Framing the Internet: A comparison of gendered spaces

Social Science Computer Review

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 152-169

  Royal, Cindy ^a  

^a TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Gender; Internet; Technology; Web; Women; World Wide Web

Indexed keywords

EID: 42149171155     PISSN: 08944393     EISSN: 15528286     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0894439307307366     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Altheide, D.L. (1996). Qualitative media analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. Ang, I. (1985). Watching Dallas. London. Methuen.
3. Bartekian, V. (2004). Dealing with computer and Internet addiction. Retrieved January 14, 2004, from http://www.askmen.com/fashion/body_andmind/ 16better_living.html
4. comScore Networks. (2004, November 14). comScore media metrix announces top 50. Retrieved November 14, 2004, from http://www.comscore.com/press/release. asp?id=517
5. Consalvo, M. (2002). Selling the Internet to women. In M. Consalvo & S. Paasonen (Eds.), Women and everyday uses of the Internet (p. 13). New York: Peter Lang.
6. Cooper, J., & Weaver, K.D. (2003). Gender and computers: Understanding the digital divide. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Dealing with an Internet affair. (2004). Retrieved January 15, 2004, from http://www.ivillage.com
8. Department of Commerce. (2002, February). A nation online: How Americans are expanding their use of the Internet. Retrieved January 14, 2004, from http://www.digitaldivide.gov
9. Entman, R. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43 (4). 53.
10. Feldman, B. (2004). What does "404 error" mean? Retrieved January 15, 2004, from http://www.ivillage.com
11. Ferguson, M. (1983). Women's magazines and the cult of femininity. London. Heinemann.
12. Fraser, N. (1992). Rethinking the public sphere. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the public sphere (pp. 110-111). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Furger, R. (1998). Does Jane compute? New York: Warner.
14. Gledhill, C. (1988). Pleasurable negotiations. In E. D. Pribram (Ed.), Female spectators (pp. 64-89). London: Verso.
15. Griffin, E. (1991). A first look at communication theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
16. How to meet an online love face to face. (2004). Retrieved January 15, 2004, from http://www.ivillage.com
17. Kucharsky, D. (June 2002). AskMen-Online help for clueless men. Digital Marketing, p. 20.
18. Lister, M., Dovey, J., Giddings, S., Grant, I., & Kelly, K. (2003). New media: Determining or determined? In New media: A critical introduction (p. 72). London: Routledge.
19. MacDonald, M. (1998). Representing women: Myths of femininity in the popular media. London: Edward Arnold.
20. Mackenzie, D., & Wajcman, J. (2002). Introductory essay and general issues. In D. Mackenzie & J. Wajcman (Eds.), The social shaping of technology (p. 22). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
21. Margolis, J., & Fischer, A. (2002). Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. McCracken, E. (1993). Decoding women's magazines. London: Macmillan.
23. McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Parlapiano, E., & Cobe, P. (2004). Online scrapbooks: Diane Lillie. Retrieved January 15, 2004, from http://www.ivillage.com/work/experts/ mompreneurs/articles/0,589030_566809,00.html
25. Pew Internet and American Life Project. (2005). Internet: The mainstreaming of online life. Retrieved January 25, 2005, from http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/148/reportdisplay.as
26. Phillips, N., & Hardy, C. (2002). Discourse analysis: Investigating processes of social construction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27. Plant, S. (1997). Zeroes and ones: Digital women + the new techno culture. London. Fourth Estate.
28. Pleticha, K. (April 24. 2002). Feminine or feminist. Retrieved January 14, 2004, from http://www.womenspress.com/newspaper/2002/18-3onli.html
29. Radway, J. (1987). Reading the romance: Women, patriarchy, and popular literature. London. Verson.
30. Reese, S., Gandy, O., & Grant, A. (2001). Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31. RIP: Napster. (2004). Retrieved January 15, 2004, from http://www.askmen.com
32. Royal, C. (2004, Summer). Framing the Internet in gendered spaces: An analysis of iVillage and AskMen.com. Media Report to Women, pp. 6-13.
33. Seiter, E. (2003). Television and the Internet. In G. Dines & J. Humez (Eds.), Gender, race, and class in media (p. 693). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34. Seven ways for families to compute together. (2004). Retrieved January 15, 2004, from http://www.ivillage.com
35. Shedletsky, L.J., & Aitken, J.E. (2004). Human communication on the Internet. Boston: Pearson.
36. Spender, D. (1995). Nattering on the Net: Women, power, and cyberspace. Melbourne, Australia: Spinifex Press.
37. Tankard, J. (2001). The empirical approach to the study of media framing. In S. Reese, O. Gandy, & A. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 96-97). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
38. Tuchman, G. (1978). Introduction: The symbolic annihilation of women by the mass media. Hearth and home: Images of women in the mass media. New York: Oxford University Press.
39. van Zoonen, L. (1992). Feminist theory and information technology. Media, Culture, and Society, 14 (9). 9.
40. van Zoonen, L. (1994). Feminist media studies. London: Sage.
41. Video games: Finding a balance. (2004). Retrieved January 15, 2004, from http://www.ivillage.com
42. Weedon, C. (1996). Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.