Influences on the sense of Neighborhood: Case of Slovenia

Urban Affairs Review

Volumn 43, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 718-732

  Filipović, Maśa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

Influences; Sense of neighborhood; Slovenia

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION; GENDER DISPARITY; INCOME; NEIGHBORHOOD; POST-COMMUNISM;

EURASIA; EUROPE; SLOVENIA; SOUTHERN EUROPE;

EID: 42149167882     PISSN: 10780874     EISSN: 15528332     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1078087407309586     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bramley, G., Morgan, J. 2003. Building competitiveness and cohesion: The role of new house-building in Central Scotland's cities. Housing Studies 18 (4): 447-71.
2. Brown, G., B. Brown, and D. Perkins. 2004. New housing as neighborhood revitalization: Place attachment and confidence among residents. Environment and Behaviour 36 (6): 749-75.
3. Campbell, K.E., and B.A. Lee. 1992. Sources of personal neighbor networks: Social integration, need or time? Social Forces 70(4).
4. European Commission. 2004. The social situation in the European Union. Luxembourg: Office for Official publications of the European Communities.
5. European Commission. 2006. DG Employment, social affairs and equal opportunities. Unit D/2: European employment strategy, CSR, Local development. Indicators for monitoring the employment guidelines including indicators for additional employment analysis. 2006 compendium.
6. Guest, A.M. 2000. The mediate community: The nature of local and extralocal ties within the metropolis. Urban Affairs Review 35 (5): 603-27.
7. Guest, A.M., and S.K. Wierzbicki. 1999. Social ties at the neighborhood level: Two decades of GSS evidence. Urban Affairs Review 35 (1): 92-111.
8. Housing Act. 1991. Official Gazette RS, 18-1/1991.
9. Henning, C., and M. Lieberg. 1996. Strong or weak ties? Neighborhood networks in a new perspective. Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research 13: 3-26.
10. Kim, J., and R. Kaplan. 2004. Physical and psychological factors in a sense of community: New urbanist Kentlands and nearby Orchard Village. Environment and Behaviour 36 (3): 313-40.
11. Kos, D., S. Manič, and M. Filipovič. 2006. Prostorski vidiki stanovanja. In Stanovanje v Sloveniji 2005, edited by S. Mandič and A. Cirman. 85-109. Ljubljana: Fakulteta za dru bene vede.
12. Lelieveldt, H. 2004. Helping citizens help themselves: Neighborhood improvement programs and the impact of social networks, trust, and norms on neighborhood oriented forms of participation. Urban Affairs Review 39 (5): 531-51.
13. Leyden, K.M. 2003. Social capital and the built environment: The importance of walkable neighborhoods. American Journal of Public Health 93 (9): 1546-51.
14. Lindström M., J. Merlo, and P. Östergren. 2002. Individual and neighborhood determinants of social participation and social capital: A multilevel analysis of Malmö, Sweden. Social Science and Medicine 54: 1779-91.
15. Mandič, S. 1996. The changing quality of life during transition-the housing component. Dru boslovne Razprave 12 (22-23): 28-40.
16. Mandič, S., V. Hlebec, A. Cirman, A.K. Dimitrovska, M. Filipovič, D. Kos, and R. Sendi. 2005. Housing Survey. IDV CDB, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ljubljana.
17. Morrison, N. 2003. Neighborhoods and social cohesion: Experiences from Europe. International Planning Studies 8 (2): 115-38.
18. Moser, G., E. Ratiu, and G. Fleury-Bahi. 2002. Apropriation and interpersonal relationships: From dwelling to city through the neighborhood. Environment and Behaviour 43 (1): 122-36.
19. Pol, E. 2002. The theoretical background of the city-identity-sustainability network. Environment and Behaviour 34 (1): 8-25.
20. Ross, C., J. Mirowsky, and S. Pribesh. 2002. Disadvantage, disorder and urban mistrust. City and Community 1 (1): 59-82.
21. Sampson, R.J., S.W. Raudenbush, and F. Earls. 1997. Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science 277: 918-24.
22. Simmel, G. 2000 [1901]. Izbrani spisi o kulturi. Ljubljana: Studia humanitatis.
23. Surs. 2006 a. Statistical office of Republic of Slovenia. Statistical yearbook of RS 2006. Ljubljana: SURS.
24. Surs. 2006 b. Statistical office of Republic of Slovenia. Population census 2002. Slovenia in numbers 2006. Ljubljana: SURS.
25. Stedman, R.S. 2002. Toward a social psychology of place. Environment and Behaviour 34 (5): 561-81.
26. Subramanian, S.V., K.A. Lochner, and I. Kawachi. 2003. Neighborhood differences in social capital: A compositional artifact or a contextual construct. Health and Place 9: 33-44.
27. Temkin, K., and W. Rohe. 1998. Social capital and neighborhood stability: An empirical investigation. Housing Policy Debate 9 (1): 61-88.
28. Uršič, M. 2005. Integracija urbanega sistema Slovenije: Hierarhično ali nehierarhično omrežje. Doctoral dissertation. Ljubljana: Univerza v Ljubljani, FDV.
29. Valera, S., and J. Guardia. 2002. Urban social identity and sustainability: Barcelona's Olympic village. Environment and Behaviour 34 (1): 54-66.
30. White, K. J. C, and A.M. Guest. 2003. Community lost or transformed? Urbanisation and social ties. City and Community 2 (3): 239-59.
31. Young, A.F., A. Russel, and J.R. Powers. 2004. The sense of belonging to a neighborhood: Can it be measured and is it related to health and well being of older women? Social Science and Medicine 59 (10): 2149-60.
32. Youngentob, K., and M. Hostetler. 2005. Is a new urban development model building greener communities? Environment and Behaviour 37 (6): 731-59.