Is a new urban development model building greener communities?

Environment and Behavior

Volumn 37, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 731-759

  Youngentob, Kara ^a   Hostetler, Mark ^b  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Environmentalism; Neotraditional design; New ecological paradigm; Sustainability; Urban planning

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTALISM; SENSE OF PLACE; SUSTAINABILITY; URBAN DESIGN; URBAN PLANNING;

EID: 27644508025     PISSN: 00139165     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0013916505275311     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Arcury, T. A. (1990). Environmental attitude and environmental knowledge. Human Organization, 49, 300.
2. Audirac, I. (1999). Stated preferences for pedestrian proximity: An assessment of New Urbanist sense of community. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19, 53-66.
3. Beauregard, R. A. (2002). New Urbanism: Ambiguous certainties. Journal of Architectural Planning and Research, 19, 181-194.
4. Benfield, K. F., Raimi, M. D., & Chen, D. D. (1999). Once there were greenfields: How urban sprawl is undermining America's environment, economy, and social fabric. New York: Natural Resource Defense Council.
5. Berke, P. R., MacDonald, J., White, N., Homes, M., Line, D., Oury, K., et al. (2003). Greening development to protect watersheds: Does New Urbanism make a difference? Journal of the American Planning Association, 69, 397-413.
6. Brown, B. B., Burton, J. R., & Sweaney, A. L. (1998). Neighbors, households and front porches: New Urbanist community tool or mere nostalgia? Environment and Behavior, 30, 579-601.
7. Brown, B. B., & Cropper, V. L. (2001). New Urban and standard suburban sub divisions: Evaluating psychological and social goals. Journal of the American Planning Association, 67, 402-419.
8. Byers, B. A. (1996). Understanding and influencing behaviors in conservation and natural resource management: African biodiversity series, No. 4. Washington, DC: Biodiversity Support Program.
9. Calthorpe, P., & Fulton, W. (2001). The regional city: Planning for the end of sprawl. Washington, DC: Island.
10. Cialdini, R. B. (1996). Activating and aligning two kinds of norms in persuasive communications. Journal of Interpretation Research, 1(1), 3-10.
11. Coley, R. L., Kuo, F. E., & Sullivan, W. C. (1997). Where does community grow? The social context created by nature in urban public housing. Environment and Behavior, 29, 618-638.
12. Congress of New Urbanism. (2001). Charter of the new urbanism. Retrieved September 14, 2004, from http://www.cnu.org
13. Crawley, M. J. (2002). Statistical computing: An introduction to data analysis using S-plus. New York: John Wiley.
14. Dillman, D. A. (1978). Mail and telephone survey. New York: John Wiley.
15. Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley.
16. Dunlap, R. E., & Scarce, R. (1991). Poll trends: Environmental problems and protection. Public Opinion Quarterly, 55, 651-672.
17. Dunlap, R. E., & Van Liere, K. D. (1978). The "New Environmental Paradigm": A proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results. Journal of Environmental Education, 9, 10-19.
18. Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 425.
19. Ellis, R. J., & Thompson, F. (1997). Culture and the environment in the Pacific Northwest. American Political Science Review, 91, 885-897.
20. Fried, M. (1984). The structure and significance of community satisfaction. Population and Behavior, 7, 61-86.
21. Furman, A. (1998). A note on environmental concern in a developing country: Results from an Istanbul survey. Environment and Behavior, 30, 520-534.
22. Gottdiener, M. (1993). A Marx for our time: Henri Lefebvre and the production of space. Social Theory, 11, 129-134.
23. Hall, K. B., & Porterfield, G. A. (2001). Community by design: New Urbanism for suburbs and small communities. New York: McGraw-Hill.
24. Hostetler, M. (1999). Scale, birds, and human decisions: A potential for integrative research in urban ecosystems. Landscape and Urban Planning, 45, 15-19.
25. Hostetler, M., & Holling, C. S. (2000). Detecting the scales at which birds respond to structure in urban landscapes. Urban Ecosystems, 4, 25-54.
26. Hostetler, M., & Knowles-Yanez, K. (2003). Land use, scale and bird distributions in the Phoenix metropolitan area. Landscape and Urban Planning, 62, 55-68.
27. Jacobson, S. (1999). Communication skills for conservation professionals. Washington, DC: Island.
28. Katz, P., & Scully, V., Jr. (1994). The New Urbanism: Toward an architecture of community. New York: McGraw-Hill.
29. Kim, J., & Kaplan, R. (2004). Physical and psychological factors in sense of community: New Urbanist Kentlands and nearby Orchard Village. Environment and Behavior, 36, 313-340.
30. Kuo, F. E., Bacaicoa, M., & Sullivan, W. C. (1998). Transforming inner-city landscapes - Trees, sense of safety, and preference. Environment and Behavior, 30, 28-59.
31. Leung, C., & Rice, J. (2002). Comparison of Chinese-Australian and Anglo-Australian environmental attitudes and behaviors. Social Behavior and Personality, 30(3), 251-262.
32. Mazzumdar, S., & Mazzumdar, S. (1997). Intergroup social relations and architecture: Vernacular architecture and issues of status, power, and conflict. Environment and Behavior, 29, 374-422.
33. Musser, G. (2000). Between burb and burg: Tthe father of New Urbanism, Andres Duany, is reshaping suburbia - and the practice of architecture. Scientific American, 282, 28.
34. Myers, R., & Ewel, J. (1990). Ecosystems of Florida. Orlando: University of Central Florida Press.
35. Plas, J. M., & Lewis, S. E. (1996). Environmental factors and sense of community in a planned town. American Journal of Community Psychology, 24, 109-143.
36. Platt, R. H. (2004). Toward ecological cities: Adapting to the 21st century metropolis. Environment, 46, 10-18.
37. Platt, R. H., Rowntree, R. A., & Muick, P. C. (Eds.). (1994). The ecological city. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
38. POPIN. (2000). World population information. United Nations population information network. Retrieved January 20, 2002, from http:// www.undp.org/popin
39. Seguin, C., Pelletier, L. G., & Hunsley, J. (1998). Toward a model of environmental activism. Environment and Behavior, 30, 628-653.
40. Shrivastava, P. (1995). The role of corporations in achieving ecological sustainability. Academy of Management Review, 20, 936-960.
41. Song, Y., & Knapp, G. J. (2003). New Urbanism and housing values: A disaggregate assessment. Journal of Urban Economics, 54, 218-238.
42. Talen, E. (1999). Sense of community and neighborhood form: An assessment of the social doctrine of new urbanism. Urban Studies, 36, 1361-1379.
43. Taylor, A. F., Wiley, A., Kuo, F. E., & Sullivan, W. C. (1998). Growing up in the inner city - Green spaces as places to grow. Environment and Behavior, 30, 3-27.
44. Till, K. E. (2001). New Urbanism and nature: Green marketing and the neo-traditional community. Urban Geography, 22, 220-248.
45. Zimmerman, J. (2001). The "nature" of urbanism on the New Urbanist frontier: Sustainable development, or defense of the suburban dream? Urban Geography, 22, 249-267.