 4626-4629.
3. Braghetto I, Debandi A, Korn O, Bastias J. Longterm follow-up after laparoscopic cholecystectomy without routine intraoperative cholangiography. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1998; 8: 349-352.
4. Canto I, Chak A, Stellato T, Sivak M. Endoscopic ultrasonography versus cholangiography for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 47: 439-448.
5. Dwerryhouse SJ, Brown E, Vipond MN. Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiography to detect common bile duct stones before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 1998; 85: 1364-1366.
6. Fiore NF, Ledniczky G, Wiebke EA et al. An analysis of perioperative cholangiography in one thousand laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Surgery 1997; 122: 817-823.
7. Giurgiu DI, Margulies DR, Carroll BJ et al. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: long-term outcome. Arch Surg 1999; 134: 839-843.
8. de Lédinghen V, Lecesne R, Raymond J et al. Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: EUS or magnetic resonance cholangiography? A prospective controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 49: 26-31.
9. Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G et al. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 48: 1-10.
10. Materne R, Van Beers BE, Gigot JF et al. Extrahepatic biliary obstruction: magnetic resonance imaging compared with endoscopic ultrasonography. Endoscopy 2000; 32: 3-9.
11. Memon MA, Hassaballa H, Memon MI. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: the past, the present and the future. Am J Surg 2000; 179: 309-315.
12. Norton SA, Alderson D. Prospective comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the detection of bile duct stones. Br J Surg 1997; 84:1366-1369.
13. Onken JE, Brazer SR, Eisen GM et al. Predicting the presence of choledocholithiasis in patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis. Am J Gastroenterol 1996; 91: 762-767.
14. Paul A, Millat B, Holthausen U, Sauerland S, Neugebauer E. Diagnosis and treatment of common bile duct stones (CBDS). Results of a consensus development conference. Surg Endosc 1998; 12: 856-864.
15. Prat F, Amouyal P, Pelletier G et al. Prospective controlled study of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in patients with suspected common bile duct lithiasis. Lancet 1996; 347: 75-79.
16. Rhodes M, Sussman L, Lewis MP. Randomised trial of laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for common bile duct stones. Lancet 1998; 351: 159-161.
17. Rösch T, Dittler HJ, Fockens P, Yasuda K, Lightdale C. Major complications of endoscopic ultrasonography: results of a survey of 42 105 cases. Gastrointest Endosc 1993; 39: 370.
18. Stiris MG, Tennøe B, Aadland E, Lunde OC. MR Cholangiopancreaticography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography in patients with suspected common bile duct stones. Acta Radiol 2000; 41: 269-272.
19. Sugiyama M, Atomi Y. Endoscopic ultrasonography for diagnosing choledocholithiasis: a prospective coparative study with ultrasonography and computed tomography. Gastrointest Endosc 1997; 45: 143-146.
20. Trondsen E, Edwin B, Reitersen O, Færden AE, Fagertun H, Rosseland AR. Prediction of common bile duct stones prior to cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 1998; 133: 162-166.
21. Varghese JC, Liddell RP, Farrell MA, Murray FE, Osborne DH, Lee MJ. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiography and ultrasound compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis. Clin radiol 2000; 55: 25-35.
22. Zidi SH, Prat F, Guen OL et al. Use of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: a prospective comparison with a reference imaging method. Gut 1999; 44: 118-122.