Dynamic traffic equilibrium: Theoretical and experimental network game results in single-bottleneck model

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 2029, 2007, Pages 1-13

  Ramadurai, Gitakrishnan ^a   Ukkusuri, Satish V ^a  

^a RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; GRAPHIC METHODS; ONLINE SYSTEMS;

ARRIVAL TIMES; DYNAMIC USER EQUILIBRIUM (DUE).;

TRAFFIC CONTROL;

EID: 42149158362     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2029-01     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Wardrop, J. Some Theoretical Aspects of Road Traffic Research. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Vol. 1, No. 2, 1952, pp. 325-378.
2. Friesz, T. L., D. Bernstein, T. E. Smith, and B. W. Wie. A Variational Inequality Formulation of the Dynamic Network User Equilibrium Problem. Operations Research, Vol. 41, No. 1, 1993, pp. 179-191.
3. Boyce, D., D.-H. Lee, and B. Ran. Analytical Models of the Dynamic Traffic Assignment Problem. Networks and Spatial Economics, Vol. 1, No. 3-4, 2001, pp. 377-390.
4. Nash, J. Non-Cooperative Games. The Annals of Mathematics, Vol. 54, No. 2, 1951, pp. 286-295.
5. Altman, E., and L. Wynter. Equilibrium, Games, and Pricing in Transportation and Telecommunication Networks. Networks and Spatial Economics, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2004, pp. 7-21.
6. Vickrey, W. S. Congestion Theory and Transport Investment. American Economic Review, Vol. 59, 1969, pp. 251-261.
7. Hendrickson, C., and G. Kocur. Schedule Delay and Departure Time Decisions in a Deterministic Model. Transportation Science, Vol. 15, No. 1, 1981, pp. 62-77.
8. Smith, M. J. The Existence of a Time-Dependent Equilibrium Distribution of Arrivals at a Single-Bottleneck. Transportation Science, Vol. 18, No. 4, 1984, pp. 385-394.
9. Daganzo, C. The Uniqueness of a Time-Dependent Equilibrium Distribution of Arrivals at a Single-Bottleneck. Transportation Science, Vol. 19, No. 1, 1985, pp. 29-37.
10. Arnott, R., A. de Palma, and R. Lindsey. A Structural Model of PeakPeriod Congestion: A Traffic Bottleneck with Elastic Demand. American Economic Review, Vol. 83, No. 1, 1993, pp. 161-179.
11. Bernstein, D. Non-Existence of Nash Equilibria for the Deterministic Departure-Time Choice Problem. Presented at Joint National Meeting ORSA/TIMS, Detroit, Mich., Oct. 1994.
12. Small, K. A. The Scheduling of Consumer Activities: Work Trips. American Economic Review, Vol. 72, 1982, pp. 467-479.
13. Bell, M. G. H., and Y. Iida. Transportation Network Analysis. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1997.
14. Konishi, H. Uniqueness of User Equilibrium in Transportation Networks with Heterogeneous Commuters. Transportation Science, Vol. 38, No. 3, 2004, pp. 315-330.
15. Lindsey, R. Existence, Uniqueness, and Trip Cost Function Properties of User Equilibrium in the Bottleneck Model with Multiple User Classes, Transportation Science, Vol. 38, No. 3, 2004, pp. 293-314.
16. Szeto, W. Y., and H. Lo. Dynamic Traffic Assignment: Properties and Extensions. Transportmetrica, 2, 2006, pp. 31-52.
17. Helbing, D., M. Schönhof, H.-U. Stark, and J. A. Holyst, How Individuals Learn to Take Turns: Emergence of Alternating Cooperation in a Congestion Game and the Prisoner's Dilemma. Advances in Complex Systems, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2005, pp. 87-116.
18. Selten, R., M. Schreckenberg, T. Pitz, T. Chmura, and S. Kube. Experiments and Simulations on Day-to-Day Route Choice-Behaviour. CESifo Working Paper Series No. 900. April 2003. Social Science Research Network. ssrn.com/abstract=393841. Accessed Nov. 14, 2006.
19. Iida, Y., T. Akiyama, and T. Uchida. Experimental Analysis of Dynamic Route Choice Behavior. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 26,No. 1, 1992, pp. 17-32.
20. Mahmassani, H. S., G.-L. Chang, and R. Herman. Individual Decisions and Collective Effects in a Simulated Traffic System. Transportation Science, Vol. 20, No. 4, 1986, pp. 258-271.
21. Srinivasan, K. K., and H. S. Mahmassani. Dynamic Decision and Adjustment Processes in Commuter Behavior Under Real-Time Information. Center for Transportation Research, University of Texas, Austin, Feb. 2001.
22. Daganzo, C. F. The Cell Transmission Model: A Simple Dynamic Representation of Highway Traffic Consistent with the Hydrodynamic Theory. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 28, 1994, pp. 269-287.
23. Daganzo, C. F. The Cell Transmission Model II: Network Representation. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 29, 1005, pp. 79-93.